PDA

View Full Version : The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari


countchocula
10-11-2002, 08:20 PM
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/6305075492.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

MINOR SPOILERS

Rating a film that was made in 1919 is an arduous challenge. I’ll never know how I honestly feel about The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari because I didn’t view it in the appropriate decade. For me to be affected by this film as the filmmaker intended, I would have to travel back in time to absorb that particular era. Unfortunately, all silent films suffer from being drastically outdated, but does that dampen their quality? Certainly not! I’m a big fan of Nosferatu. It proved to me that not being able to utilize sound wasn’t necessarily a handicap. In the early 20th century, filmmakers had to rely on engrossing visuals to captivate an audience. Robert Weine definitely achieved this with Caligari. The film has a well-defined style that separates it from all other cinematic ventures, past and present. For one, it’s tinted in dark blue, purple, and yellow. These saturated colors are simply gorgeous and accentuate the film’s moody inclinations. As another visual treat, the sets are highly unique. Everything is tilted, skewed, and off-kilter. I like how the abstract background mirrors the psychosis of our villain, but at times, I was paying more attention to the lavish scenery than I was to the characters and the storyline. I still haven’t decided if that’s a strong point or an impediment. I needed to devote as much of my attention as humanly possible to the characters and their dilemmas to decipher the intricate “mindfuck” of a storyline! Yes, “mindfuck.” Caligari constantly misleads you into believing one thing, and then turns itself upside down. You soon begin to question what is reality and what are the delusions of our storyteller. I still haven’t discerned every plot twist, but I’m sure it will sink in eventually.

When measuring Caligari up to Nosferatu, I’m hard pressed to choose one over the other. The latter is much simpler in scope, but it’s just as effective, as it tinkers with many emotions ranging from loneliness to unconditional love. To me, the former isn’t as emotional as it is technical and aesthetic. There are many social and political undercurrents throughout the film and they’re presented with finesse. At first, I didn’t pick up on them, but after browsing through various reviews online, everything made perfect sense. Something that Caligari and Nosferatu do have in common is their tendency to play with shadows. Of course, with Nosferatu, I’m referring to the haunting staircase silhouette (although there were many other instances of clever shadow play within the film). Caligari employs chilling shadows during Alan’s death sequence. Cesare enters the bedroom, targets his victim, and attacks. We witness their struggle by way of shadows on the wall. While the violence is strictly implied (obviously), the tension skyrockets during this scene. Impressive stuff, I must say. And while this film definitely doesn’t cater to everyone’s tastes, this is essential viewing for the genre film connoisseur. It holds your interest for a solid hour, and manipulates your brain with a daring, elaborate capoff. Rent/buy this gem as soon as possible because...you’ll die at dawn!

My rating-4.5/5

thebloodfeaster
02-03-2003, 06:13 PM
I got this on dvd for pretty cheap (one of those 6 dollar budget dvds), and I enjoyed the movie alot. However I was left pretty confused. I think because I have watched so few silent movies, I'm not used to the style and was a bit distracted from putting alot of deep thought into solving the mindfuck. It's been about a month since I watched it though, so I'll probably give it another spin within the next week. Overall, after the first viewing, I'd give it a 8/10... that may go up or down after I see it again.

Gluttony
02-03-2003, 06:56 PM
I have hard time reviewing silent movies, on the one side I find old movies charming and especially entertaining, they remind me of my own writing with the debunking of dialogue.

On the other hand, speech can make the character, and it becomes harder for me to actually like a characters when they do not speak at all. But I also have infinite respect for an actor who can make me like them without talking.

I am not the advocate of the silent ages but I do respect them.

Greg1066
04-17-2003, 06:07 PM
I *love* this movie! As a work of surreal horror, it has, in many ways, never been matched. And that ending! Suddenly, that senseless world all makes sense!

This one is screaming for a remake!

If only I could find a restored version.

Greg

teenkiller
11-06-2007, 10:52 AM
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/6305075492.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

MINOR SPOILERS

Rating a film that was made in 1919 is an arduous challenge. I’ll never know how I honestly feel about The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari because I didn’t view it in the appropriate decade. For me to be affected by this film as the filmmaker intended, I would have to travel back in time to absorb that particular era. Unfortunately, all silent films suffer from being drastically outdated, but does that dampen their quality? Certainly not!

I just watched the film for the first time last night and that was exactly what I was going to say. The film was good but it's not something I can easily rate because I feel it was of a certain time and place that I am too far removed from to be able to relate with.

I found a copy to watch on Youtube last night but unfortunately it was of very poor quality and at times it was difficult to make out what was happening on screen. Reading the Dr.'s notes near the end was impossible so I missed out on that. It wasn't so bad for the most part though. I was able to follow everything that was going on up until the ending, which I had to do some research on.

The set pieces are pretty cool. Hard to explain though. It's like they built sets and them had them slightly melted or something. A nice look for the film. I guess when you don't have a lot to SAY (persay) you have to really be inventive with how to grab people's attention and for a film released in 1920 this does quite well.

One question I have though. IMDB lists the running time at 71 minutes in other countries but 51 minutes in the US. Of course I saw the 51 minute version. Does anyone know why there is supposedly 20 minutes cut from the film?

Well thats all for now GOoD JOURNEY my fellow schmoes.

XpatrickX
11-06-2007, 10:56 AM
hat film flirts with being flawless, good review. The schmoes should start their own site compiling reviews for every horror movie, ever.

Cronos
11-06-2007, 12:22 PM
Awesome film, the visuals alone make it a must see. Wonderfully filmed and great sets.

8/10

Terror Australis
11-07-2007, 08:14 PM
I been meaning to check out The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari for while now but I have never been able to find it anywhere. Luckily I found it on GoogleVideo under its "public domain" section, I'll download it soon and tell you guys what I think.

countchocula
11-10-2007, 01:31 AM
Jesus, I can't believe that I wrote that review five years ago.