PDA

View Full Version : The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2


Cyclonus
09-26-2002, 06:19 PM
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986)

Director: Tobe Hooper

Cast: Dennis Hopper, Caroline Williams, Jim Siedow, Bill Moseley, Bill Johnson

Screenwriter: L.M. Kit Carson

Producers: Menahem Golan, Yoram Globus

A Cannon Films release


http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0792846508.01.MZZZZZZZ.gif


The second Texas Chainsaw Massacre film is one of the better horror sequels of the 1980's. Given the generally low quality of genre films from the period, especially sequels, that's not usually saying a whole lot. Nonetheless, despite its flaws, it's certainly worth the effort for horror fans. It's not as good as the original: that is asking too much; it was an unique, one-of-a-kind film, one that is perhaps best left alone. Still, the sequel does not tarnish its memory. On the contrary, it revitalizes the concept with a fresh approach. Director Tobe Hooper realized that even he would be hard-pressed to outdo his own groundbreaking film, so he wisely takes the material in a whole new direction altogether. The first Massacre was a grim, bleak horror film; the second is an over-the-top dark comedy. There's much more gore than the original, but it's so bizarre and frenetic that it's impossible to take seriously. It's done with so much panache that we can't help but hop on and go along for the ride.

The funny thing about it is that it actually does a decent job of making Leatherface sympathetic. This odd plot thread starts with a symbolic chainsaw/phallic symbol sequence that is absolutely priceless; it's intense and bizarre, the way a TCM film should be. So the guy's not evil, just misunderstood? That's right, and it works. He is actually capable of thinking of another human being as more than just fodder for the meat-grinder. No wonder this guy is killing people; it's his only outlet for sexual frustration. Makes sense, in light of some of his father's comments.

What can I say about the acting? It's all over-the-top, like the movie itself. You get to see an insane Dennis Hopper in a chainsaw duel with Leatherface; how can you go wrong with that? Absurd, but compelling in a bizarre way. Hopper can always be counted on to spice up a movie, and he certainly doesn't let us down, although he's equally effective in his quieter moments. Likewise, Jim Siedow and Bill Johnson are clearly enjoying themselves as members of the nuttiest family on the planet, and Bill Moseley is so uninhibited it's surreal. In contrast, Caroline Williams provides a center of normalcy as the heroine--until she also loses it all in the end.

This is not an unqualified recommendation, though. the first half-hour is fairly tedious, with little action to break the monotony. I know that some scenes were removed for time and content reasons, but the film does suffer for that. From what I hear, they originally depicted some more Leatherface action, which will hopefully find its way into a future special edition. As it is, the film is rough going at first, then it thankfully picks up with a terrifying sequence. From that point on, the pace rarely flags, although it gets a bit exhausting after a while. Hooper hadn't lost his touch.

6/10.

Lady Summerisle
09-26-2002, 10:01 PM
Well put!

Someone finally doesn't trash it like most non-genre fans and qualified critics.

Go Nubbins!

countchocula
09-27-2002, 04:50 PM
You pretty much summed up how I feel regarding TCM2. I'd probably give it a slightly higher rating, though. Thank God Hooper didn't try to replicate his masterpiece. He would have only embarrassed himself. Tongue-in-cheek was the only route to take...

doggyboyuk
10-02-2002, 04:39 AM
Can't say i liked this film very much doesn't do the first film any justice they should have left it as a stand alone.

Jason Voorhees
10-02-2002, 02:22 PM
Well spoken, Cy. I agree; although my rating may've been a tad higher.

Cyclonus
10-03-2002, 01:57 AM
If that first half-hour had been better, I prorbably would have given it a 7/10 instead. I still might, if MGM coughs up a special edition with that cool extra gory footage, unrated of course. They released Dressed to Kill in that format so what excuse do they have for not doing the same to TCM 2? :mad:

Bomont the Destroyer
10-09-2002, 08:40 PM
Maybe Hooper was smart and burned that extra footage. I saw it on a video copy once. Very very bad stuff. Not as bad as something like Sleepaway Camp 4 bad, but still very very bad. I think it would maybe lower your score on it, more than help it. Anyway I give it a 7/10.

radikill
10-10-2002, 02:53 PM
I saw this one way back when it was released in theaters (unrated) with a friend of mine. We both came thisclose to walking out on it.

The gore fx were incredibly cheap-looking and completely unrealistic. Combine that with a comedic storyline that 1% funny and 99% stupid, and you have a really bad movie.

2/10

janesworld
10-12-2002, 12:51 PM
I've always thought this movie would have been better received had it not been "part 2" of a legend. On its own, it's not bad. But compared with the original masterpiece, there's not a film that could stand the scrutiny.

Michael_myers
10-13-2002, 03:55 PM
the effects didn't bother me, they were done by effects guru Tom Savini. Nice bit of cheese.

teenkiller
03-10-2003, 02:52 PM
I am glad most of you enjoyed this film so much but I found it pretty annoying. Making LEATHERFACE'S persona into a lovelorn fool definitley did not sit well with me. And also the family has little time to terrorize people. I felt the only true kill in this movie was at the radio station and it was just too little. I found the original to be one of my top ten favorite movies but this sequel just pisses on everything that the original had. I would have appreciated it more if Hooper had tried to replicate the atmosphere of the original but oh well, its far too late now. I can only hope that LEATHERFACE is a much better film than this one.

My score: 4 out of 10

Well thats all for now GOoD JOURNEY my fellow schmoes.