PDA

View Full Version : My "HITCHER II: I've Been Waiting" Review


TheHitcher2
07-09-2003, 07:47 PM
*This review contains minor spoilers.

Oh, where to begin?

If you're a fan of the original film, you're bound to be disappointed by this straight to video effort.

The plot goes something like this: Jim Halsey is now a police officer who lives with his crop-dusting girlfriend Maggie (Kari Wuhrer) in rural Iowa. After Jim is discharged from the force for getting a little trigger happy, he and Maggie decide to take a trip down to Texas to visit Captain Esteridge (from the first film). Along the way, they pick up a hitchhiker (played by Jake Busey) and all hell breaks loose.

The first problem with this film is that Rutger Hauer is missing and Jake Busey has been cast to fill his shoes. Where Hauer was menacing, Busey is just plain goofy. Where Hauer was the ultimate threat to Jim in the original, Busey is just there to be his stupid self (what the hell was up with the cook's outfit and the EMERIL reference? I'm serious, EMERIL!). Without the threat of an evil 'hitcher', the film really has nothing to rely on.

Another issue is the complete lack of logic (someone who got shot in the leg CANNOT run around all day). The opening five minutes of the film are so utterly ridiculous that it's hard to believe they were even included...could have done without that and started after the fact.

I liked that the writers made references to the first film, bringing back Capt. Esteridge (now played by Stephen Hair, a different actor). You'll notice a few things scattered throughout that pay some sort of homage to the original. The last thirty-five minutes are basically copied from the first flick as well. You'll see what I'm talking about. There's a bit of role reversal, but seriously...

Overall, this film is really lacking.

Jim Halsey is no longer a likeable character, he now comes off like a broken psychopath and Howell overplays him a bit in my opinion.

Kari Wuhrer, aside from a few instances of bad line delivery (and when she attempts a Midwestern accent...what the fuck?), is pretty good as the female heroine. I'll eat my words because I thought she'd be so hands down awful. While not perfect, she came out as the best of the bunch.

The other characters are totally incidental and the performances are of low to passing quality. Just wait until you hear the "latino" police chief Castillo pronounce his last name (Cast-Illo). Real nice, bud. Get back to your fucking acting coach!

As I said before, Jake Busey really sucks in comparison to Rutger Hauer...but what could I expect?

Louis Morneau does try to capture a bit of the original's feel (the desert is present and he does cool timelapse shots), but it's just not the same. Morneau has a ton of really choppy and cheesy edits ("Bats" all over again), whereas the first film had smooth, roaming shots of the open road and sky.

Despite the film's faults, I will admit that I enjoyed the finale and the closing shots.

I know I shouldn't have expected much, but this film comes really close to tarnishing my memory of the original. I'll be curious to see what you all think, but for now, I'm off to pop the first "Hitcher" in my DVD player to remember how wonderful it really is.

vtadave
07-09-2003, 08:22 PM
Kari Wuhrer tit shots? Inquiring minds want to know.

TheHitcher2
07-09-2003, 08:39 PM
No nudity...not much clevage either!

Requiem-for-a-Dream
07-10-2003, 02:22 AM
Originally posted by TheHitcher2
No nudity...not much clevage either!

How about gore?

Thanks!
Matt

WamphyriNate
07-10-2003, 02:36 AM
Well, I was looking forward to seeing this, but..... Damn, is it really THAT bad? And no Wuhrer boobs to even try and save it?

TheHitcher2
07-10-2003, 04:12 AM
Hmmm...gore factor. There's really not much of it, some standard gun shots...except for one part where someone's body literally explodes.

There's also a chopped off finger, but you don't really see it and I'd say it's pretty damn fake looking.

I really can't say much else, I think you guys should see it for yourself, but personally...it was really, really, really bad. It seems like they completely missed the point of the original.

I realized I forgot to mention two annoying points:

-The music: Mark Isham's score for the original was really subtle and beautiful...it really melded well with the film. Joe Kraemer's score is like something for a made-for-tv movie and I kept noticing this damn "metal scraping" whine that I also heard in freaking Halloween: Resurrection. You'll know exactly what I'm talking about when you hear it.

The second point contains some SPOILERS...do not read unless you want to know a slight SPOILER. Last warning on the SPOIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR issue.


Jake Busey's hitcher has a really, really poor motive. There's some hint that he's trying to strengthen the duo (Jim and Maggie) but later on he says, "Ever get bored just watching TV?" which is just frigging retarded!


That's all I gotta say for now, but I'll answer any questions you guys have.

Requiem-for-a-Dream
07-10-2003, 04:20 AM
Thanks for the reply, I'll check it out but I won't expect excellence.

Matt

XCoRyX
07-10-2003, 04:20 AM
i figured many would be disappointed with this flick...still worth a look if you ask me...

rtatick
07-10-2003, 12:25 PM
So, TheHitcher2, do you regret choosing that name now?!?!?

LOL... I'm just jerking your chain... Don't take me seriously... Anyways, I'll check this out, probably won't blindly buy it like I was planning to.

TheHitcher2
07-10-2003, 03:16 PM
Definitely rent first!

Mike
07-16-2003, 01:33 AM
You can read my review here: http://www.joblo.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=57905

rtatick
07-18-2003, 08:57 AM
Saw this movie last night....

Terrible.

An insult to the first film.

The acting was OK, but the script was one of the worst. The actors had nothing real to say, nothing to go with. The flow of action was almost exactly the same as the first just... not suspenseful. The director here shows he can handle a scene in terms of artistic setup, but there is zero atmosphere throughout. A few times I was worried that it was going to turn into a violent gore flick which would have made it even worse. And the "finale"... Oh my GOD, how utterly ridiculus and UNexciting.

My biggest fear is that people are going to see this and not even given the first one a chance. It WILL tarnish the good name of the first.

The one good thing about all of this: This will give a perfect example of how NOT to make a sequel.

Munson
07-18-2003, 09:29 AM
I watched this Wednesday night and I agree it's bad. Movies like this are a big reason why I joined Netflix.

Dirtmunky
07-19-2003, 08:55 AM
I dont get why the guy would pick up another hitchhiker after last time, i know i wouldnt.

sarah1980
07-19-2003, 03:18 PM
Well since Rutger Hauer ain't in it,what's the point in seeing it???

Gluttony
07-20-2003, 01:02 PM
Hitcher 2: I've been waiting- 6/10

Decent time is good if you liked the first or just need something embarrassing to watch. still kind of fun despite the lame finale with tthe semi and plane, but the photography is well handled by veteran hack Morneau. Busey is different from the original Hitcher and more of a wise ass but his characters is better than attempting to mimic the first completely. If anything, I think that the Hitcher and its sequel draws alot of its atmosphere from not knowing the true motive behind the slaughter. I still found this effective here.