PDA

View Full Version : Wolf Vs Bram Stoker's Dracula.


bulletproof
07-10-2002, 10:58 AM
After Bram Stokers Dracula was released there seemed to be a classic movie monster revival in the works.Sadly it eneded due to bad boxoffice returns by Mary Shellys Frankenstein and Mary Reily.

Which is better Dracula 92 or Wolf?

In my opinion Gary Oldman was miscast,the movie seemed like a soap opera to me,and it was boring.

Now Wolf has jack doing one of his best roles ever,has great back-up by Michelle Pheifer,a great score by Ennio Morricone,and what it would really be like to be a Werewolf.

[This message has been edited by bulletproof (edited 07-10-2002).]

Antonio
07-10-2002, 11:41 AM
I'd rank WOLF first (and agree with everything you said about it), then FRANKENSTEIN, then DRACULA (which I hated).

Requiem-for-a-Dream
07-10-2002, 04:07 PM
Dracula was much better but Wolf was fairly good.

Dracula- 8/10
Wolf- 6/10

Matt

bulletproof
07-11-2002, 08:04 AM
I remember when Dracula opened, I was watching an interwiew with Francis Ford Coppola saying Dracula was about Romance,and redemption,and Blah,blah.What a poser.

At least Mike Nichols and Jack Nicholson had the balls to say they made a horror movie.

Klownzilla
07-11-2002, 09:34 AM
WOLF rules! Nicholson and Spader kick ass in that movie....literally.