PDA

View Full Version : Scream 4

Goundrill
10-10-2001, 03:01 PM
What's this I hear first the Scream Trilogy was fucking ace. And now Scream 4 this is should be one fucking ace film so what the fuck do you think?

Should they do this or should they not?
Chris_foster14
10-10-2001, 03:03 PM
Er... They fucking should.
EBastard
10-10-2001, 03:26 PM
And kill an already dying franchise? No way.
Horror whore
10-10-2001, 03:29 PM
No...The trilogy was good..but we don't want overkill....Although "Wes Craven's New Scream" http://www.joblo.com/ubb/wink.gif could be cool...
Goundrill
10-11-2001, 07:35 AM
Yeah, thinking about it the trilogy was good theres no point in making a saga. But I also agree with Horror Whore "Wes Cravens New Scream" would be good. I can just see it Neve Campbell as Herself
Ghostface as Himself

He He He
Chris_foster14
10-11-2001, 09:15 AM
Yeah sure.
Zing!
10-11-2001, 01:32 PM
I think instead of "Scream 4" they should make a full length feature called "Stab" that really, really lampoons today's slasher flicks. It shouldn't be an outright comedy like "Scary Movie," but should be so tongue-in-cheek, so absurdly lame that it will be funny as well as scary. There should be the ghost-face killer, Tori Spelling as Sidney, and David Schwimmer too.
moviefan!
10-11-2001, 04:02 PM
I don't like the title SCREAM 4. I think they should come up with something a little more creative. Evene "Wes Craven's New Scream" would be better. And if they put a little more suspense in it then sure...why not!
Rankosaurus
10-12-2001, 03:08 PM
NOOOOO!!!
1= Brilliant parody
2= Oops
3= Oops Oops
4= NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
Goundrill
10-15-2001, 07:13 AM
I think your right Rankosaurus.

Lets change the topic slightly

What about Wes Cravens New Scream
joblo2
10-15-2001, 11:32 AM
The Trilogy sucked only the first Scream was good. The second and the third ones were just a copy of the original.
EBastard
10-15-2001, 03:41 PM
To me,no title of a movie is worse than Lethal Weapon 4.
Bry Bry
10-20-2001, 02:15 AM
i thought that pretty much the entire cast of SCREAM said that the third one was the last that THEY would do??

if CRAVEN and WILLIAMSON are both on deck for the fourth one, then i wanna see it..if neither are in, i say fuck it..

the last thing i wanna see is the series ruined by a horrible fourth chapter..
Bub
10-20-2001, 08:04 AM
At the end credits of 'Scream 2' on the commentary, Wes Craven says maybe he'll come back in four or five years to do another scream. He said they could call it Scream Redux.

If Craven and Williamson return then it could be good. Just stick with the gore and scares from 'Scream' and 'Scream 2'.

[This message has been edited by Bub (edited 10-20-2001).]
takayamaRyuji
10-20-2001, 12:50 PM
Sorry guys, I guess I'm in the minority that thinks that Scream films (all of them) are pretty lame. I just don't get the appeal...
Jimkrim
10-21-2001, 07:12 PM
my fav horror tril. i dont think they should risk it unless they can makeup for scream 3's disapointments
FlickJunkie
10-21-2001, 08:09 PM
I guess they shouldn't. I really liked all the Screams...

Scream (9/10)
Scream 2 (8/10)
Scream 3 (7/10)

But I think they are killing it. And I don't think they will make a fourth anyway. Not for a long time, at least. Scream 3 made a lot of money, but it didn't break $100 million like the first two.
Rankosaurus
10-22-2001, 05:27 AM
Was anyone surprised by the twists in the final two parts of the trilogy? They weren't twists though. They really didn't achieve much at all particularily the second one. The film buff and mothers charcters had been barely touched on and that film director in the third one was a bit too obscure to actually make it believeable.