First Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt Photo! Really cute!

[ElderPredator]

Hey everybody,

Below is the exclusive and first sneak peek at this month's issue of Hello Magazine which features little Shiloh with Mom and Dad. Everybody looks very happy and I have to say, Shiloh is a little sweetheart. Mom looks beautiful as always and Brad looks happy as well.

Here is the photo with more to come in the next few days.

http://img327.imageshack.us/img327/9406/shilohnouveljoliepittpictures4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Mr.HyDe807]

Thank god! Now i can sleep at night!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!;)

[thedudeman69]

Now, we can all go back to our daily grind while those guys sit comfortably on their rich asses.

[Backstabba]

That baby doesn't look cute....
Don't all babies look cute?...
Ok, fine, I guess.
What?

[ElderPredator]

Originally posted by Backstabba
That baby doesn't look cute....
Don't all babies look cute?...
Ok, fine, I guess.
What?

:D

You want to see the $17,000 pacifier they bought her. It had 14K gold on it and covered in crystal. That kid is set for life and will never have to worry about anything. If only that was true for all of us. Oh well!

[thedudeman69]

I found another pic of the baby


http://www.ebertfest.com/one/shiloh4b.jpg





...damn, I am mean. :D

[Scarfather]

Wow. A baby. Okay..

WERE THE TABLOIDS EXPECTING AN ANGELIC SPAWN OF GOD!!!!!?????

I DON'T REALLY GIVE A FUCK!

Jesus.

[ElderPredator]

I know it's no big deal, I just wanted to be the first one to post the first photo on here. Sorry if I caused people grief cause the story is annoying me just as much. Apologies all around! :D

[electriclite]

Originally posted by ElderPredator
:D

You want to see the $17,000 pacifier they bought her. It had 14K gold on it and covered in crystal. That kid is set for life and will never have to worry about anything. If only that was true for all of us. Oh well!

Actually that was given to them as a FREE gift from some boutique.


Just what rich people need: FREE SWAG! :mad:

[ElderPredator]

Originally posted by electriclite
Actually that was given to them as a FREE gift from some boutique.


Just what rich people need: FREE SWAG! :mad:

I see, thanks electriclite, didn't know that.

[moviemaniac8210]

Originally posted by ElderPredator
I know it's no big deal, I just wanted to be the first one to post the first photo on here

Someone beat you to it my friend, on another thread.

[ElderPredator]

Originally posted by moviemaniac8210
Someone beat you to it my friend, on another thread.

That was actually me again. I posted the photo and then decided to make a whole new thread. Sorry.

I love your avatar by the way, very freaky moment in Halloween 4!

[moviemaniac8210]

Originally posted by ElderPredator
That was actually me again. I posted the photo and then decided to make a whole new thread. Sorry.

I love your avatar by the way, very freaky moment in Halloween 4!

Well good job on getting that pic. It was very cute indeed. Thanks, I love it also, Michael Myers rules :D

[ElderPredator]

Originally posted by moviemaniac8210
Well good job on getting that pic. It was very cute indeed. Thanks, I love it also, Michael Myers rules :D

He does rule. For some strange reason, his expressionless face just scares the hell out of people. I still think that Halloween 4 is the scariest with it's creepy music, angles and his mask was perfect in that movie.

Anyway, back to Angelina. Not a problem!

[bankholdup]

I really want to post a picture of the Eraserhead baby, but Pitt is just too damn sexy to use it!

[Scarfather]

Of course, everyone knows thats a stand-in baby: this is the real one:

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a12/pop_tart24/eraserhead.jpg

[NuclearMisfit]

Wow look at the giant lips on that baby. That thing is all lips, where is the baby at!?

[jolanar]

Thats one ugly baby! (Most babies are!)

But congrats nonetheless!

[RustyRazor]

http://img327.imageshack.us/img327/9406/shilohnouveljoliepittpictures4.jpg


ANGELINA: "Brad?"
BRAD: "Yes, Angelina?"
ANGELINA: "I can't believe she downed that entire bottle of Schmirnoff so quickly! This kid's a stud!
BRAD: "Hell yeah, she is! When she comes too, we're hittin' the bar!"
SHILOH: (Slurring her speech) "...can you two shut the fuck up?! Trying to...come down! Shiloh...they named Shiloh?! Eh...could've been Benji....or Cujo...."

[gorysnoopy]

Originally posted by thedudeman69
I found another pic of the baby


http://www.ebertfest.com/one/shiloh4b.jpg





...damn, I am mean. :D


I'll take that beagle over the kid any day.

