PDA

View Full Version : McCain, Brownback Didn't Read Iraq NIE


Brando @$$ Fat
06-05-2007, 09:27 PM
http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2007/06/05/681730.html&cvqh=itn_gopdebate



McCain, Brownback Didn't Read Iraq NIE
By GLEN JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer
1 hour ago

MANCHESTER, N.H. - Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Sam Brownback of Kansas both admitted Tuesday night they voted to authorize the U.S. military invasion of Iraq without reading the formal National Intelligence Estimate in advance.

The confession drew a jab from former Gov. Jim Gilmore of Virginia in the opening moments of a presidential campaign debate. Members of Congress "ought to read at least that kind of material," he said.

Rep. Duncan Hunter of California said he had, the only member of Congress on the debate stage to make the claim.

The war dominated the opening moments of the debate, two nights after Democratic presidential hopefuls stood on the same stage at St. Anselm College in the nation's first primary state.

Both McCain and Brownback said they had received numerous briefings on the situation in Iraq before they cast their votes in 2002.

McCain said the invasion was the correct decision, arguing that international sanctions designed to prevent Saddam Hussein from developing weapons of mass destruction were breaking down.

He said the Iraqi dictator had used the weapons against his own people and "if he had gotten them again he'd have used them again."

Brownback also said he had received briefings on the issue. He went on to say he would propose legislation in the Senate on Wednesday to divide Iraq into three regions, controlled by the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds.

National intelligence estimates are compilations of the best thinking of U.S. intelligence agencies, meant to provide the broadest guidance to government policymakers.

But they can be wrong. A 2002 assessment, for example, concluded that Iraq had continued its development of weapons of mass destruction, held arsenals of chemical and biological weapons and "probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade."

McCain drew loud applause from the partisan debate audience when he turned a question about the war in Iraq into criticism of the leading Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

"When Senator Clinton says this is Mr. Bush's war, President Bush's war," she is wrong, he said. "When President Clinton was in power, I didn't say Bosnia was President Clinton's war," the Arizona senator said.

"Presidents don't lose wars. Political parties don't lose wars. Nations lose wars," he added.

The debate drew 10 Republican presidential contenders in all _ but not former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee, an actor apparently poised to join the race in a month's time.

"My name is Thompson. I'm the candidate, not the actor," said former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson in a jab at the man who wasn't there.

Controversial immigration legislation dominated the run-up to the debate.

"Do I think it's perfect? No. I would remind you the Democrats are in majority in both houses now and we have to deal with them to resolve this issue," McCain said in a campaign stop during the day.

McCain stands alone among GOP hopefuls in backing the bipartisan bill. The measure would tighten security on the Mexican border while allowing many of the 12 million illegal immigrants a chance to stay in the United States and eventually become citizens.

He has faced criticism from his rivals who oppose the measure, in particular Mitt Romney and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., who contends the bill would grant amnesty to illegal aliens.

Also participating in the debate were former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Govs. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas and Ron Paul of Texas.

On Tuesday, Tancredo stood outside Republican Sen. Judd Gregg's New Hampshire office and said he would start a petition drive and volunteer network to help voters campaign against senators who support the White House-backed immigration plan.

"For a Republican to be talking about other Republicans, trying to take them on and defeat them in primaries, that's a somewhat injudicious thing for me to do. But this is an issue that surpasses all the niceties that go along with political camaraderie that you develop," Tancredo said.

Gregg has said he won't decide how to vote until he's seen all the details of the bill. He dismissed people who use "a jingoistic and demagogic approach of opposition to immigrants as a way to raise their own political visibility."

Romney has complained that a so-called Z visa included in the immigration legislation would allow the 12 million illegal immigrants already in the country to remain indefinitely, letting them jump ahead of other foreigners seeking to emigrate legally. He has proposed making the visas temporary, forcing recipients to seek permanent immigrant status or leave the country.

Nonetheless, one of his top economic advisers, N. Gregory Mankiw, former chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, signed an op-ed piece in Tuesday's Dallas Morning News supporting the bill.

