Pamela Anderson urges KFC boycott

[edonline]

As serious as she may be about the issue, can anyone really take Pamela Anderson seriously?
------------------------

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=389271&section=news

Pamela Anderson urges KFC boycott
Fri 17 October, 2003 04:13 BST

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Actress Pamela Anderson has joined an animal rights campaign against fast-food chain KFC, urging a consumer boycott of the franchise until it ensures better treatment of its chickens.

"If people knew how KFC treats chickens, they'd never eat another drumstick," the Canadian-born former "Baywatch" beauty wrote in an open letter circulated by the group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) on Thursday.

The letter was addressed to John Bitove, chairman of the Toronto-based company Priszm Brandz, which owns the Canadian franchise to KFC, a division of Yum Brands

"What KFC does to 750 million chickens each year is not civilised or acceptable," she wrote. "I am calling for a boycott of all KFC restaurants until my friends at PETA tell me that you have agreed to be kinder in your practices."

A Priszm Brandz spokeswoman, Alessandra Saccal, dismissed claims that the chickens sold in its KFC outlets are mistreated.

"We purchase our chickens from the same place that grocery stores and other restaurants purchase their chickens from, and the chicken farmers of Canada are very responsible and take the welfare of animals very seriously," she said.

In July, PETA filed suit against KFC, accusing the company of making misleading statements on its Web site regarding how the chickens it sells are treated. PETA contends that the chickens KFC buys from suppliers are abused through drugging, feeding and slaughter practices.

Anderson is not the first celebrity to join PETA's cause against Louisville, Kentucky-based KFC. Former Beatle Paul McCartney appealed to the fast-food chain in July to ensure better treatment of its chickens in a PETA ad.

[Lynn Minmei]

In other news, KFC urges a boycott of Pamela Anderson.

[BakeTheMooCow]

Why does she even bother? Ever since she's become a mom, she's been acting like Madonna, and trying to portray herself as some down-to-earth intelligent woman.

I'm all for the ethical treatment of animals and all that shit.. but I don't need to hear it from her.

Fucking slut.

[Sugar Magnolia]

I don't really see the point of treating chickens better if they're gonna be killed. That's kinda like a man on death row asking for some fluffier pillows...

[vtadave]

Stupid cunt. I was wondering what I should get for dinner tonight. 3 piece dinner with potatoes and gravy and macaroni sounds good.

[ofmknockoff]

And is related news: Pamela Anderson gets behind a cause that she doesn't care about to get herself back in the spotlight. This recent loss in popularity may be because Anderson has become famous despite having absolutely no talents. More on the story as it develops.

[Reigh Kaufman]

Better treatment of its chickens? What are they gonna do, tickle them to death? Kill them with an over-zealous show of affection? She needs to prioritise or be quiet or have the courage of her convictions (if she isn't already a veggie). It's like these morons who say, 'oh, yeah, no, what they do with lobsters is the put them in tepid water so it goes to sleep, then they boil it to death so they don't feel any pain'. Aye, okay. Pam should go the whole fucking hog (with apple sauce) or shut the fuck up...

[BorderEevilIII]

It sooo weird that Jason Alexander was saying the same thing few months back and KFC fired back and said, "Thats it!" No commercial contract for yoooou! But still the ads still ran anyway. As for Pam she should have a biscuit and stuff it down her pie hole. :D

[Jim H]

Originally posted by Sugar Magnolia
I don't really see the point of treating chickens better if they're gonna be killed. That's kinda like a man on death row asking for some fluffier pillows...

A better analogy would be a guard being kind to a man on deathrow who he knows is innocent.

[bankholdup]

I'll allow it...






...oh, like you don't think she's hot.

[Scarface98.9]

I never did understand why people would want a lot better treatment for animals like chickens, knowing full well the chickens will die. The same thing happened with Jason Alexander a few months ago, and I'm still baffled

[Invincible]

Originally posted by Lynn Minmei
In other news, KFC urges a boycott of Pamela Anderson.

