PDA

View Full Version : Arachnid


countchocula
10-06-2002, 12:03 PM
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00005UWAC.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

MINOR SPOILERS

With Brian Yuzna attached to Arachnid as the producer, I was expecting a healthy dose of energetic cheese. But once the flick was released, it drowned in scathing reviews. This turned my expectations down a few notches, and I soon lost interest in it. Last night, it aired on the Sci-fi Channel, and since I was wallowing in boredom, I decided to give it a look. As always, low expectations paid off. It wasn’t nearly as treacherous as I was led to believe. Arrow’s review mentions an abundance of wet gore, so I knew that I wouldn’t be seeing much of it. A disappointment. Sci-fi displays their inconsistency by cutting out a supposed “eye popping” scene, but broadcasting Dog Soldiers with almost all of its violence preserved. Plus, Clive Barker’s upcoming Saint Sinner is reportedly gruesome fare. Why did they have to pick on Arachnid? Such a cruel, cruel world. Oh well, I was still entertained. Our tale of web-spinning anarchy finds extraterrestrials infecting a tropical island with otherworldly creepy crawlers. Scientists and military grunts eventually crash land on the island, and are stalked by a variety of creatures (well, two). If this sounds by-the-numbers, that’s because it is. We’ve seen this film a few times before, but it doesn’t feel entirely derivative. Our heroine hottie searches for her missing brother in a subplot similar to that of Jurassic Park III. The only difference being that this time, we actually want her to find her lost loved one. The heroine hottie I’m referring to is Alex Reid, who reminded me of Michelle Rodriguez in that she’s cute when she’s mad. Unlike Rodriguez, Reid successfully conveys more than one emotion, and isn’t limited to being the “badass chick.” The other cast members are OK. Some of them come off as natural, some of them are embarrassing, and some of them are close to incoherent thanks to thick Spanish accents.

The pace borders on lifeless. Don’t get me wrong, there’s usually something happening, but it’s just not exciting enough to take note of. And how are the arachnids, you ask? The main spider has a cool, unique look to it. There’s also a centipede/snake type of critter that looks decent, but it suffers when in cringe-inducing CGI format. Could they not find some alternative to using subpar digital effects? It sticks out like a sore thumb, and demotes chase sequences to mere scuffles. Director Jack Sholder works in some inventive camera angles and cashes in on the scenery, but most of his style is routine. I prefer his underrated work on NOES2. To Sholder’s credit, he aims high here. Arachnid takes itself fairly seriously, perhaps too seriously. I was stunned to see this film strive for emotional content. Granted, most of it falls flat, but some of it clicks. Capri’s death is surprisingly dramatic, as he slowly expires while cocooned in some intense webbing. He was actually likeable as the spider “specialist.” In other words, he didn’t just talk about spiders the entire time.

A lot of the action is rather stale. You’d think that big-breasted women having fun with machine guns would arouse me to a degree, but none of it stimulated my senses. The climax, in particular, is anticlimactic. By that point, I had grown weary of the whole ordeal, and just wanted too indulge in senseless combat, but I didn’t get it. This film just gradually loses steam until the closing credits begin to roll. Of course, it sets itself up for a sequel, which in all probability, will be made. For whatever reason, direct-to-video sequels are fashionable nowadays. I guess if you spend four dollars on CGI, it’s relatively easy to harvest a sizeable profit. And that’s all I have to say. Arachnid offers more than your average “mutant insect” adventure. I enjoyed it for what it was worth. I had predicted that it would paralyze me with monotony, but such wasn’t the case. But only rent this flick if nothing else on the video shelves looks appetizing.

My rating-3/5

Requiem-for-a-Dream
10-08-2002, 05:23 PM
Arachnid- 4/10

Rated R for mild Gore.

I normally love Brian Yuzna; his films like Return of the Living Dead 3, Faust, Dentist 1 and 2 and Progeny were all very well made if somewhat lacking in the acting department. Well, he produced this one and it has almost nothing to recommend it on. Weak acting, cliched script, really bad effects and a familiar plot don't help it either. What bugs me the most was the lack of gore, Brian Yuzna has made all of his films with a great amount of gore but as soon as he produces a flick there's almost none to be found. The directing was also pretty bad with only a few scenes worth watching for originality in camera angles. I say pass on it unless you have a thing for bad flicks, and not bad in a good way.

