What I respect about the Poltergeist series is that each film is
different. Part 1 and 2 were very different but they still had the same
vibe. Part 3 runs away from the feel of the first two installment for
better and for worse. The family unit (The Freelings) so prominent in the
first two is absent and replaced by an aunt/uncle/cousin relationship
instead. It’s not nearly as powerful as the "family" in the
first two and the film suffers because of that. On the other hand the
change of location is a great idea. This building is one creepy place,
filled with mirrors, which is the films most efficient trick. Every
"scare", "creep out scene" done via the mirrors works
like a charm and is sure to give you the willies. All the special effects
were done "live", on set. Nothing was added in post prod (unlike
the previous two films). The new approach to the gooey goods worked for
me, it gives the visuals a stronger presence. Heather O'Rourke also gets
to act more in this film. The fact that she’s older helps a lot. It’s
sad to watch when you take her death into consideration. She’s such a
sweety and I’m sure she would have grown to be a good woman.
On the negative side,
Bruce (Skerrit) and Pat (Allen) are really not impressed by ghosts. I mean
they witness a demon coming out of Carol Ann’s door and they’re all
chill about it afterwards. Nothing impresses these two. The film also gets
downright confusing halfway through, I never knew what side of the mirror
the cast was on and in the end I just gave up and went with it. The film
also offers us some teen hijinx that I could’ve went without. In my book
we keep that sort of stuff for the Friday The 13th series.
Bringing back Tangina
(Rubinstein) was also a bad idea, she feels out of place, has way too many
monologues and just doesn’t work. Also what she does in the end totally
opposes what the first film was about. The "new" Kane (Nathan
Davis) is not nearly as creepy as the original (Julian Beck passed away).
Maybe he just pales in comparison to Beck’s chilling turn in part 2.
The film has two
characters that I truly despised. One is a very unlikable psychologist Dr.
Seaton (Richard Fire) who has dumb as "Jim Carrey" theories on
Carol Ann’s "ghost" history…he thinks she’s able to mass hypnotize
people. I guess she mass hypnotized the house into the ground in Part 1…duh…his
theories suck! I prayed he would die early on and horribly….my prayers
were not answered. The other is Donna’s little crush Scott (Kip Wentz).
For some reason the man got on my nerves big time. Maybe it’s his Ronald
McDonald hairdo, maybe it’s his constant grinning…he just did not
appeal to me.
The ending is also very
anti climatic. But that’s because they never finished the film.
Seventeen minutes of shooting still had to be done when Heather O'Rourke
passed on. So what we get is a "bogus" ending that is far from
satisfying. I love the
Poltergeist series. I love Heather O'Rourke and even with all it’s flaws
I liked this movie. I did miss the "Freelings" immensely but the
concept is very kool, the acting is decent, the directing is top notch and
some scenes really creeped me out. Look inside the looking glass…