LOL, exactly haha :D

[Sugar Magnolia]

Originally posted by Jim H
A better analogy would be a guard being kind to a man on deathrow who he knows is innocent.

Yeah, but chicken is delicious. Mmmmmmmm...

[Jim H]

Originally posted by Sugar Magnolia
Yeah, but chicken is delicious. Mmmmmmmm...

No denying that.. Had a BBQ chicken sub today. Deeeelicious.

[Jim H]

Originally posted by Scarface98.9
I never did understand why people would want a lot better treatment for animals like chickens, knowing full well the chickens will die. The same thing happened with Jason Alexander a few months ago, and I'm still baffled

I don't understand that attitude either. In other words, if someone or something is going to die, there is no value in comforting them? With that attitude, you might as well never be nice to anything - we all die eventually.

[Lynn Minmei]

Originally posted by Jim H
No denying that.. Had a BBQ chicken sub today. Deeeelicious.

I had a Buffalo chicken sub today, so HA!

[SykkBoy]

I'm eating KFC leftovers right now actually.....

mmmmmmmmmmmmm, drumsticks...

[Jim H]

Originally posted by Lynn Minmei
I had a Buffalo chicken sub today, so HA!

Damn, I just got

http://www.rit.edu/~bxw3064/ali-owned.jpg

[Tuukka]

"Fucking slut"

"Stupid cunt"

RE:

I don't find it problematic if someone wants people to treat animals with respect, even if they are used for food. Like Jim said, why not treat animals nicely before we kill and eat them.

I don't mind eating meat myself, but I think that animals should be treated respectfully when they are alive. I think the way how we treat animals shows us for what we really are as a society. If we treat them cruelly and without respect, we degrade ourselves as well.

[Tuukka]

Originally posted by Jim H
I don't understand that attitude either. In other words, if someone or something is going to die, there is no value in comforting them? With that attitude, you might as well never be nice to anything - we all die eventually.

RE: Exactly.

[James Logan]

To a certain extent, I agree with Jim and Tuukk'. I'll keep going to KFC, but I do agree. :) I just guess there's more important causes to fight for than chicken...

[Tuukka]

Originally posted by James Logan
To a certain extent, I agree with Jim and Tuukk'. I'll keep going to KFC, but I do agree. :) I just guess there's more important causes to fight for than chicken...

RE: I wouldn't mind goig to KFC myself, I don't put effort into protecting the rights of the animals. But I tend to appreciate people who do.

I've never bought the "There are more important causes to fight" argument. For example we spend quite a lot of our time fighting about movies on these boards, that hardly qualifies as a more important cause.

People WASTE most of their free time to useless things anyway, so if someone instead DOES something good to the world, I don't care if he is helping animals, orphans or AIDS victims.

Personally, I'm too busy writing posts on movie discussion boards to help anyone except myself...

[James Logan]

Originally posted by Tuukka
RE: I wouldn't mind goig to KFC myself, I don't put effort into protecting the rights of the animals. But I tend to appreciate people who do.


Fair enough. I didn't need that to appreciate Pamela, though...the ta-ta's were enough. ;)

Originally posted by Tuukka

I've never bought the "There are more important causes to fight" argument. For example we spend quite a lot of our time fighting about movies on these boards, that hardly qualifies as a more important cause.


I think movies and all kinds of artistic expression are very important causes to defend. But that's a whole off-topic other conversation...so let's not get started on it. ;)

Originally posted by Tuukka

People WASTE most of their free time to useless things anyway, so if someone instead DOES something good to the world, I don't care if he is helping animals, orphans or AIDS victims.


