PDA

View Full Version : Winona Ryder, Kirsten Dunst, Chloe Sevigny all want to blow Vinnie Gallo!


Kleopatra
05-21-2003, 07:21 PM
NOT! funny title though huh. seriously is this guy misunderstood genius or a nutjob


American actor-director Vincent Gallo on Wednesday defended his graphic depiction of oral sex in road movie "The Brown Bunny" that has provoked a scandal at the Cannes Film Festival.

He also revealed he had rejected Hollywood stars Winona Ryder and Kirsten Dunst for supporting roles.

Gallo, sitting with co-star Chloe Sevigny at a packed news conference, said of their sex scene together that leaves nothing to the imagination: "We were very private in the room. We had the camera on remote."

Gallo, who plays the part of a motorbike rider who can never get over the love of his life, said the scene was artistically acceptable.

"When I had the idea in the script, I couldn't imagine it any other way," he said. "I was not driven by concepts of eroticism, pornography or scandal."

He told journalists: "Thank you for wondering if it was real or not. You must have been impressed."

Sevigny admitted "It was the most personal film I have ever made -- very intense."

Renowned for his blunt approach to Hollywood, the maverick director revealed that he canned the chance to cast Dunst or Ryder and opted for a total unknown in a supporting role.

"It didn't work out with Kirsten because she had an...agent who harassed me," said Gallo, who achieved cult status with his directorial debut "Buffalo '66" with Christina Ricci.

Gallo said "I just happened to get a Winona call just after the Kirsten debacle. I thought she is in the paper (over shoplifting charges), I know she's done it. This will be good."

Ryder was fined and ordered to serve three years' probation last December for shoplifting thousands of dollars worth of designer goods from Saks Fifth Avenue branch in Beverly Hills.

Gallo said neither actress was up for Sevigny's part. "I was never going to put Winona Ryder in a significant role," he said.

He invited Ryder to fly up to New Hampshire where he was filming. It was a disaster. "She ballbusted me about the make-up and about the wardrobe," he said.

So Gallo instead picked a total unknown in the main street of the tiny town where they were filming.

He told his crew: "We are going into town and the first girl over 12 and under 100 is going to be the girl in the movie."

Critics were sharply divided over the film, openly laughing at some of the endlessly drawn out scenes. Gallo was even booed by some when he arrived at the press conference.

Clearly happy to have stirred controversy, he told reporters: "I have accepted unpopularity since I was very young. It is part of my comfort zone."

Giselle
05-22-2003, 12:29 AM
There is just something about him I don't like its like his image he is putting forth is completely contrived. He seems to be the one putting the "I'm an insane anti-hollywood director" notion into everyones heads for them. . .

FeverDog420
05-22-2003, 04:04 AM
Yeah, Vincent Gallo comes off as an arrogant prick, but I gotta admit that Buffalo 66 was a terrific film.

FeverDog420
05-22-2003, 05:09 PM
Gallo's 'Bunny' hops to the top of 'all-time worst' list
by Roger Ebert

Coming up for air like an exhausted swimmer, the Cannes Film Festival produced two splendid films on Wednesday morning, after a week of the most dismal entries in memory. Denys Arcand's "The Barbarian Invasion," from Quebec, and Errol Morris' documentary "The Fog of War," about Robert McNamara, are in their different ways both masterpieces about old men who find a kind of wisdom.

But that is not the headline. The news is that on Tuesday night, Cannes showed a film so shockingly bad that it created a scandal here on the Riviera not because of sex, violence or politics, but simply because of its awfulness.

Those who saw Vincent Gallo's "The Brown Bunny" have been gathering ever since, with hushed voices and sad smiles, to discuss how wretched it was. Those who missed it hope to get tickets, for no other film has inspired such discussion. "The worst film in the history of the festival," I told a TV crew posted outside the theater. I have not seen every film in the history of the festival, yet I feel my judgment will stand.

Imagine 90 tedious minutes of a man driving across America in a van. Imagine long shots through a windshield as it collects bug splats. Imagine not one but two scenes in which he stops for gas. Imagine a long shot on the Bonneville Salt Flats where he races his motorcycle until it disappears as a speck in the distance, followed by another shot in which a speck in the distance becomes his motorcycle. Imagine a film so unendurably boring that at one point, when he gets out of his van to change his shirt, there is applause.

And then, after half the audience has walked out and those who remain stay because they will never again see a film so amateurish, narcissistic, self-indulgent and bloody-minded, imagine a scene where the hero's lost girl reappears, performs fellatio in a hard-core scene and then reveals the sad truth of their relationship.

Of Vincent Gallo, the film's star, writer, producer, director, editor and only begetter, it can be said that this talented actor must have been out of his mind to (a) make this film and (b) allow it to be seen. Of Chloe Sevigny, who plays the girlfriend, Daisy, it must be said that she brings a truth and vulnerability to her scene that exists on a level far above the movie it is in.

If Gallo had thrown away all of the rest of the movie and made the Sevigny scene into a short film, he would have had something. That this film was admitted into Cannes as an Official Selection is inexplicable. By no standard, through no lens, in any interpretation, does it qualify for Cannes. The quip is: This is the most anti-American film at Cannes, because it is so anti-American to show it as an example of American filmmaking.

Slim
05-22-2003, 07:52 PM
I want to see this movie just because Ebert had the balls to say it's the worst film in festival history. And that his judgement will stand. Pfft. I hate that guy.

JCR
05-23-2003, 09:40 AM
Reading some of the reviews this films been getting on imdb.com, I don't think it's chances of getting wide distribution are very good.

Although, this is a good thing if the film is as boring as that guy sez. I love bad flims, but I cannot stand boring ones.