cuckoo2
02-09-2007, 12:52 AM
I was wandering the internet the other day when I saw the writers guild list of the 101 greatest screenplays of all time. I had seen the list before, but this time something stuck out at me. To kill a mockingbird was very high on the list. Now the reason I bring this up is that I haven't read the book in a while but have seen the movie recently, and from what I remember the movie was pretty faithful to the book in the sense that not really much changed. So does that make it one of the best screenplays of all time if the writer simply read the book and wrote it down on different paper? Now, I'm not trying to pick on horton foote,the writer of to kill a mockingbird, or the movie but adapted screenplays in general.
My question is how does one judge a good adapted screenplay? If the book's already good, then the script is faithful to the book, does that make the movie good? Does the stature of the book decide how good the screenplay is, I don't know?
Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor to me are the only people that I can understand why their adapted screenplays are so well liked and praised. In an interview they said that how they adapt a book, is that they read the book, throw it away, then write their own version of the story that usually ends up better than the book itself.
This to me is how adapted screenplays should be judged. That a movie has such a great screenplay, and it only just got the idea from the book and did not take everything else from it. IN a sense, how different the movie is from the book without making it a totally differerent story.
NOw even though I've posted my thoughts I would really appreciate what you guys have to say about this. Maybe I'm judging things way to wrong and maybe scripts like to kill a mockingbird are the best of all time. BUt I need someone to explain to me why?
My question is how does one judge a good adapted screenplay? If the book's already good, then the script is faithful to the book, does that make the movie good? Does the stature of the book decide how good the screenplay is, I don't know?
Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor to me are the only people that I can understand why their adapted screenplays are so well liked and praised. In an interview they said that how they adapt a book, is that they read the book, throw it away, then write their own version of the story that usually ends up better than the book itself.
This to me is how adapted screenplays should be judged. That a movie has such a great screenplay, and it only just got the idea from the book and did not take everything else from it. IN a sense, how different the movie is from the book without making it a totally differerent story.
NOw even though I've posted my thoughts I would really appreciate what you guys have to say about this. Maybe I'm judging things way to wrong and maybe scripts like to kill a mockingbird are the best of all time. BUt I need someone to explain to me why?