Arrow in the Head RSS Feeds Arrow in the Head on Twitter Arrow in the Head on Facebook
    A.I.T.H Store | Poster Store | Join/Register | LogIn | RSS Newsfeeds | Contact Us
Latest Joblo Show

PLAY Episode #32
DVD Pub Reviews
Review: Pandemic
Pandemic

Review: Dark Country
Dark Country

Review: Dead Air
Dead Air
AITH Videos
Kill of the Day #279 - GROSSE POINTE BLANK
PLAY
Kill of the Day #279 - GROSSE POINTE BLANK

THE DESCENT: PART 2 (2010) - TV Spot
PLAY
THE DESCENT: PART 2 (2010) - TV Spot

THE ROAD (2009) -
PLAY
THE ROAD (2009) - "The Man's Dream" Clip
 
1044
# A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Max Payne (2008)

Directed by
: John Moore

Starring:

Mark Wahlberg/Max Payne
Mila Kunis/Mona Sax
beau Bridges/BB
Ludacris/Jim

Rating:
Printer-friendly version
> Buy this DVD > Buy Horror Posters
> Buy Horror Collectibles > Buy Arrow Merchandise
PLOT-CRUNCH:
Somebody killed Max Payne’s (Wahlberg) wife and child; and he’ll find out who it is and pay them back no matter what. Lock, load… blanks?
THE LOWDOWN:
I’ve played both the first two MAX PAYNE games and always had an affinity for them (although the second one was too short). The noir style, the bullet time, the narration…gold! So when I heard they were making a MAX PAYNE film, my jockeys shrunk to a bunch. When I heard Mark Wahlberg was cast as Payne, I screamed “inspired casting” and when I saw the trailer; wow, I was primed for some Payne. So you can imagine how I feel right now, having just seen the thing, and having to write down that it blew lama dongs. Bummer…

On a high note, I did value that the filmmakers incorporated so many plot elements, characters and locations from the game into their cinematic version of it. At least it showed that they gave a shit off the bat. Wahlberg owned the screen on his end via his intense and emotionally charged show, so at least I had somebody to root for throughout this dreck. The handful of bullet time/time stands still moments and heavy handed aesthetics (all about Payne’s face illuminated by muzzle flashes – nice!) had the fanboy in me going "f*ck yeah" as well. We so needed more moments like that to PAYNE the film up. And finally the flick looked noir-ish slick; the somber mood, the constant snow, the plays on lighting, shite even the CG Valkeries came through – awesome!

So what went wrong? I guess my main complaint was that the film was 90% plot and bla-bla and 10 percent action. That wouldn’t be so bad if the plotline was the shit but here it was executed in such a stale and clumsily connect the dots fashion that I was the one feeling the payne. Think watching paint dry. The same went for the mystery at hand, the one I guessed right away…yeah that one! Nough said! Moreover, the film’s jumbled handling of its emotional core grated me. I mean what you have here is the heart of a vigilante flick. Why was it so cold? The flick just didn’t know how to push my buttons to get me all emotionally riled up as I should’ve been.

And why was Mila Kunis in this movie again? Her character was so badly handled, she could’ve easily been snipped out and the plot line would have stayed intact. And that was just ONE example of the film’s ineptness as to characters and relationships. Add to that random plot holes, lousy casting (If Ludacris is a cop, I’m the Queen of England), dumb-dumb exposition (all about that tats dude...lol), a sad-sack knack at missing the boat when it came to running with fanboy pleasing action opportunities (that was a weak sauce mano et mano fight as to the main thug, yawn), lack of graphic violence (the film begged for it) and too short for their own good pow-pow bits and you get my biggest let down of the year.

