Angels & Demons poster

Comments: 6
terometer
50%
Strike Back below!
by: Mike Sampson Mar. 24, 2009

Today Sony Pictures debuted the new poster for ANGELS AND DEMONS on their Twitter page just days after Lionsgate became the first studio to debut official content on the microblog site. Sadly though, the poster, which you can see below, is not very good. Pretty much the opposite of this poster. It almost look like, if you zoom in close enough, that they Photoshopped Tom Hanks' face onto a stand-in's body. Not his entire head, but just his face. I dunno, something seems odd. Anyway, check it out below and while you're at it, come visit our official Twitter page.

Source: Twitter

6 discussions Expand all
Show Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Most Popular
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Netforce
12:02AM on 03/25/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
How come Tom Hanks' face is so mysteriously bright??
How come Tom Hanks' face is so mysteriously bright??
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
Dr.Frankenstein
11:44PM on 03/24/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Like the One sheet poster
The film...iffy? The One Sheet poster-Cool.
The film...iffy? The One Sheet poster-Cool.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
alexskelton
8:40PM on 03/24/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
it WILL be better than Da Vinci
I foolishly read A&D first, thinking it would be necessary to understand DVC. Instead, I loved it and then was disappointed by the inferior sequel. i doubt i'm the only one who thinks that

it will translate to film much better. fun fact. the producers of 24 originally wanted to use its plot for season 3, but dan brown didnt want it adapted to another character, and wanted the mov...
I foolishly read A&D first, thinking it would be necessary to understand DVC. Instead, I loved it and then was disappointed by the inferior sequel. i doubt i'm the only one who thinks that

it will translate to film much better. fun fact. the producers of 24 originally wanted to use its plot for season 3, but dan brown didnt want it adapted to another character, and wanted the movies made with Langdon. the producer (brian grazer) agreed, and he got partner Ron Howard to come in.

the twists in A&D are much more cinematic... in da vinci, chapters ended with "ohhh.. so the history of jesus was really *****", whereas the twists in angels are very much based on plot.. without going into spoilers, there is what amounts to a giant bomb hidden somewhere in vatican city, and langdon must find it, and stop an evil society from disrupting the selection of the new pope. i dont think it would have worked with Jack Bauer, but this movie will be good. i hope.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
locREDUX
8:20PM on 03/24/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Never saw the first one, all i remeber is tom hanks hair. haha. where'd it go? i almost went and saw it because of it.
Never saw the first one, all i remeber is tom hanks hair. haha. where'd it go? i almost went and saw it because of it.
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
barfly126
8:13PM on 03/24/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Ishh ..
"The Da Vinci Code" was dull, I mean really dull ! I hope this one will work better !
"The Da Vinci Code" was dull, I mean really dull ! I hope this one will work better !
 
+0
Vote Up Vote Down
kdraines
8:08PM on 03/24/2009 Add as a friend | MFC profile
Love it.
I thought "The Da Vinci Code" worked quite well considering the source material.

"Angels & Demons" is a far superior book. Although, how they are going to do it justice with anything less than an R rating is beyond me.
I thought "The Da Vinci Code" worked quite well considering the source material.

"Angels & Demons" is a far superior book. Although, how they are going to do it justice with anything less than an R rating is beyond me.