Ditto again. But, I'll be honest...some posts in here made me laugh. I love heartless jokes. :p

[edonline]

One of the things I'm surprised no one's mentioned yet is that Pammy has been out of the spotlight for a while after her break-up with Kid Rock (are they still broken up? back together? does anyone know? does anyone care?) but then all of a sudden she pops up as a spokesperson for PETA. I don't recall ever speaking up for animal rights before but if she did it, it had to have been pretty low-key as opposed to some other activists (Alicia Silverston for example, who has been an active and vocal member of PETA). Keeping her name in the news? It wouldn't be the first time a celebrity has done something like this. Another thing that strikes me as being weird is why doesn't she devote her time to other causes that are close to her, say Hepatitis prevention and treatment.

[Nate6]

She's been a PETA supporter for quite a while, I think. I'm fairly sure I remember her being interviewed back in the mid-90s on Entertainment Tonight about such issues.

But I agree, seems like talking about how to prevent Hepatitis C, the disease she has (or has she finished her treatment?), is a more imminently important thing for her to be speaking out on. That's her choice, though, I guess.

[edonline]

Originally posted by Nate6
She's been a PETA supporter for quite a while, I think. I'm fairly sure I remember her being interviewed back in the mid-90s on Entertainment Tonight about such issues.

But I agree, seems like talking about how to prevent Hepatitis C, the disease she has (or has she finished her treatment?), is a more imminently important thing for her to be speaking out on. That's her choice, though, I guess.

I wonder if PETA went right to Pamela right after their last celebrity. The Jason Alexander protest was a shambles after he was dumped by KFC (brilliant move Jason, talk about biting the hand that feed you!) because I think the group was trying to use him as an "insider". But let's face it, Jason Alexander will always be known as George Costanza and he's not as big as a pop cultural icon as Pamela Anderson who can be "marketed" more accessibly.

[dh1989]

I must say, despite my old dislike of Pamela Anderson, I must respct her for doing this. As a fellow supporter of animal rights and vegetarian, it's nice to see her speaking up against the disgusting fast-food "restraunts" in this world. Not only do they contribute to the obesity problem in our youth, but their killing methods of animals are plain depsicable.

[ZoMBiEPeEpSHoW]

Just out of curiosity... What exactly is the "correct" way to kill an animal for the purpose of nourrishment?

[RickySlade]

Who the hell really cares? I mean, how are you supposed to kill it? Plus, if you are a meat eater why does anyone care how it is killed just as long as it tastes good.

[Jerk Shapiro]

Is it wrong that I've got KFC on the way as we speak?

[piglet5]

Originally posted by Tuukka
"Fucking slut"

"Stupid cunt"

RE:

I don't find it problematic if someone wants people to treat animals with respect, even if they are used for food. Like Jim said, why not treat animals nicely before we kill and eat them.

I don't mind eating meat myself, but I think that animals should be treated respectfully when they are alive. I think the way how we treat animals shows us for what we really are as a society. If we treat them cruelly and without respect, we degrade ourselves as well.

right on :)

[SykkBoy]

My biggest problems with most animal rights activists is they only want to save the cute animals....

I grew up on a farm in rural Wyoming and we were innundated by well meaning but totally wrong animal rights activists with regards to transporting and treatment of livestock.

I remember during an antelope overpopulation crisis (these animals were starving to death as they continued to brred until they ran out of food (mother nature is a cruel bitch, much moreso than a redneck with a gun)) and we had all of these animal rights people protesting the hunters and the fact the Game and Fish department was doling out more licenses than usual. I guess these people thought it was more humane to let these animals starve to death than to be used for food....

What was REALLY funny were these same people thinking they'd take buckets of grain to the starving antelope...seems the antelope weren;t concerned with people's rights...most of them got trampled...

I have to REALLY laugh my ass off at the animal people trying to convince Sigfried and Roy to get rid of their animals....not realizing those animals live better than 95% of the humans I know...

While I'm not an advocate of abusing animals, when an animal is classified as food, where do we draw the line on how they are killed for that food?

While I respect Pammy's right to her opinion and would never call her a slut or a cunt just because she's an idiot, I just think she's somewhat misguided.