"This is the most far-reaching and thoughtful reform of our immigration system in four decades and one that will significantly enhance American competitiveness," wrote Mankiw and his co-signers, including Jack Kemp, the 1996 Republican vice presidential nominee. "The benefits of the bill far outweigh its shortcomings. We believe it offers the only realistic way forward, and urge conservatives _ and all Americans _ to embrace the promise it holds out."

The debate was sponsored by CNN, WMUR-TV and the New Hampshire Union Leader. The host was Saint Anselm College, which also hosted a Democratic debate on Sunday.

__________________________


What a couple of fucking degenerate pieces of shit. They voted to authorize a fucking war without reading the document which would explain the REASON FOR THE FUCKING WAR IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!! The more I think about it, John McCain deserved to get raped for eight years in a P.O.W. camp.

Lynn7
06-05-2007, 11:42 PM
Wow. That's harsh.

Do you think most senators and reps read all these bills? No one reads that stuff. They should but they don't. They stick their fingers in the wind and see what their voters want. The voters are who keeps them in office and they want to please them. Every so often there is someone brave in office who does not function like that. They may not last long though.

Brando @$$ Fat
06-06-2007, 12:07 AM
Originally posted by Lynn7
Wow. That's harsh.

Do you think most senators and reps read all these bills? No one reads that stuff. They should but they don't. They stick their fingers in the wind and see what their voters want. The voters are who keeps them in office and they want to please them. Every so often there is someone brave in office who does not function like that. They may not last long though.

I was harsh but I do think it was appropriate. I do understand that a lot of senators and reps don't read every bill, but then again not every bill is an authorization of war. It's one thing if a senator doesn't want to read some abortion bill, but if it's a bill to authorize war....there is no excuse not to read it. In fact, I have no doubt that there were Democratic senators who didn't read the bill either. There is no excuse why they shouldn't have read this. We elect these people to represent us, but that doesn't necessarily mean saying "yay" or "nay." In fact, I know it sounds extreme, but I think purposely not reading a bill like this should be grounds for impeachment from the senate, no matter how they end up voting. I'm dead serious. We were talking about the 50's in another thread, do you think the senators back then would have avoided the contents of a bill like this? No, because back then we actually had leaders.

Every shred of respect I've ever had for McCain is dead. He's a horrible leader and a terrible senator.

Thrizzle
06-06-2007, 12:13 AM
I really don't think politicians vote according to what their constituents want. If that were true we wouldnt be breathing in dangerous smog, paying through the nose for healthcare, paying subsidies to the oil companies, fighting in Iraq, etc etc.

It was apparent to me during the debate tonight that none of these Republican nominees deserve to be president. They are simply way off base or disingenious.

Vong
06-06-2007, 12:20 AM
You can't blame McCain really, he is really just following the tenet of the Republican party: follow blindly and don't ask questions.

EVILxxx
06-06-2007, 02:01 AM
I think the statistics are something like 2/3rds of congress didn't read it/didn't read most of it, to include Senator Clinton.

boombche_stum
06-06-2007, 02:49 AM
Originally posted by Brando @$$ Fat
I was harsh but I do think it was appropriate. I do understand that a lot of senators and reps don't read every bill, but then again not every bill is an authorization of war. It's one thing if a senator doesn't want to read some abortion bill, but if it's a bill to authorize war....there is no excuse not to read it. In fact, I have no doubt that there were Democratic senators who didn't read the bill either. There is no excuse why they shouldn't have read this. We elect these people to represent us, but that doesn't necessarily mean saying "yay" or "nay." In fact, I know it sounds extreme, but I think purposely not reading a bill like this should be grounds for impeachment from the senate, no matter how they end up voting. I'm dead serious. We were talking about the 50's in another thread, do you think the senators back then would have avoided the contents of a bill like this? No, because back then we actually had leaders.

Every shred of respect I've ever had for McCain is dead. He's a horrible leader and a terrible senator.

I personally never really had respect for McCain. But that's besides the point. Thing is, most senators will go with what the popular sentiment is at the time. That way, if it succeeds.... they can take credit. And if it fails, they can blame it on the administration. (Hence why so many purposely didn't read it, they needed grounds to blame someone other than themselves for allowing it to happen).

