Screamfreak
07-20-2000, 03:04 PM
I think S1 is the scariest and the most pure of all 3. The cast were rather unknown and therefore more ambitious actors. The direction was terrific!
S2 was funnier, it was a more bright and colorful set, but still scary, a successful sequel.
S3 was a disappointment. Courtney Cox and David Arquette acted like dried-up tomatoes, and Neve Campbell could not compensate that.
It had a lame end and the script suffered from the absence of Kevin Williamson. It was not scary, and not really funny. It felt like a movie that had to be made. The tagline sucked: first part: rules were set ??
second part: rules were bent ??
third and final part: forget the rules, all bets are off ??
Where can we have an evidence of all these things in the 3 Scream-movies??
It was a good thing to only have 1 killer in S3, but they didn't follow Kevin Williamson's outline for S2 and S3. The fact that there is more than one script is at the expense of the originality. Cotton should have been the killer in S2. Sidney should have been the killer in S3 and Dewey and Gale should have died.
S2 was funnier, it was a more bright and colorful set, but still scary, a successful sequel.
S3 was a disappointment. Courtney Cox and David Arquette acted like dried-up tomatoes, and Neve Campbell could not compensate that.
It had a lame end and the script suffered from the absence of Kevin Williamson. It was not scary, and not really funny. It felt like a movie that had to be made. The tagline sucked: first part: rules were set ??
second part: rules were bent ??
third and final part: forget the rules, all bets are off ??
Where can we have an evidence of all these things in the 3 Scream-movies??
It was a good thing to only have 1 killer in S3, but they didn't follow Kevin Williamson's outline for S2 and S3. The fact that there is more than one script is at the expense of the originality. Cotton should have been the killer in S2. Sidney should have been the killer in S3 and Dewey and Gale should have died.