PDA

View Full Version : Hard Hobbit to break: McKellen set for return as Gandalf


edonline
03-26-2008, 08:40 AM
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2268132,00.html

Hard Hobbit to break: McKellen set for return as Gandalf

Staff and agencies
Wednesday March 26, 2008
guardian.co.uk

Sir Ian McKellen looks set to reprise his role as Gandalf in the long-awaited adaptation of JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit.

The Lord of the Rings actor all but confirmed he will wear the wizard's robes again in an email exchange with fans on his official website. Asked "Will you again be our Gandalf in The Hobbit now that the deal is settled?" McKellen answers: "Yes I will, if Peter Jackson and I have anything to do with it, he being the producer and me being, on the whole a very lucky actor."

Sir Ian said last year he would be "very pleased" to portray Gandalf again, but at the time it was unsure whether an adaptation would see the light of day. Jackson and studio New Line were locked in a bitter feud over the earnings from the Lord of the Rings trilogy - preventing an adaptation of The Hobbit from going ahead. The battle has now been resolved and two films based on The Hobbit are planned, with Peter Jackson serving as executive producer.

A formal deal with McKellen has yet to be signed, but filming is set to begin next year. In the email exchange, a fan asks the 68-year-old actor: "Have you been approached yet by Peter Jackson or anyone else about reprising your wonderful role as Gandalf for the two upcoming Hobbit movies?". He answers: "Encouragingly, Peter and Fran Walsh have told me they couldn't imagine The Hobbit without their original Gandalf. Their confidence hasn't yet been confirmed by the director Guillermo del Toro but I am keeping my diary free for 2009!"

Del Toro is planning two films based on The Hobbit. The first will follow the plot of the children's book, in which Bilbo Baggins sets out with a band of dwarves to reclaim their treasure from a dragon called Smaug. The second film, according to an outline by Jackson, will cover the 80 years between Baggins' triumphant return and the beginning of the Lord of the Rings. The budget is projected to be around $150m (£78m) for the two films and will be released in 2010 and 2011.

McKellen portrayed Gandalf in the three Lord of the Rings movies, one of the biggest box-office successes of all time, and earned a best supporting actor Oscar nomination for his role in 2002. The Hobbit, first published in 1937, describes the adventures of Bilbo Baggins as he joins Gandalf and a group of dwarves in a quest to reclaim a dragon's treasure. During the quest, he discovers the powerful trinket that goes on to play a central role in the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

vesaker
03-26-2008, 09:46 AM
Good to see they are getting him back seeing as he's the only other character from LotR's that is in the Hobbit aside from Bilbo, if i remeber correctly.

Kings-Rook1
03-26-2008, 11:58 AM
It just wouldn't be the same without him.

thedudeman69
03-26-2008, 12:41 PM
Oh that is fucking sweet. This is going to be epic now.

AspectRatio1986
03-26-2008, 01:23 PM
yessssssssssss

DareDevil
03-26-2008, 05:21 PM
Wait... Del Toro is directing the Hobbit... I thought that was only speculation.... well that's pretty kick ass... like I wanted Peter back as much as the next guy... but they actualy went with the only person who was a decent logical choice.

X-Nightcrawler
03-26-2008, 05:54 PM
I kinda wanted LOTR to get out of our lives, but it might be interesting if Del Toro really does direct it.

Monotreme
03-26-2008, 05:59 PM
Del Toro does seem to be lined up to start production immediately on this. Wow this is really quite exciting!

Give McKellen the Oscar already!!

biff_debris
03-26-2008, 07:46 PM
YAYUS, this is going to rock.

FrancisBuxton
03-26-2008, 08:21 PM
W00t! Best casting news I've heard all week!

Cronos
03-27-2008, 07:12 AM
Excellent, good that they're getting him back, he's perfect as Gandalf and it wouldn't be right if they got somebody else.

Lost in Space
03-27-2008, 11:18 AM
Thank fucking god....

honestly how long did you think it was goign to take before i found this thread

Shockwave
03-27-2008, 02:56 PM
There was never any doubt.

corran horn
03-27-2008, 03:06 PM
Glad to see Gandalf the Grey is back. Now where are Andy Serkis and Hugo Weaving (as they're the only LOTR trilogy cast members who'd be returning besides McKellen).

NuclearMisfit
03-27-2008, 04:06 PM
Id like to see what Del Toro does with Smaug as long as James Earl Jones provides the voice for him i think itll be perfect. I suspect he will have many many eyes.

APzombie
03-27-2008, 04:13 PM
I kinda wanted LOTR to get out of our lives, but it might be interesting if Del Toro really does direct it.

Thats exactly how i feel. I was wiped out from 2001-2004 with the overrated trilogy, but i wouldn't mind this to see what Del Toro does with the material.

and i'll laugh at all the jackson fans if this turns out to be twice as good as the rings pictures.

NuclearMisfit
03-27-2008, 04:35 PM
Hobbit 2 is just a cash cow.

ScaryFreak1827
03-27-2008, 08:41 PM
AWESOME! I'm so glad this has been confirmed. McKellan=only actor who should ever play Gandalf. period.

AndrewDB
03-27-2008, 10:14 PM
Hobbit 2 is just a cash cow.

How do you know this? Have you seen the future?..

If not.. Cram it. :|

Shockwave
03-28-2008, 04:28 AM
Hobbit 2 is just a cash cow.

I agree, since theres no book on this its hard to refute that its being made just for $$$ purposes.

That being said, its a cash cow im really looking forward to.


I dont think Hobbits will be in part 2. Sounds like it will focus on pretty much Gandalf and the White Council.

Which is awesome. Bring back Chris Lee!

Monotreme
03-28-2008, 05:58 AM
Actually I kind of agree... while I support the split of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows into two films, making a 2-part Hobbit film is kind of over-doing it... I don't even think there is enough in the book to make 2 movies. Isn't it only like a 250-page book? I'd say a 2 1/2 hour runtime, TOPS, would do it.

corran horn
03-28-2008, 09:04 AM
Actually I kind of agree... while I support the split of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows into two films, making a 2-part Hobbit film is kind of over-doing it... I don't even think there is enough in the book to make 2 movies. Isn't it only like a 250-page book? I'd say a 2 1/2 hour runtime, TOPS, would do it.

Actually, they're not splitting THE HOBBIT in two. TH will be its own film while the second will serve as a lead-in to the LOTR trilogy. This will most likely cover events like Aragorn's youth and service in Rohan and Gondor, the White Council, Dwarven attempts to reclaim Moria, etc. The appendices are literally bursting with material, so why not?

adamjohnson
03-28-2008, 09:09 AM
Actually, they're not splitting THE HOBBIT in two. TH will be its own film while the second will serve as a lead-in to the LOTR trilogy. This will most likely cover events like Aragorn's youth and service in Rohan and Gondor, the White Council, Dwarven attempts to reclaim Moria, etc. The appendices are literally bursting with material, so why not?

Because thre is no actual STORY.

bigred760
03-28-2008, 09:24 AM
Ian McKellan back as Gandalf is great because it gives the entire franchise more of a continuity feel to it. I don't know what they're going to do with two movies; split "The Hobbit" in two, or add some stuff on their own (don't really care to be honest), but McKellan back is good news to start off with.

NuclearMisfit
03-28-2008, 09:49 AM
If they wanna do more stuff why dont they do something about Tom fucking Bombadil instead of leaving the poor guy on the cutting room floor. If they are so interested in sharing all the appendices of Middle Earth then add it to an extended edition of The Hobbit as a special feature.