PDA

View Full Version : You are a professional reviewer! Do research!


Backstabba
08-10-2007, 12:31 PM
This could be just a personal thing that irked me, and maybe since the guy was seeing a movie based on a book based on a true story, he might've assumed. So, I might be overreacting. But this review (
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/review/1033)...bleh.

I was reading a review for "Jack Ketchum's The Girl Next Door", a movie based on the book which is loosely based on the Sylvia Liken murder. I say loosely because the book basically takes everything from the original crime and does it's best to make it more shocking.

Now here's the first paragraph from the review on Bloodydisgusting.com.

"Think you know pain? You don’t know *beep* Sylvia Likens knew pain. In 1958 she was locked in the basement of her foster home, and tortured for weeks and weeks, until she was dead. She was starved, denied the use of a bathroom, forced to eat her own excrements, raped, and beaten by the kids of the neighborhood. Her foster family would invite kids over from the neighborhood to drink beers, smoke cigarettes, burn and penetrate a tied up 13 year old girl in the cellar, as long as they didn’t tell anyone. It went on for around three months, until poor Sylvia Likens died. It was, as someone at the actual trial had stated, "the most terrible crime ever committed in the state of Indiana".

Not trying to say that what she suffered wasn't bad, or etc. But this guy has it all wrong. It was 1965, she was never raped, she was 13. I understand that not everyone is a walking encyclopedia (or dictionary, since I probably spelled enclyclopedia wrong) but...come on man.

Feel free to disregard this rant, I just needed to "get 'er out".

RustyRazor
08-10-2007, 01:05 PM
I think if you're going to be given a job where what you write goes out for many people to see, your facts SHOULD all be accurate.
At least, if you want to be seen as a credible writer.

Backstabba
08-10-2007, 01:16 PM
Originally posted by RustyRazor
I think if you're going to be given a job where what you write goes out for many people to see, your facts SHOULD all be accurate.
At least, if you want to be seen as a credible writer.

....*phew*
For a second I thought that was a "Well maybe YOU should try it!" comment.

Damone
08-10-2007, 01:39 PM
I'm not that familiar with this guy but is he actually a "professional" reviewer or just a shade tree critic who contacted the webmaster and said, "I can write reviews for you!"?

RustyRazor
08-11-2007, 10:22 AM
Originally posted by Damone
I'm not that familiar with this guy but is he actually a "professional" reviewer or just a shade tree critic who contacted the webmaster and said, "I can write reviews for you!"?

Sitting in his mom's basement, his little sister yelling cause he's hogging the computer and she can't get onto the Webkinz site.

Bingo, D.
Bingo.

Scarfather
08-11-2007, 09:10 PM
Well..

It's "Bloody Disgusting"

He's not working for a credible publication with standards.

Bomont the Destroyer
08-12-2007, 01:51 AM
I believe they changed a couple of things from the book and just set the movie in 1958 instead of 1965. On the IMDB External Reviews page the review from Dread Central also says it's set in 1958. Here's the link:
http://dreadcentral.com/index.php?name=Reviews&req=showcontent&id=1392

someguy
08-13-2007, 01:50 PM
Originally posted by Backstabba
she was never raped

In the excerpt you posted, he said penetrated. According to the wiki for the incident

"Soon after, Baniszewski again accused Sylvia of prostitution, and forced her to strip and masturbate with a Coca Cola bottle for a group of neighborhood boys."

So, she was penetrated.

Backstabba
08-13-2007, 02:10 PM
Originally posted by someguy
In the excerpt you posted, he said penetrated. According to the wiki for the incident

"Soon after, Baniszewski again accused Sylvia of prostitution, and forced her to strip and masturbate with a Coca Cola bottle for a group of neighborhood boys."

So, she was penetrated.

.......fuck.

I guess I just misread it a couple (ten) times. When I read penetrate my brain said "rape?".

I ban the use of the word "irony" from now on in this thread.

Badbird
08-14-2007, 02:59 PM
I've caught our local KC Star film critic/snob making several little errors. Usually they are facts pertaining to "genre" movies he feels are beneath him. But a mistake is a mistake. He's credited movies to the wrong director or actors more than once, or even got years wrong. Little things like that irk me.

But the one that really got me was when he reviewed Jet Li's movie "The Hitman" (I think that's what it was called) which played at an art house theater here shortly after Lethal Weapon 4 came out, he started the review with a line like: "We are so used to seeing Jet Li as a steely-eyed villain that to see him as the hero is a bit jarring..."

Then I remembered specifically in interviews for Lethal Weapon 4, Jet Li said the movie was hard for him specifically because he had never played a bad guy before.

I'm not up on my Jet Li history, but I very much remember that. So the street cred my critic tried to earn with his "I watch kung fu movies" line was just a joke.