Gore- 3/10
We get a bug coming out of someone's eye and an eye gouging.

Nudity- 0/10
The most we get is the lead in her bra.

Matt

countchocula
10-08-2002, 05:43 PM
Originally posted by Requiem-for-a-Dream
What bugs me the most was the lack of gore, Brian Yuzna has made all of his films with a great amount of gore but as soon as he produces a flick there's almost none to be found.

That's a valid complaint, but since I watched it on television, I accepted the fact beforehand that Arachnid would be a dry affair. Sci-fi could have been a little more lenient, though. Censorship is so fucking inconsistent, that we've actually gotten to the point where disembowelments (Dog Soldiers) are somehow less debauched then a bug popping out of a person's eye. What kind of logic is that?

Requiem-for-a-Dream
10-10-2002, 01:41 AM
lol, I hear you. Censorship is a fucking joke.

Matt

Gluttony
10-01-2003, 09:29 PM
MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS

A group of scientists, medical personal, ex-air force officers, and assorted others crash land on an island only to meet up with some not-so-nice spider mutations and such jungle terrors. Oh, and then there are lots of moments that lead toward aliens, a missing person, and… no that is pretty much it.

Although I can come out of the closet and say that I have arachnophobia, I really wonder why this didn’t give me the willies. There are quite a few moments that had the potential to make me squirm, but I quickly came to the realization that this flick was not made to frighten, but made to entertain. Arachnid fulfills this goal with relative ease; the movie brings in some amusing characters and throws them into an 80-minute romp through the jungle with lots of ugly mishaps along the way to make sure that any audience of nincompoops is still interested in this escapade. Of course, this movie is falling for most of the pratfalls along the way, dearth of originality, Arachnid uses less innovation with plot and characterization for a more swift approach with a few gory scenes of spider associated mayhem and cliché monster shenanigans. While this is all well and good, the predicament arises that none of the characters feel real or driven past the threadbare excuses of their own two-second explanation. But the lack of attention and nurturing given to all this “unimportant stuff” is paid off readily with some neat eye popping scenes and lots of mechanical effects (take that CGI!), which are beautifully crafted. If that is your type of flick, delving into idiocy, than Arachnid will probably be a good friend.

Arachnid is dumb as a post, but that is why you are supposed to like it damned it!

6/10

Jason13thh
10-02-2003, 10:43 AM
It was not a bad movie, not a masterpiece but enjoyable and entertaining enough for me.
It could have been more gory but not bad.
Some of the CGI were not too good,too.

countchocula
10-02-2003, 06:20 PM
Gluttony, does Arachnophobia give you the creepy-crawlies since it's grounded in reality, as opposed to Arachnid's fantastical elements? I have a fear of bees, but ironically enough, I can watch "killer bee" romps without recoiling in anxiety. Are you the same way?

Nice review, by the way.

Gluttony
10-06-2003, 01:05 PM
Thanks for the compliment, Count.

Yes, about anything to do with spiders makes me nervous and gives me a good case of the heeby geebies. Eight Legged Freaks made me uncomfortable, which sounds ridiculous but I am deathly scared of arachnids.

Spiders; on the other had, didn't seem to do the same, neither did its sequel. Not sure why that is but oh, well.

spacemonkey
10-06-2003, 01:32 PM
I remember renting this a while back...

I had high expectation what with Brian Yuzna attached and that cool looking poster, well I thought "this will be a fun monster flick!"

Hell no! I was wrong. This film was so unoriginal that I could literally predict everything that would happen. Its your typical monster movie. Only with really bad CGI effects, that make you feel like you are watching a bad tv movie.

The big spider at the end (wow big surprise there) looked so stiff and rigid that I just couldnt help but think of the pupeteers behind it trying to make that thing look real.

Sorry but I had to give this one a thumbs down all the way.

For a slightly superior creepy bugs film also produced by Brian Yuzna I suggest you check out Ticks. I had a better time with that one, it had cooler fx, and slightly more likable characters, also I oogled at Amy Dolenz for most of its duration. :D

countchocula
10-06-2003, 11:00 PM
Yeah, Ticks is a cut above the rest. I just wish it wasn't so damn hard to locate. I'm sorry that you didn't delight in Arachnid. It could have used a tongue-in-cheek vibe to ease the strain of some of its unabashed clichés.