BigSugar
07-09-2007, 04:09 AM
I read a piece in an old Entertainemt Weekly over the weekend. An OP/ED about the ratings system in the U.S., the thrust of it being that Hostel 2 was so violent that it went way past the R rating it received and should have been completely off limits to children. This is the only part of the article I somewhat agree with. Now, they guy goes on to say that, with an R rating, kids could technically be allowed to see this movies as long as they were with a parent, which is of course true. However, what this guy went on to say was that parents need to have this decision taken out of their hands by the ratings board. This is where the guy goes right into la-la land for me. No, I don't advocate Hostel 2 as a film fir for todlers, but if someone is so lazy-assed, silly, howl-at-the-moon fucking stupid as to take their kid to see this flick, then so fucking be it. I don't think you can say we need to strengthen the American family in the same breath as you say we need to strip parents of the right to choose what their kids watch, for good or ill. Yes, whenever I see a five-year-old in one of those films, I want to crack their parents' skulls open just to see if indeed they did have a brain in there. But the fact of the matter is, that's not my kid. And I have absolutely no right to decide a goddamned thing for that child, no matter how fucked up their parents may be.
The rating process is totally clandestine, but the results are right there on the posters and trailers. Now, if a parent can't bring themselves to make and enforce a decision about what their child watches in the theater and on T.V., isn't there a bigger issue here like NEGLECT that should be solved first before we go after movies? Not only that, but 99% of the time, this horseshit is coming from the mouths of religiosos who WEAR A FUCKING CROSS AROUND THEIR NECK! Folks who carry the symbol of their Lord and Savior being nailed to two pieces of wood! This is to say nothing of the hymns that invoke themselves being washed in blood, often sung after consuming symbols of said Lord's flesh and blood. From an objective point of view, which is worse for kids?
I want to keep kids out of horror films as much as anyone, but shouldn't that be a responsibility left to the parents? Sounds to me like some of these wonderbread motherfuckers need to get off of their asses and do some actual parenting instead of asking the state to take care of their kids some more. Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
The rating process is totally clandestine, but the results are right there on the posters and trailers. Now, if a parent can't bring themselves to make and enforce a decision about what their child watches in the theater and on T.V., isn't there a bigger issue here like NEGLECT that should be solved first before we go after movies? Not only that, but 99% of the time, this horseshit is coming from the mouths of religiosos who WEAR A FUCKING CROSS AROUND THEIR NECK! Folks who carry the symbol of their Lord and Savior being nailed to two pieces of wood! This is to say nothing of the hymns that invoke themselves being washed in blood, often sung after consuming symbols of said Lord's flesh and blood. From an objective point of view, which is worse for kids?
I want to keep kids out of horror films as much as anyone, but shouldn't that be a responsibility left to the parents? Sounds to me like some of these wonderbread motherfuckers need to get off of their asses and do some actual parenting instead of asking the state to take care of their kids some more. Just my opinion, I could be wrong.