PDA

View Full Version : SAW V


Dead_living1981
03-27-2008, 06:10 AM
Do we really need a Saw V?

God of War
03-27-2008, 07:13 AM
No. And we didn't need a SAW 4.

Lost in Space
03-27-2008, 11:07 AM
/agree

tbone
03-30-2008, 11:48 PM
Did we expect this not to happen though?

Le_Big_Mac
03-31-2008, 12:22 AM
Did we need a Saw II?

bigred760
03-31-2008, 12:25 AM
Do we really need a Saw V?

Really? No.

But movies are a business and the Saw movies bring in plenty of dough for whoever the hell's making the movies, so I guess you could say "they" need it.

Big Boss
03-31-2008, 04:20 AM
Yes. It's too late now. No we didn't need a "Saw II", but the way they keep linking all the damn movies together they better not stop now before everything is explained!

Lost in Space
03-31-2008, 11:52 AM
So I brought this film being made up in class today. Now i have another joblo member in my class and he and I were vastly outnumbered. I don't want to call them stupid but cinematically they don't have a whole lot of taste. My point is though, that in a class of 20, 18 people were dying to see this movie. if there is a meket for a film, especialy a sequal, it will be made

FatSakHead
03-31-2008, 12:02 PM
I have an idea to make the natural selection process for humans go a lot faster.

Have two types of tickets for Saw V when it comes out. One for critics and people who just want to see it out of sheer curiosity, to see how bad it can get. The other for people who seriously want to see it. Have two different theater rooms, one for each group. You gas the theater that the latter goes into.

Lost in Space
03-31-2008, 12:15 PM
I have an idea to make the natural selection process for humans go a lot faster.

Have two types of tickets for Saw V when it comes out. One for critics and people who just want to see it out of sheer curiosity, to see how bad it can get. The other for people who seriously want to see it. Have two different theater rooms, one for each group. You gas the theater that the latter goes into.

You just made my laugh in history class, and get in trouble....it was worth it

Grand_Marquis
03-31-2008, 01:34 PM
Hahaha...I like it. Sending them to their certain death should help them appreciate life more. ;)

FatSakHead
03-31-2008, 01:43 PM
I have an awesome idea for a Saw trap they should put in the new movie. It involves you being chained down to a chair forced to watch an entire Saw movie, but your hand rests on top of a button that will cause a gun hanging from the ceiling to blow your head off. Should you wait out the torture until the movie's over, or kill yourself quickly? Make your choice, the games have only begun.

deftdelivery
03-31-2008, 03:03 PM
I have an awesome idea for a Saw trap they should put in the new movie. It involves you being chained down to a chair forced to watch an entire Saw movie, but your hand rests on top of a button that will cause a gun hanging from the ceiling to blow your head off. Should you wait out the torture until the movie's over, or kill yourself quickly? Make your choice, the games have only begun.

Hahaha your two ideas for torture have been spot on. 2/2 in my book dude :p

What pisses me off 10,000 times more than studios cashing in on a tired franchise and just shoving more bull shit down our throats is the fact that MILLIONS OF FUCKING MORONS LOVE IT.

It's a simple fact. Without these morons, there is no market - there would be no SAW. But because a MASSIVE AMOUNT OF DUMBASSES insist on sitting through the equivalent of violent masturbation, the franchise continues. And will continue until finally enough people say ENOUGH.

So yes, while I still get irritated by Hollywood's greed, they are a business first and foremost bottom line. If America had a taste for the philosophical, oh mee oh my we'd have about 200 Thin Red Line's a year (not to say that that film is better than anything - just an example). But unfortunately, our market is full of idiotic 15 year olds who think Hostel is a mark of honor for them. Sitting through torture is "cool!" and a "wicked good time at the movies!"

And many, many, many more idiots fill out this demographic - not just teenagers. While I don't expect teenagers to know shit about what separates a good and bad film (and I'm not talking about those of us who are 18, 19 about to be off to college, but rather 12-15 year olds), I certainly would hope that older cinema-goers would be able to distinguish. But yet..alas...they cannot.

It really pisses me off:mad:

X-Nightcrawler
03-31-2008, 03:09 PM
I have an awesome idea for a Saw trap they should put in the new movie. It involves you being chained down to a chair forced to watch an entire Saw movie, but your hand rests on top of a button that will cause a gun hanging from the ceiling to blow your head off. Should you wait out the torture until the movie's over, or kill yourself quickly? Make your choice, the games have only begun.

I like it because, if we add enough quick editing and whooshing sound effects, it could really capture some profound symbolism. See, the choice of life or death is literally in your hand, and the bullet to your head symbolizes conformity brutalizing your brain, changing it to the trash human kind has become, and what JigSaw is trying to change my murdering everyone.

MadsenOMC
03-31-2008, 03:46 PM
After seeing the cinematic abortion that is Saw III, at a different site's forum I mentioned that it is likely even the filmmaker's don't like the Saw series (it's just an easy paycheck on a movie all but guaranteed to make money). Someone responded that indeed they knew this to be true. The director of Saw IV did not want to make the movie at all and he spent the entire production on his blackberry (emailing, texting & surfing the Web). He only agreed to direct it so that he could make Repo, and the only way the studio would let him direct Repo was if he also helmed Saw IV. Now people can choose to believe or not believe that story, but it seems highly plausible to me.

visual_tension
03-31-2008, 04:15 PM
Do we really need a Saw V?

