mdpuff01
09-15-2006, 02:36 AM
At the turn of the century, ESPN counted down the 50 greatest athletes of the 20th century. Obviously there is no way a list like this can be created without debate, but in the end Michael Jordan was selected as #1. The list was based not only on athletic achievements, but on historical impact, socio-cultural impact, and impact on the athlete's sport. In the last 7 years, two athletes have affected the sports community more than any others. Lance Armstrong overcame cancer to win 7 straight Tour de Frances, as well as the AP Male Athlete of the Year award 4 times. Tiger Woods is on the fast track to becoming the first billionaire athlete, is on pace to shatter every important career golf record, and is among the most recognizable people (not just athletes) in the world. If the list was made today, where would Lance and Tiger rank? Do you think either could possibly leapfrog MJ and be considered the greatest athlete of all time?