MadsenOMC
06-06-2007, 09:36 AM
Originally posted by Lynn7
Do you think most senators and reps read all these bills? No one reads that stuff. They should but they don't. They stick their fingers in the wind and see what their voters want. The voters are who keeps them in office and they want to please them. Every so often there is someone brave in office who does not function like that. They may not last long though.

Does this excuse it? McCain has been the most vocal supporter of this war outside of the administration. He has made it one of the focal points of his campaign for president. Is it really too much to ask that he actually read an intelligence report? If he were a Democrat you'd tear him to shreds, but since he's not, you make excuses. That is called blind loyalty. You take Ronald Reagan's 11th Commandment to heart.

shoe1985
06-06-2007, 10:26 AM
After watching both conventions, I am at a lost for words. I don't think anybody is good enough for President. Lets hear them talk about the issues without saying this person has it wrong and here is what to do to fix it. Provide some good, fresh ideas. Obama did fine, but he seemed way off during the convention. Hillary had no idea what she was doing. Edwards was just throwing crap out to create tension. Same on the Repub sign. It is all about being against the President. What is going on here?

Vong
06-06-2007, 12:34 PM
Originally posted by shoe1985
After watching both conventions, I am at a lost for words. I don't think anybody is good enough for President. Lets hear them talk about the issues without saying this person has it wrong and here is what to do to fix it. Provide some good, fresh ideas. Obama did fine, but he seemed way off during the convention. Hillary had no idea what she was doing. Edwards was just throwing crap out to create tension. Same on the Repub sign. It is all about being against the President. What is going on here?

Hmm, you'd think that if others like you thought the same way, they would push for a third party.

shoe1985
06-06-2007, 12:45 PM
Originally posted by Vong
Hmm, you'd think that if others like you thought the same way, they would push for a third party.

There is one, but since so many people believe it must be either Repub or Dem, it won't ever happen.

I was all for McCain or Obama, but they did nothing to show me they were the right person for the job.

It is the same I have seen the last 7 years of Bush in office. They bicker about the same stuff and don't offer any good ideas. Bash this guy, or bash that guy. Someone needs to stand up and not be afraid to say this is what we should do. Instead we get that, then a week later they are changing their minds because probably their lobbyists didn't like the idea.

MadsenOMC
06-06-2007, 12:56 PM
www.unity08.com/

Lynn7
06-06-2007, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by EVILxxx
I think the statistics are something like 2/3rds of congress didn't read it/didn't read most of it, to include Senator Clinton.

And the rest are lying ;)

QUENTIN
06-06-2007, 09:55 PM
My roommate is a congressional intern and among his duties are reading upcoming bills to be voted on and taking notes for the congressman. These notes are then passed on to someone higher-up in the congressman's staff who reads the notes and recommends to the congressman how to vote on the bill. Keep in mind this is an unpaid 20-year-old kid taking notes on some things as important as the upcoming immigration legislation.That's standard practice with everyone in Washington. I wouldn't be surprised if many senators had never read any of the bills they voted on, the vast majority certainly don't.

This is a big part of the reason our system is completely fucked. I agree with Brando that this should be grounds for impeachment, because I'd like to see everyone kicked out of congress and at least a handful of people who aren't corporate funded asshole yes-men get into power.

shoe1985
06-07-2007, 09:29 AM
Originally posted by QUENTIN
My roommate is a congressional intern and among his duties are reading upcoming bills to be voted on and taking notes for the congressman. These notes are then passed on to someone higher-up in the congressman's staff who reads the notes and recommends to the congressman how to vote on the bill. Keep in mind this is an unpaid 20-year-old kid taking notes on some things as important as the upcoming immigration legislation.That's standard practice with everyone in Washington. I wouldn't be surprised if many senators had never read any of the bills they voted on, the vast majority certainly don't.

This is a big part of the reason our system is completely fucked. I agree with Brando that this should be grounds for impeachment, because I'd like to see everyone kicked out of congress and at least a handful of people who aren't corporate funded asshole yes-men get into power.

Well, since most people are on vacation so much that serve in office, I guess it makes sense why the country is so messed up. I remember asking candidates this past year in my state about certain bills and they didn't know what I was talking about. Lets just say the majority of those people are no longer in office now.