PDA

View Full Version : THE RETURN OF BEN AFFLECK ACTOR. :)


yorrick brown
12-18-2007, 05:32 PM
from chud.moviehole.com

Kevin MacDonald must be getting an ulcer. His follow-up to The Last King of Scotland, State of Play, has been anything but smooth sailing even before a frame of film is shot. The script got rewritten a number of times, going between writers all the way up to the strike. Then star Brad Pitt, unhappy with the latest draft, up and quit the movie. That created a major panic, since the film needed to get started by a certain date in order to accommodate all the other actors. A flurry of activity saw MacDonald just about on his hands and knees, begging Russell Crowe to replace Pitt. The actor agreed and it seemed like the bad days for State of Play were over.

Not. Now Ed Norton has quit the movie and MacDonald is back in last minute negotiations mode, trying to get Ben Affleck into the role. Norton was one of those actors whose schedules were so unforgiving that any change in State of Play's shooting would present a problem. That problem became presented when the film was pushed back to a January start date for Crowe. Apparently the exit is amicable, unlike with Pitt, where Universal made lots of noise about suing the actor.

So for those playing at home, Ben Affleck is now a rising politician caught up in a murder investigation. Russell Crowe is now the investigative journalist who once worked on the politician's campaign and is now romancing his wife. The rest of the cast, including Helen Mirren, Rachel McAdams, Robin Wright Penn and Jason Bateman have not yet quit, although apparently things are looking tight on Mirren's schedule. That sounds so dirty.

Here's to hoping this all works out. I liked but did not love The Last King of Scotland, and Hollywoodland and Gone Baby Gone have put me squarely back in the Ben Affleck camp, so I'd like to see him doing more good work and getting recognition for it.

Monotreme
12-19-2007, 11:31 AM
Well I have to admit, this doesn't sound good... last minute changes in the cast means they don't have enough time for research, and although the pairing of Ed Norton and Russell Crowe was irresistable to me, I just can't see Crowe and Affleck working, at all. Affleck's good - just see Hollywoodland for his best performance - but he's just not good enough to match Crowe. Norton would have been. I have to admit I'm quite disappointed, but Crowe is still in this so I'm still interested.

ilovemovies
12-19-2007, 11:45 AM
I disagree. I can't wait to see Crowe and Affleck appear together on screen. That sounds like an awesome pairing.

I actually kind of like Affleck more than Norton. Don't get me wrong, I like Norton but I do find him sometimes to be a tad overpraised. While Affleck is almost always underrated. The dude was awesome in Daredevil yet his performance seemed to get very mixed reaction with a lot saying he was wrong for the part. But I thought he couldn't have been better.

JJFlamingo
12-19-2007, 01:45 PM
NEVER have had a problem with Affleck as an actor, he's underrated really, and gets a lot of shit he doesn't deserve...

xseanymacx
12-19-2007, 02:09 PM
I don't know many who shit on Affleck's talent...just his movie choices.

drugs and hugs
12-19-2007, 05:00 PM
affleck was the bomb in phantoms yo

DareDevil
12-19-2007, 06:06 PM
Yah... I'd rather see Affleck and Norton... or Affleck and Pitt but this will do... Flecks the man.

bigred760
12-23-2007, 06:23 PM
I have no problem seeing Crowe and Affleck onscreen; I think the only problem fanboys will have is not seeing Pitt and Norton reteam.

drugs and hugs
12-23-2007, 06:27 PM
I have no problem seeing Crowe and Affleck onscreen; I think the only problem fanboys will have is not seeing Pitt and Norton reteam.


I think fight club was a one off.Theres no way a PITT and NORTON re team would be as good.Now DAMON and AFFLECK re team on the other hand :).