|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Viewing
1-5 of 5 User Comments
1
|
|
PreySlayDisplay
on Oct 30 2007, 5:33:35 AM writes:
Excellent. As long as they keep focus on what makes Bond who he is, and not so much on his gadgets and all the flashy stuff that made Brosnan's Bond such a bore, I'm all for it. Craig was an excellent Bond and Casino Royale was exactly what this series needed. I can't wait for more. |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
 Derrida
on Oct 30 2007, 5:07:25 AM writes:
NOBODY DOES IT BETTER
Craig IS Bond. Why do people want Clive Owen - he has the looks but unfortunately he also has the most annoying voice in the world.
I say bring on more Craig!!! |
| Profile | E-mail | Buddy |
|
 Snowboy
on Oct 30 2007, 5:00:42 AM writes:
Simon Pegg would've made a good Bond too ;)
But seriously..I'm all for it, so long as they keep in tune with the quality of CASINO ROYALE. |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
 NoriNam30
on Oct 29 2007, 9:46:49 PM writes:
Eh, I still say they shoulda gone with Nick Frost for the new Bond! |
| Profile | E-mail | WWW | Buddy |
|
Doctor Zubian
on Oct 29 2007, 8:43:40 PM writes:
BONDAGE
yeah, thats ok, 4 movies with craig, then re-cast it again with Clive Owen.... |
| Profile | E-mail | Buddy |
|
|
Viewing 1-5 of 5 User Comments
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So good was Daniel Craig at re-inventing James Bond as the gritty, darkly brooding, deeply flawed, testicle torture tolerating super spy that we all knew he should be, MGM 
Previous