[Tuukka]

Originally posted by ZoMBiEPeEpSHoW
Just out of curiosity... What exactly is the "correct" way to kill an animal for the purpose of nourrishment?

RE:

For example blowing the brains out is a good way. The key issue is to give the animal a decent life before it's killed. The way of killing is not important, as long as it is fast and relatively painless. Like blowing the brains out. Or electrocuting it. Whatever.

[Tuukka]

Originally posted by RickySlade
Who the hell really cares? I mean, how are you supposed to kill it? Plus, if you are a meat eater why does anyone care how it is killed just as long as it tastes good.

RE: Quite a lot of people seem to care, since the issue is raised every once in a while.

[Tuukka]

Originally posted by SykkBoy
My biggest problems with most animal rights activists is they only want to save the cute animals....

I grew up on a farm in rural Wyoming and we were innundated by well meaning but totally wrong animal rights activists with regards to transporting and treatment of livestock.

I remember during an antelope overpopulation crisis (these animals were starving to death as they continued to brred until they ran out of food (mother nature is a cruel bitch, much moreso than a redneck with a gun)) and we had all of these animal rights people protesting the hunters and the fact the Game and Fish department was doling out more licenses than usual. I guess these people thought it was more humane to let these animals starve to death than to be used for food....

What was REALLY funny were these same people thinking they'd take buckets of grain to the starving antelope...seems the antelope weren;t concerned with people's rights...most of them got trampled...

I have to REALLY laugh my ass off at the animal people trying to convince Sigfried and Roy to get rid of their animals....not realizing those animals live better than 95% of the humans I know...

RE: I definitely agree that sometimes animal activists are not thinking logically and occasionally they even end up causing harm to animals because of their ignorance. Most activists seem to be smart and knowledgeable folk, thought.

"While I'm not an advocate of abusing animals, when an animal is classified as food, where do we draw the line on how they are killed for that food?"

RE: I don't think that the issue is only how we kill them, but also how we let them live before we kill them. The point is to avoid unnecessary suffering.

[Jim H]

Originally posted by RickySlade
Who the hell really cares? I mean, how are you supposed to kill it? Plus, if you are a meat eater why does anyone care how it is killed just as long as it tastes good.

Your post reminded me of my diabolical plot to genetically engineer a new super predator to thin down the human population. We sure need it.

[James Logan]

Originally posted by ZoMBiEPeEpSHoW
Just out of curiosity... What exactly is the "correct" way to kill an animal for the purpose of nourrishment?

What Tuukk' said. I don't know how KFC people kill their chicken (maybe someone mentioned it, didn't catch it), but you gotta make it painless. For instance, the traditional way you kill a chicken is to chop its head off while it's alive. Now that may sound painless, but I've done it several times before (family lives in Egypt, and when we're there me and my cousins do the cookin', and my grandma insists we do it the old-fashioned way), and the trick is, once you cut the head off the chick, you gotta old it firm and turn it around in a bucket for the blood to get out of its neck, cause the bastard is still alive. And it'll stay alive for...let's say thirty, fourty painful seconds.

Now imagine someone doing that to you. :) If you consider chickens as living beings, then you'll understand that the correct way to kill 'em is to do it so there's very little pain involved for them.

[Tuukka]

Originally posted by James Logan
What Tuukk' said. I don't know how KFC people kill their chicken (maybe someone mentioned it, didn't catch it), but you gotta make it painless. For instance, the traditional way you kill a chicken is to chop its head off while it's alive. Now that may sound painless, but I've done it several times before (family lives in Egypt, and when we're there me and my cousins do the cookin', and my grandma insists we do it the old-fashioned way), and the trick is, once you cut the head off the chick, you gotta old it firm and turn it around in a bucket for the blood to get out of its neck, cause the bastard is still alive. And it'll stay alive for...let's say thirty, fourty painful seconds.