No. But do we really need the majority of sequels that are released? No.

The Saw films are better and more entertaining than a lot of other crap that's released in theaters.

MadsenOMC
03-31-2008, 04:21 PM
The Saw films are better and more entertaining than a lot of other crap that's released in theaters.

That is like saying getting stabbed in the balls is better than being shot in the balls.

Lost in Space
03-31-2008, 04:51 PM
That is like saying getting stabbed in the balls is better than being shot in the balls.

I would rather be shot in the balls.

God of War
04-01-2008, 09:26 AM
I like my balls just the way they are thanks very much. :D

MadsenOMC
04-01-2008, 11:00 AM
I would rather be shot in the balls.

Let me know how that works out for you. I'm sure it is painless.

Lost in Space
04-01-2008, 11:09 AM
Let me know how that works out for you. I'm sure it is painless.

Well, Sir, put it in perspective. Being stabbed would be much slower and therefore more painful. Also a knife for the most part is larger than a bullet and would do more overall damage.

To be honest bro, I agree with what you are saying. Recently films are not what they once were. but what are we goign to do about it.

Mr.HyDe807
04-01-2008, 11:16 AM
I like it because, if we add enough quick editing and whooshing sound effects, it could really capture some profound symbolism. See, the choice of life or death is literally in your hand, and the bullet to your head symbolizes conformity brutalizing your brain, changing it to the trash human kind has become, and what JigSaw is trying to change my murdering everyone.

Then, we have an ending where if the man/woman survives, watching Saw made him kill his whole family in the other room, because there are flashbacks where the guy goes to work and neglects his family, and Jigsaw leaves a tape saying he chose him because he neglected to take his own life and watch Saw. It then goes through quick edits of everything that happened in the movie, with the camera slowly revolving on the shocked man's face, finally screaming "NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", and Jigsaw coming out and saying "Game Over", to which the guy finally kills himself over guilt......

Wait, did i just spoil the ending to Saw 5?

MadsenOMC
04-01-2008, 11:35 AM
Because a knife is larger than a bullet, it does more damage? I've never been shot or stabbed, but I'm pretty sure that's not how it works. Anyway, you're reading too much into it. The point was that neither option is a pleasant one.

X-Nightcrawler
04-01-2008, 11:49 AM
A shot to the balls does 10,000 times more damage than a knife, wtf. Unless you're somehow stabbed with a bullet, it does.

. . . yes, sorry. Weird-ass thread de-railing.

Grand_Marquis
04-01-2008, 03:05 PM
Yeah, I think we all completely missed the point of that analogy...


Then, we have an ending where if the man/woman survives, watching Saw made him kill his whole family in the other room, because there are flashbacks where the guy goes to work and neglects his family, and Jigsaw leaves a tape saying he chose him because he neglected to take his own life and watch Saw. It then goes through quick edits of everything that happened in the movie, with the camera slowly revolving on the shocked man's face, finally screaming "NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", and Jigsaw coming out and saying "Game Over", to which the guy finally kills himself over guilt.

Don't forget all the reveals! As we the audience are taken on a 'remember this?' trip through the movie we already watched, the camera will show us extra bits from all the scenes, like how it turns out if the scene had panned just a little bit to the left during that one quality moment with Jigsaw's assistant, we would've discovered that she had been DRINKING CHOCOLATE MILK!!! :eek: And also, by the window sill during the scene where that one guy was being slowly ripped in half with his own toenails, there's a PENCIL! And it's a NUMBER 2!!! Had we only known!!
:rolleyes:

Tyler_Durden_208
04-02-2008, 10:20 AM
Don't forget all the reveals! As we the audience are taken on a 'remember this?' trip through the movie we already watched, the camera will show us extra bits from all the scenes, like how it turns out if the scene had panned just a little bit to the left during that one quality moment with Jigsaw's assistant, we would've discovered that she had been DRINKING CHOCOLATE MILK!!! :eek: And also, by the window sill during the scene where that one guy was being slowly ripped in half with his own toenails, there's a PENCIL! And it's a NUMBER 2!!! Had we only known!!
:rolleyes:

Why do they never take the time to stop and look?
"Dead... All dead..." ;)

jaw2929
04-02-2008, 02:50 PM
I'm all over this motherfucker. I LOVE the SAW series, all fucking 4 of them. I don't give a fuck what you think about that. I want there to be 50 fucking SAW movies (which knowing Hollywood, there probably will be) and I will see each and every fucking one of them opening weekend, gaddamn it! Yes, I'm 100% serious too!

corran horn
04-02-2008, 03:45 PM
No, we do not need another of these celluloidal atrocities. While I am strongly against torture and, in all but the most extreme circumstances, capital punishment, I would gladly let those objections slide when it comes to the shady suits who greenlight this and the people who enjoy it. Those who see it b/c it's part of their duties as critics (at least they get paid to see it) or out of morbid curiosity will be allowed to see it unharmed, and if they are angry enough, they can freely participate in the torture of the fans and makers (no executions though, we have enough vigilantes as it is; we don't need roving executioners).

A less grisly option, spray the movie tickets of the fans with a chemical that renders them impotent and slowly physically rots their brain (ticket handlers should wear gloves). That way, they will be prevented from having equally stupid (or worse, more stupid) children and will soon be confined to mental wards, thus cleaning up our education system and releasing society from the deathgrip of stupidity.