PDA

View Full Version : Children Of The Corn 666


sleepawaycampfan#1
07-26-2003, 01:47 PM
Gosh, this was the worst film I have ever seen! I mean, they should have connected it a little more to the original, but this turned out to be one big mess. I believe this Is the worst of them all followed by Children of The Corn: Revelation. When I got this movie I thought it would be good since Isaac was back, but sadly I was disappointed. How many of you were disappointed by this movie or actually thought it was good???

" Are you queer or something?"
( Judy, Sleepaway Camp)

W. E. Sawyer
07-26-2003, 02:51 PM
The last couple Children of the Corn sequels have been pretty bad. I am still a fan of the original and the first few sequels - those were good.

Elgyn
07-26-2003, 11:44 PM
Worst. Series. EVER.

The Claw
07-27-2003, 12:00 AM
Originally posted by Elgyn
Worst. Series. EVER.

I agree with this fine gentleman. The third is the only half entertaining movie in the whole series. The rest (except maybe part 1) make my worst ever list.

JayWolf
07-27-2003, 03:56 AM
I don't know. I always had a soft spot for COTC IV: The Gathering.

Hero
07-27-2003, 04:22 AM
Man I want my $10 bucks back for the first one!!:mad: I should've followed Arrow's review! Except for the music and Linda Hamilton, everything else sucked! How are you suppose to be afarid of some snot-nosed freckled face brat who talks like a redneck? Absolutely no way.

I don't see this one being any better. I swear, I will NEVER watch another Children of the Corn!

Boogeyman
07-27-2003, 11:50 AM
Children of the Corn: Revelations came on one night and I though, what the hell. I cant says that I'm an avid fan of the series so I didnt quite know what to expect. But I watched it, and it really didnt make much sense. I was just sitting there thinking...why, why, why. So now, if I ever watch another one...I wont ask any questions.

later

Mr Bones
07-27-2003, 01:41 PM
I stopped watching the Children of the Corn series after the first one. Cause it just made the book a mockery of itself. So I never saw a reason to make a sequel in the first place, let alone 6!

Requiem-for-a-Dream
07-27-2003, 02:19 PM
The series didn't exactly start on a positive note but it did begin to get better as the series went on (except for the awful part 2).

1- 6/10

2- 4/10

3- 7/10

4- 8/10

5- 7/10

666- 8/10

7- 7/10

They're harmless and have enough blood and gore to go around.

Matt

slasherfan
07-27-2003, 05:01 PM
I'm somewhat fan of the series.
1- 5/10
2- 6/10
3- 7/10
4- 6/10
5- 7/10
6- 2/10
7- 6/10

I hated the 6th entry with a passion, it was dull and nothing happened in it had a cool head split but that's about it, I'm going to tastfully say what I think of it.
http://smilies.crowd9.com/cwm/cwm/piss2.gifhttp://www.thevideograveyard.com/boxes/childrencorn666.gifhttp://smilies.crowd9.com/cwm/cwm/piss.gif

p1phillips
07-27-2003, 10:54 PM
I actually think part 1 is one of the weaker entries! It has not aged well. The worst is definitely part 6. I agree with those who say it is boring and stupid. Otherwise I'm in that minority who thinks that this isn't a bad DTV franchise. Most of the time, they offer some decent gore and cheap thrills. I think the best one is part 5. Still waiting for part 7 to hit video stores over here.

Requiem-for-a-Dream
07-28-2003, 02:04 AM
Originally posted by p1phillips
I actually think part 1 is one of the weaker entries! It has not aged well. The worst is definitely part 6. I agree with those who say it is boring and stupid. Otherwise I'm in that minority who thinks that this isn't a bad DTV franchise. Most of the time, they offer some decent gore and cheap thrills. I think the best one is part 5. Still waiting for part 7 to hit video stores over here.

If you hate 6, you'll probably loath part 7.

Matt