Lindsey
04-27-2008, 02:14 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v67/Bikini_Babe06/Gwen.jpg
View the rest of the pictures HERE (http://www.celebitchy.com/11167/london_premiere_of_iron_man_featuring_gwyneth_palt row_wearing_another_too-short_dress/). Although that site wasn't the biggest fan of Paltrow, noir her dress:
(From CeleBitchy) (http://www.celebitchy.com/11167/london_premiere_of_iron_man_featuring_gwyneth_palt row_wearing_another_too-short_dress/)
Dear Gwyneth Paltrow: you fail. You had a very good formula going with painfully fashion-forward shoes and non-hideous outfits that managed to reach at least to mid thigh. You ruined it by falling back on an old misguided habit of showing off your gorgeous legs with dresses meant for a shorter woman. Plus, those shoes are a cop out. You were supposed to wear towering studded monstrosities to your premiere to cap off a month of shoe risks. This is a disappointment, but I’m glad you no longer challenge my long held assumptions about you. Now go back to talking about how great England is and how stupid and slow-minded Americans are, and we’ll keep snickering at your foolish fashion. Those shoes were just a whim, much like our brief admiration of you.
I think she looks pretty damn good! She's only 35, and has a killer body... so I don't see what the huge fuss is about. Sure the dress is a little too damn short, but when you have the body for it... why not? My only real beef with Gwyneth is for naming her kid Apple, and for dissing Americans for not being as intelligent as Brits. (We're all equal, damn it!) However, I do think its pretty neat that they chose Simon Pegg to be the godfather for their child! And of course you can't forget Paltrow's mother is the wonderful Blythe Danner!
Now how short is that dress? It's either her vagina or ass thats poking out. I'll let you be the judge of that:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v67/Bikini_Babe06/a42972_009__oPt.jpg
View the rest of the pictures HERE (http://www.celebitchy.com/11167/london_premiere_of_iron_man_featuring_gwyneth_palt row_wearing_another_too-short_dress/). Although that site wasn't the biggest fan of Paltrow, noir her dress:
(From CeleBitchy) (http://www.celebitchy.com/11167/london_premiere_of_iron_man_featuring_gwyneth_palt row_wearing_another_too-short_dress/)
Dear Gwyneth Paltrow: you fail. You had a very good formula going with painfully fashion-forward shoes and non-hideous outfits that managed to reach at least to mid thigh. You ruined it by falling back on an old misguided habit of showing off your gorgeous legs with dresses meant for a shorter woman. Plus, those shoes are a cop out. You were supposed to wear towering studded monstrosities to your premiere to cap off a month of shoe risks. This is a disappointment, but I’m glad you no longer challenge my long held assumptions about you. Now go back to talking about how great England is and how stupid and slow-minded Americans are, and we’ll keep snickering at your foolish fashion. Those shoes were just a whim, much like our brief admiration of you.
I think she looks pretty damn good! She's only 35, and has a killer body... so I don't see what the huge fuss is about. Sure the dress is a little too damn short, but when you have the body for it... why not? My only real beef with Gwyneth is for naming her kid Apple, and for dissing Americans for not being as intelligent as Brits. (We're all equal, damn it!) However, I do think its pretty neat that they chose Simon Pegg to be the godfather for their child! And of course you can't forget Paltrow's mother is the wonderful Blythe Danner!
Now how short is that dress? It's either her vagina or ass thats poking out. I'll let you be the judge of that:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v67/Bikini_Babe06/a42972_009__oPt.jpg