Now imagine someone doing that to you. :) If you consider chickens as living beings, then you'll understand that the correct way to kill 'em is to do it so there's very little pain involved for them.

RE: Is it really "alive"? I mean if the head is off I would imagine the chicken's brains can't register pain anymore. It sounds more like after death muscular movements to me... Humans also have those, even if brain activity is dead.

[ZoMBiEPeEpSHoW]

Originally posted by James Logan
Now imagine someone doing that to you. :) If you consider chickens as living beings, then you'll understand that the correct way to kill 'em is to do it so there's very little pain involved for them.

Well, if anyone here is actually interested, the place where KFC purchases their chicken (the same place most grocery stores purchase their chickens) kills their chickens by electrocution, quick and painless. And as for their lives privy to their death, the chickens are really well treated. Of course they are all bundled together and rumage around in their own feces, but so are they in a poultry farm inside of a chicken coop. The pens are cleaned out daily and they are fed more then enough. An average chicken ages in almost 2 months, depending on the time of year and the type of chicken. So truly, the chickens are not treated anymore badly at KFC slaughterhouses than they are on a poultry farm. PETA is just largely misinformed on the subject.

Let's face it, the chicken you eat at home is probably was probably purchased at the same place KFC purchases theirs. Here in Canada, the chicken is provided by Flamingo (Olymel). KFC does not kill their own chickens, the purchase them through contract with major poultry distributors.

[Lynn7]

Whenever I listen to an interview with a member of PETA, I am always dissappointed when the interviewer never asks if these people are Pro-life or Pro-choice for humans. I'd love to know how they think on this issue.

It's hard to take Anderson seriously-not that she doesn't have the right to her opinion, but I need to respect a person before I take their viewpoint to heart and I can't respect her on anything. Well---- she does seem like she loves her kids but that's about it.

[Jim H]

Originally posted by ZoMBiEPeEpSHoW
Well, if anyone here is actually interested, the place where KFC purchases their chicken (the same place most grocery stores purchase their chickens) kills their chickens by electrocution, quick and painless. And as for their lives privy to their death, the chickens are really well treated. Of course they are all bundled together and rumage around in their own feces, but so are they in a poultry farm inside of a chicken coop. The pens are cleaned out daily and they are fed more then enough. An average chicken ages in almost 2 months, depending on the time of year and the type of chicken. So truly, the chickens are not treated anymore badly at KFC slaughterhouses than they are on a poultry farm. PETA is just largely misinformed on the subject.

Let's face it, the chicken you eat at home is probably was probably purchased at the same place KFC purchases theirs. Here in Canada, the chicken is provided by Flamingo (Olymel). KFC does not kill their own chickens, the purchase them through contract with major poultry distributors.

I am of the opinion that chickens raised in what are usually termed factory farms are badly treated. Their feet become deformed to the point where they can't walk because they are so cramped, as one example. Some factory farms aren't as bad as others though. We used to buy amish chicken when possible, or free range barring that, but as near as I can tell, they don't sell it here in Missouri. It was slightly more expensive, but I'd much rather support more local farmers and the amish, not to mention the better treatment of animals.

BTW, when you completely sever a chicken's head it is effectively dead. It's just nerves twitching, people will sometimes do the same thing when they're dead. To link back to movies, The Rock showcases this effect when the monitor lands on that one guys head. They're not like some insects, who actually have different parts of their brain in different parts of the body.

My great-grandmother killed chickens by completely severing the jugular - she'd stick the knife into the neck behind it, then slice all the way out. Drained the blood extremely quickly, and for some reason she thought it was better. I doubt it was instantaneous, but they apparently were totally limp in less then 5 seconds.

[Twisted Sister]

Originally posted by Tuukka
"Fucking slut"

"Stupid cunt"

RE:

I don't find it problematic if someone wants people to treat animals with respect, even if they are used for food. Like Jim said, why not treat animals nicely before we kill and eat them.