Let’s take a moment to mourn Max Payne. He was a good man, stuck in a lousy movie.
GORE:
Bullets wounds aside, nothing really. It wore its PG 13 rating proudly on its sleeve! Bugh…
ACTING:
Mark Wahlberg (Max Payne) made for a bang on Payne. Too bad the movie didn’t live up to his presence and performance. Mila Kunis (Mona Sax) showed up to look hot – not much of a role. Beau Bridges (BB) was on and off, not always credible while Ludacris (Jim Bravura) didn’t sell me as a Police Officer. So that’s what happened to Chris O'Donnell (Colvin)! Good performance, small role. Amaury Nolasco (Jack Lupino) looked the role and was under-used. NOTE: Why was Nelly Furtado in this again? EXACTLY!
T & A:
Olga Kurylenko showed off legs and the side of her tangerines and that was pretty much it. See her in Hitman to get the real goods!
DIRECTING:
Moore put out a handful of mucho inspired shots, slick angles and slow motion whoreness that rubbed me the right way. Problem was, since the flick was more talk than action, I didn’t get enough of them moments to feel fulfilled.
SOUNDTRACK:
Marco Beltrami served up another bleak, cool and totally bad ass score. Must get this one!
BOTTOM LINE:
I sensed I was in trouble when the token Max Payne game guitar lick didn't open the picture. MAX PAYNE looked superfly, sported a solid lead and a couple of novel visual moments. Unfortunately, the sluggish and chop-shop narrative, the anti-mystery, the poorly explored characters/relationships, the "safe" violence and worse of all THE LACK OF ACTION kept this one at the bottom of the river wearing concrete boots. RIP Max!
BULL'S EYE:
The film was shot in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

John Moore has done one solid film IMO and that was Behind Enemy Lines.

The film initially was given an R rating, so they snipped it down for a PG 13.

DROWN THE MAX PAYNE WEBSITE HERE


Discuss this movie on the Arrow's Horror Board



© 2004 John Fallon All Rights Reserved JoBlo.com


1.3/4

Register to Post | MyJoBlo.com | Rules / Guidelines
Username:
Password:
 
Not Registered? Sign-up!!

Viewing 1-5 of 5 User Comments
1

dizzle5150 on Nov 10 2008, 7:42:33 PM Writes:
Rating: 0/4
I finally got around to seeing this today. Wow. I wish I could have those 90 or so minues of my life back. This movie just edged out The Happening for the worst flick I've seen this year.
Profile | Buddy

critic_h8er on Oct 31 2008, 7:05:07 AM Writes:
Rating: 4/4
I loved it.

I thought the action was plentiful, and more importantly, was COMPLEMENTARY to the plot, rather than being a mindless shoot-'em-up with no heart.

This was more like a 1940's film noir detective suspense thriller, post-Millennium action style.

As usual I'm in the minority, of course...
Profile | Buddy

Silverload on Oct 19 2008, 4:29:21 AM Writes:
Rating: 1/4
Wow, what a complete mess of a movie. It's a long drawn out mystery without the mystery, it's an action film without the action, and we've got a badass character that doesn't do anything badass (not even as much as a single one-liner). There are so many pointless and boring characters that I easily forgot them once they were off the screen. The script is such an incoherent piece of cliched garbage that I wouldn't be surprised if Uwe Boll wrote it. Max Payne is without a doubt the worst movie of the year.

The only things keeping this from 0/4 are the pretty visuals.
Profile | E-mail | Buddy

Lucky Denver on Oct 18 2008, 12:46:45 AM Writes:
Rating: 1.5/4
This movie looked awesome and that's really about it. Wahlberg was good and the valkeries looked dope as shit. But the script wasn't very well written, it seemed like the movie was edited to hell and the plot was damn near see through. Oh, and people in the theater actually laughed when Ludacris showed up on screen. I don't think that was the intention.
Profile | E-mail | Buddy

Dewey on Oct 16 2008, 1:45:20 PM Writes:
Rating: 0/4
damn... i was so looking forward to this movie.. praying that it was actually be quite good.
ah well.. back to playing the game then i guess until they release a directors cut keeping the R rating!
Profile | E-mail | Buddy


Viewing 1-5 of 5 User Comments
1




















Current / Upcoming | Horror Past | General Horror Talk | Horror Reviews | Foreign Horror Talk
Best / Worst / Etc... | Buy / Sell Horror Movies | Horror Guessing Games | Horror Franchises | Other Horror Links

Hosting provided by the good folks at Nexcess.net
Site Design by Face 3 Media