[bigred760]

Let me get this straight - that pic is worth $4.1 million?!?! There are some things I will never understand. :rolleyes:

[RustyRazor]

Originally posted by bigred760
Let me get this straight - that pic is worth $4.1 million?!?! There are some things I will never understand. :rolleyes:


People of the press, for the first photo of the Chivas Regal New Coke Jolie Voight Shamalayan Pitt baby, we demand:











http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Dr_Evil.jpg/250px-Dr_Evil.jpg


4.1 MILLION dollars!



Oh look at the baby.
What's the big freakin' deal?
Not quite that evil just yet.
She's like the Diet Coke of evil.
Just one calorie, not evil enough.

[gorysnoopy]

:D :D :D

[Scarfather]

Oh good, People magazine is bitching about the photo being release now they're threatening LEGAL ACTION (according to imdb).

You payed 4.1 million for a picture of a baby. I think that qualifies the staff and editors as legally retarded.

I'm going to take twenty minutes before I go to work, to post that picture on every blog and message board I can find. IT'S A FUCKIN' BABY! GOD DAMN. NOBODY CARES. MY FRIEND AT WORK BUYS EVERY TABLOID ON THE SHELF AND EVEN SHE DOESN'T CARE.

[Scarfather]

The irony is that Natalie Portman/Scarlett Johansson/Keira Knightley/some Hollywood starlet will get knocked up eventually and we'll go through the whole thing again.

[X-Nightcrawler]

Someone has got to explain me the hate to celebrity babies.

"OMFG I HOPE THAT FUCKING KID CHOKES ON ITS OWN FUCKING PUKE!!!!"

It's sickening.

[Scorpio24]

Originally posted by Scarfather
The irony is that Natalie Portman/Scarlett Johansson/Keira Knightley/some Hollywood starlet will get knocked up eventually and we'll go through the whole thing again.


For the life of me I can't see the irony in that.


But regardles fear not. I can't speak for Natalie but Keira and Scarlett have both told me that they want to retire to a moutain lake cabin and bring up or kids in seclusion.

[Tagia_Romero]

Originally posted by Scorpio24
For the life of me I can't see the irony in that.


But regardles fear not. I can't speak for Natalie but Keira and Scarlett have both told me that they want to retire to a moutain lake cabin and bring up or kids in seclusion.

What has your wife said about that? :p

[Scorpio24]

Originally posted by Tagia_Romero
What has your wife said about that? :p

:D

We are not married only engaged. I know I call her my missus usualy indicating wife but it's just habbit.

Anyway i've informed her that she is welcome to come along and that she will be my favourite but I can't put up with these phone calls hounding me at all hours in the night pleading for my body. #sigh# I feel it's just easier all round if I give in and we all move in togeather.

:D :p

[JCR]

Originally posted by Scarfather
Oh good, People magazine is bitching about the photo being release now they're threatening LEGAL ACTION (according to imdb).

You payed 4.1 million for a picture of a baby. I think that qualifies the staff and editors as legally retarded.

I'm going to take twenty minutes before I go to work, to post that picture on every blog and message board I can find. IT'S A FUCKIN' BABY! GOD DAMN. NOBODY CARES. MY FRIEND AT WORK BUYS EVERY TABLOID ON THE SHELF AND EVEN SHE DOESN'T CARE.

Actually the sad thing is it's probably a really safe bet- I'd be shocked if increased worldwide mag sales did not cover the cost.

[someguy]

Originally posted by X-Nightcrawler
Someone has got to explain me the hate to celebrity babies.

"OMFG I HOPE THAT FUCKING KID CHOKES ON ITS OWN FUCKING PUKE!!!!"

It's sickening.

You don't get it. Nobody said that, and the hatred is brought on towards the press who take the baby of two celebrities and make it seem like a bigger news piece than a major war criminal finally being killed among other world issues.

I don't give a shit about the two of them having their baby. Good for them, I hope they have a nice life together. Honestly though, does it effect us in any way? Unless this baby had tentacles for arms or it would suck your dick for a dollar, there is no possible way that this news is of any importance. It's just a cheap entertainment, we can't get enough of these actors and actresses in the movies so we have to invade their lives to see them more.

4.1 million dollars is RETARDED. I respect Angelina a lot for donating that money to charity, she knows she doesn't need it and it could go to better causes. The gossip business is trash, and this is what we're going after. Not the baby, so please understand that before saying it's sickening.

Which do you find more sickening though. Someone who says that they hope the baby dies just to show how annoyed they are by the coverage, or a multi-million dollar business that is funded on what the star of some TV sitcom did between 2:15 and 2:20pm.