I don't mind eating meat myself, but I think that animals should be treated respectfully when they are alive. I think the way how we treat animals shows us for what we really are as a society. If we treat them cruelly and without respect, we degrade ourselves as well.
'
Wow - very nicely said, T. It's actually a very common belief among many native american tribes (respecting animals, esp. if you intend on killing them for your own survival).

I love BBQ'd animals as much as the next red-blooded American guy/gal, but I'd probably not feel like eating if I saw how the animals were butchered before they were so nicely shrink-wrapped. I'm all for ethical treatment.

[Grebdron]

Originally posted by Jim H
We used to buy amish chicken when possible,

What are Amish chickens? Do they have long grey beards, and walk everywhere instead of driving?;)

MY chicken doesn't come from a butcher's factory. MY chicken is born boneless and skinless, and comes shrinkwrapped.

[James Logan]

Originally posted by Tuukka
RE: Is it really "alive"? I mean if the head is off I would imagine the chicken's brains can't register pain anymore. It sounds more like after death muscular movements to me... Humans also have those, even if brain activity is dead.

That's it. I don't know technically if it's still considered "alive", but hey...in my book, if it's still movin', it ain't dead, and if it ain't dead, it's alive. ;)

[Jim H]

Originally posted by Twisted Sister
'
Wow - very nicely said, T. It's actually a very common belief among many native american tribes (respecting animals, esp. if you intend on killing them for your own survival).

I love BBQ'd animals as much as the next red-blooded American guy/gal, but I'd probably not feel like eating if I saw how the animals were butchered before they were so nicely shrink-wrapped. I'm all for ethical treatment.

One of these days I'm gonna have to kill one of the chickens, cows or other animals I eat. I think that if you're going to eat meat, you should be willing to kill it and butcher it yourself.

Most people these days probably couldn't. I don't know how to skin animals, what is up with that? That should be a basic skill, right? On the upside, I do know how to clean chickens and fish. Hurray!

[Grebdron]

Originally posted by Jim H
One of these days I'm gonna have to kill one of the chickens, cows or other animals I eat. I think that if you're going to eat meat, you should be willing to kill it and butcher it yourself.

Most people these days probably couldn't. I don't know how to skin animals, what is up with that? That should be a basic skill, right? On the upside, I do know how to clean chickens and fish. Hurray!

I spent a summer with my grandparents back in teh early 80's. Got to know the cows pretty well. Then watched them be shot and butchered.

Didn't eat another piece of meat for the whole summer.

Like I said...MY meat was never alive. My meat is born cut into steaks, and wrapped.

Hypocritical?

Yes.

[C-Desecration-]

This whole argument is something of a lost cause, isn't it? Do you honestly believe that KFC is the only chain that treats their chickens in an innapropriate manner? That is, if they even do (I'm still not clear on that).

But hell, I suppose I'm part of the solution. I don't eat fast-food period. Yay me.

[Jim H]

Originally posted by Grebdron
I spent a summer with my grandparents back in teh early 80's. Got to know the cows pretty well. Then watched them be shot and butchered.

Didn't eat another piece of meat for the whole summer.

Like I said...MY meat was never alive. My meat is born cut into steaks, and wrapped.

Hypocritical?

Yes.

http://leph.tripod.com/winnar.txt

[Jim H]

Originally posted by C-Desecration-
This whole argument is something of a lost cause, isn't it? Do you honestly believe that KFC is the only chain that treats their chickens in an innapropriate manner? That is, if they even do (I'm still not clear on that).

But hell, I suppose I'm part of the solution. I don't eat fast-food period. Yay me.

Wendy's, Burger King and McDonald's essentially gave into PETA's demands. I don't know about any other chains. Their suppliers are pretty humane, especially Burger King's.

[Reigh Kaufman]

I don't eat meat on medical grounds.

But when I am not at the doctor, I eat it all the time.

*This remark has been brought to you today by the letters, B, C and V.

