PDA

View Full Version : Is Halloween 5 that bad?


Jason
05-06-2002, 05:07 PM
After watching Halloween 5 on DVD I asked myself if it really deserved all of the negative reviews it had gotten. Sure it might not be the greatest one but it sure is better than 2,3 and 4. Halloween 5 is on par with the original actually. Halloween 1 will always be the best but is Halloween 5 far behind?

stevereno
05-06-2002, 05:34 PM
i disagree HALLOWEEN 4 is the best halloween. i do like part 5 but i hated it for killing rachel. there is already a halloween 5 room so this is probably going to get closed

just a warning

SHIVER ME TIMBERS

jtguy7908
05-06-2002, 09:22 PM
Hi stevereno,
Rachel was killed in "Halloween 5"? That sucks! She was one of the only reasons I watched part 4. How did she die? As you can tell, I haven't seen the whole series yet.

- jtguy7908

teenkiller
05-06-2002, 09:31 PM
I'm glad Rachel died. It throws you off guard from the very start. However her predecessor Tina was the most annoying character to ever grace a Halloween film. By the way Rachel died by SPOILER getting stabbed in the chest with a pair of scissors.
I like this movie. 8 out of 10. Well thats all for now GOoD JOURNEY my fellow schmoes.

stevereno
05-06-2002, 10:07 PM
well rachel sported a super 80's perm in part five so she got the "scissors" with in the first 15 minutes

i agree that it throws you off guard teenkiller, but i really liked rachel and she should of took the knife for jamie insted of tina

SHIVER ME TIMBERS

Hans, wihout Franz
05-06-2002, 10:09 PM
Weren't 4 and 5 both filmed at the same time? Anyway I thought 4 was better than 5. After seeing the cut version of 6 I though 5 was a masterpiece. So I guess it wasn't that bad. offical ratings: 4:**1/2,5:**, 6(the cut version):*

Elgyn
05-06-2002, 10:59 PM
Duplicate topic

P.S. - This is even worse than Part 6.

-----------------------------------------
And for the record, The Time sucked.

[This message has been edited by Elgyn (edited 05-06-2002).]

stevereno
05-06-2002, 11:24 PM
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Hans, wihout Franz:
Weren't 4 and 5 both filmed at the same time? Anyway I thought 4 was better than 5. After seeing the cut version of 6 I though 5 was a masterpiece. So I guess it wasn't that bad. offical ratings: 4:**1/2,5:**, 6(the cut version):*</font>

no.part 4 was filmed in march of 1988 and part 5 was filmed in may of 1989

SHIVER ME TIMBERS

ominous_oat
05-06-2002, 11:27 PM
elgyn's right, thanks for the help.