[X-Nightcrawler]

Originally posted by someguy
Which do you find more sickening though. Someone who says that they hope the baby dies just to show how annoyed they are by the coverage, or a multi-million dollar business that is funded on what the star of some TV sitcom did between 2:15 and 2:20pm. Someone that says that they hope the baby dies just to show how annoyed they are.

But that's beyond the point, I actually didn't mean this thread with that comment (doesn't seem too hateful). I don't remember what other celebrity baby (probably Spears') thread had most replies as "OMFG I FUCKING HATE HIM ARGH!" which hey, I find just wrong. I don't care if the baby was born, no (though I'm glad it was born healthy, I don't have a reason to hate any celebrity) and I CERTAINLY don't care if they spend 100,000 dollars on a gold and platinum and diamond and anitmatter 10 square mile baby crib. If they have that money and are silly enough to spend it in that, go right ahead.

As for coverage, that's where I care the least. I'm not in america, this coverage doesn't even reach me. And if it did, hey, there's probably a reason why they love doing the whole scoop on how many times the baby threw up during the night.

[someguy]

Wait, if the baby hate isn't in this thread why did you bring it up in the first place? I would say to just go to the Britney baby thread and talk about it if all the hate is there. We can't bash this baby either, its looks will probably melt our faces off a la Ark of the Covenant from its good genetics.

About the 'which is worse statement,' I'll break it down to an even smaller degree so you see what I mean.

Which is worse, hyperbole or stalking?

[AWP82]

Originally posted by ElderPredator
http://img327.imageshack.us/img327/9406/shilohnouveljoliepittpictures4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Mmmmm......baby! :p Baaaaby fat.....YOUUUUU FAT. FAT N' JUUICY!!!....HHUUUUURRRRRGH....

:D

Guess where I got that from. ;)

[X-Nightcrawler]

Originally posted by someguy
Wait, if the baby hate isn't in this thread why did you bring it up in the first place? I would say to just go to the Britney baby thread and talk about it if all the hate is there. We can't bash this baby either, its looks will probably melt our faces off a la Ark of the Covenant from its good genetics. How is which thread I bring it up in important? I wanted to say it because this thread reminded me of that.

Originally posted by someguy
Which is worse, hyperbole or stalking? Neither is worse than the other. But at the moment, yes, I find blind 'hate' (hyperbole or not) worse. Either way, that's a silly question because you brought up something I don't care about and see no direct relevance with what I really wanted to say.

To put it in JoBlo.com terms:

"I thought Silent Hill sucked."
"Oh really? What about House of the Dead! That's MUCH worse! Isn't it? Isn't it worse? I thought so."

The fact that there's something worse in the world doesn't make me dislike this any less.

[someguy]

I think it's a good question. Why do you get all bothered over someone on the internet using a huge exaggeration to show how much they hate coverage of a celebrity's kid, yet the reason why people say that is not that bad to you. You have a weird way of seeing things I guess. I'm trying to show how what you're saying doesn't make sense to me.

Princess Diana gets killed by the paparazzi chasing her: meh

Someone on the internet says they hope the paparazzi's kids get killed in a car crash for emphasis on their anger towards them: That's too far

This is how I'm seeing it right now, and you say that you see it this way. I just think it should be the other way around.

[X-Nightcrawler]

Originally posted by someguy
I think it's a good question. Why do you get all bothered over someone on the internet using a huge exaggeration to show how much they hate coverage of a celebrity's kid, yet the reason why people say that is not that bad to you. You have a weird way of seeing things I guess. I'm trying to show how what you're saying doesn't make sense to me.

Princess Diana gets killed by the paparazzi chasing her: meh

Someone on the internet says they hope the paparazzi's kids get killed in a car crash for emphasis on their anger towards them: That's too far

This is how I'm seeing it right now, and you say that you see it this way. I just think it should be the other way around. Oh, god, sorry. Good point. I mean, after all it's a very convincing analogy.

The fact that I misread is actually making this so much easier for me.

Of course I'd get pissed if they hoped the paparazzi's kids got maimed by widebeests. How is Diana's death the paparazzi's kids' fault? How are they AT ALL important?

If you had said that someone wished the paparazzi was the one that got killed by wildebeests, then I'd have nothing to say. I have a problem against the insane blind hate against the poor innocent lad who never did anyone anything. But oh wait, because of him, there's coverage on the TV! And Newspapers! Oh boo-fucking-hoo, I see your point and hope it dies (because that would stop the coverage, right). No wait, I don't. It's still sickening.