areyoubeingserved
09-06-2002, 06:52 AM
Just checking to see what you guys thought, thats if you saw it. It screened on that awfully loud, self promotional, shit talker ENTERTAINMENT TONIGHT (I sat through a wad of Amerikan Idol bullshit to get to it).
It was quite thrilling, the ice palace and subsequential car chases look fucking stunning.
Two minor problems were with the plain awful innuendos...
JYNX
My friends call me Jynx.
JAMES BOND
Mine call me James Bond.
JYNX moves her eyes swiftly to BOND's crotch.
JYNX
That's quite a... mouthful.
And then there were some fairly naff looking fight scenes, in particular one with Bond seemingly fist fighting through lasers.
This outing for Bond boasts the most CGI (about 200x more than any previous film in the cannon), am I the only one just slightly unhappy with this? I think Bond has always been reliable through some form of gritiness, and although GOLDFINGER and the films thereon love their gloss, do we need computers to produce it?
Thoughts gentleman and the ladies, please?
It was quite thrilling, the ice palace and subsequential car chases look fucking stunning.
Two minor problems were with the plain awful innuendos...
JYNX
My friends call me Jynx.
JAMES BOND
Mine call me James Bond.
JYNX moves her eyes swiftly to BOND's crotch.
JYNX
That's quite a... mouthful.
And then there were some fairly naff looking fight scenes, in particular one with Bond seemingly fist fighting through lasers.
This outing for Bond boasts the most CGI (about 200x more than any previous film in the cannon), am I the only one just slightly unhappy with this? I think Bond has always been reliable through some form of gritiness, and although GOLDFINGER and the films thereon love their gloss, do we need computers to produce it?
Thoughts gentleman and the ladies, please?