[James Logan]

Originally posted by Jim H


Most people these days probably couldn't. I don't know how to skin animals, what is up with that? That should be a basic skill, right? On the upside, I do know how to clean chickens and fish. Hurray!

I've killed, skinned, cleaned and cooked rabbits on three occasions. Former boy-scout.
Hurray too!

[Twisted Sister]

Originally posted by James Logan
I've killed, skinned, cleaned and cooked rabbits on three occasions. Former boy-scout.
Hurray too!

Is it true what they say about boy-scouts, Logan? That you're always prepared? ;)

[blankpage]

Well, KFC tastes good, so that's all that matters to me.

[Jim H]

Originally posted by James Logan
I've killed, skinned, cleaned and cooked rabbits on three occasions. Former boy-scout.
Hurray too!

We didn't learn things like that in Boy Scouts. You know, useful things. We learned how to make Christmas decorations and such. The PC thugs got to the boy scouts I guess.

[Jon Lyrik]

The reason why she is doing this isn't because of the how they slaughter chickens (that's only to gain more publicity and PETA support).

She has a stomach in each of her breasts, and she ate too much KFC in her life, making them abnormally large, more than her liking. So she's secretly blaming KFC for giving her more breast fat.

Reminds me of those irresponisble morons who sued McDonalds for "making" them fat.

[James Logan]

Originally posted by Twisted Sister
Is it true what they say about boy-scouts, Logan? That you're always prepared? ;)

*pulls out a condom*

...Yeah. ;)

Sidenote: you know, sis', if all this sexual innuendo keeps goin', they're gonna cast us in the next James Bond movie... ;)

Originally posted by Jim H
We didn't learn things like that in Boy Scouts. You know, useful things. We learned how to make Christmas decorations and such. The PC thugs got to the boy scouts I guess.

Enroll in the French Unitarian Boy Scouts, brother! Learn to kill, prepare and cook animals; learn to hide a joint from your parents; learn to fight impressive thugs; learn to spend two days with no sleep and no food hiding in a forest in the middle of December in a mock man hunt; get up at 6 on a Sunday morning to do push-ups and then celebrate mass in Latin; and last but not least, spend your evenings around a fire laughing at graphic sex jokes!

Ah...those were the days. And I'm not even making all that up...that really was my life as a boy-scout. Different mentalities, I guess. ;)

[Jim H]

Originally posted by James Logan
*pulls out a condom*

...Yeah. ;)

Sidenote: you know, sis', if all this sexual innuendo keeps goin', they're gonna cast us in the next James Bond movie... ;)



Enroll in the French Unitarian Boy Scouts, brother! Learn to kill, prepare and cook animals; learn to hide a joint from your parents; learn to fight impressive thugs; learn to spend two days with no sleep and no food hiding in a forest in the middle of December in a mock man hunt; get up at 6 on a Sunday morning to do push-ups and then celebrate mass in Latin; and last but not least, spend your evenings around a fire laughing at graphic sex jokes!

Ah...those were the days. And I'm not even making all that up...that really was my life as a boy-scout. Different mentalities, I guess. ;)

How old were you when you were in the scouts? I was in like 5th grade, so I was like 11.

[James Logan]

Originally posted by Jim H
How old were you when you were in the scouts? I was in like 5th grade, so I was like 11.

Three years, between ages 12 and 15.

We better talk about this via PM, Jim...or Nate's gonna come cracking down on us. ;)

[Twisted Sister]

Originally posted by James Logan
[B
Enroll in the French Unitarian Boy Scouts, brother! Learn to kill, prepare and cook animals; learn to hide a joint from your parents; learn to fight impressive thugs; learn to spend two days with no sleep and no food hiding in a forest in the middle of December in a mock man hunt; get up at 6 on a Sunday morning to do push-ups and then celebrate mass in Latin; and last but not least, spend your evenings around a fire laughing at graphic sex jokes!
[/B]

Jesus, that explains ALOT! ;)