Squirrel_X
11-10-2003, 12:55 PM
*POTENTIAL SPOILER? I DUNNO, I JUST DONT WANNA PISS ANYONE OFF*
Ok, lets preface this rant with this statement: I like guns, I know more than the average person will ever care to know about guns, and im sick and tired of how guns are used in cinema. For example:
1) 95% OF THE TIME (or more!) a character takes the clip out of an automatic pistol/rifle/etc. and it is therefore rendered "safe" WRONG! Everyone knows that a round is automatically chambered when the previous round has been fired. (Damn that pisses me off...)
2) OMFG, how many rounds do these guns hold?!?!? Jesus H. Christ! I've seen .45 pistols (which weren't high capacity) fire upwards of 13+ rounds without reloading. I've seen revolvers fire more than 10+ rounds! Case in point, in Matrix Revolutions (which all in all wasn't a "horrible" movie yet wasn't "great") when the Trainman is shooting at Morpheus et. al. he fires his revolver an ungodly amount of times. In fact, I find it pleasantly suprising when someone does reload their gun or runs out of ammo during a movie [I am one of those people that count every round fired from a particular gun (if I can tell what it is)]. Now, I am not averse to a particular character carrying 50+ clips of ammunition, just as long as they periodically switch them.
3) How about some REALISTIC gunshot deaths fer chrissakes. I mean if you get shot virtually anywhere short of the heart, brain, femoral artery or the aorta you are gonna live longer than 2.5sec while you fall to the ground gurgling on your own blood (ok add throat to the aforementioned list). At least Tarantino did it right in Resevoir Dogs, but I got my beef with QT too.
Ok this really doesn't fit anywhere but im gonna say it anyway...God Damn you Quentin Tarantino....Yes I said it. You are such an intelligent and provocative filmmaker who is able to incorporate a variety of different source materials into a film and make it great (i.e. Kill Bill). HOWEVER...even with all your "might and majesty", is it POSSIBLE to take a little time to review something that is VERY EASY to pick up and correct an error that should not have been made?!??! This is what I am talking about: In Kill Bill, when it shows a shot of the revolver shooting a bullet out into Uma Thurman's character's head (from Uma's p.o.v.) THE BULLET IS NOT SPINNING! You even took the care to show the rifling inside the barrel of the revolver yet you did not care to rotate the bullet....I am ashamed. However Resevoir Dogs more than makes up for any wrongdoing so I take my hasty words back! :D
P.S. Speaking of guns and people getting shot in movies, does anyone know of a character to whom I refer as "The Bearded Chinaman?" I swear to god this guy is in every movie in which the bad guy needs cannon fodder to be blown away by the "good guy". He's, well, hes a Chinese guy with a beard. He was in pretty much every shoot-em-up movie during the craze in the 80's and I've seen him in a few movies here and there since then. BTW, if anyone actually knows this person's name, don't tell me, I think the legend of the Bearded Chinaman is better than the legend of George Win Lee or something like that. I just wanna know if anyone knows who I'm talking about.
Ok, lets preface this rant with this statement: I like guns, I know more than the average person will ever care to know about guns, and im sick and tired of how guns are used in cinema. For example:
1) 95% OF THE TIME (or more!) a character takes the clip out of an automatic pistol/rifle/etc. and it is therefore rendered "safe" WRONG! Everyone knows that a round is automatically chambered when the previous round has been fired. (Damn that pisses me off...)
2) OMFG, how many rounds do these guns hold?!?!? Jesus H. Christ! I've seen .45 pistols (which weren't high capacity) fire upwards of 13+ rounds without reloading. I've seen revolvers fire more than 10+ rounds! Case in point, in Matrix Revolutions (which all in all wasn't a "horrible" movie yet wasn't "great") when the Trainman is shooting at Morpheus et. al. he fires his revolver an ungodly amount of times. In fact, I find it pleasantly suprising when someone does reload their gun or runs out of ammo during a movie [I am one of those people that count every round fired from a particular gun (if I can tell what it is)]. Now, I am not averse to a particular character carrying 50+ clips of ammunition, just as long as they periodically switch them.
3) How about some REALISTIC gunshot deaths fer chrissakes. I mean if you get shot virtually anywhere short of the heart, brain, femoral artery or the aorta you are gonna live longer than 2.5sec while you fall to the ground gurgling on your own blood (ok add throat to the aforementioned list). At least Tarantino did it right in Resevoir Dogs, but I got my beef with QT too.
Ok this really doesn't fit anywhere but im gonna say it anyway...God Damn you Quentin Tarantino....Yes I said it. You are such an intelligent and provocative filmmaker who is able to incorporate a variety of different source materials into a film and make it great (i.e. Kill Bill). HOWEVER...even with all your "might and majesty", is it POSSIBLE to take a little time to review something that is VERY EASY to pick up and correct an error that should not have been made?!??! This is what I am talking about: In Kill Bill, when it shows a shot of the revolver shooting a bullet out into Uma Thurman's character's head (from Uma's p.o.v.) THE BULLET IS NOT SPINNING! You even took the care to show the rifling inside the barrel of the revolver yet you did not care to rotate the bullet....I am ashamed. However Resevoir Dogs more than makes up for any wrongdoing so I take my hasty words back! :D
P.S. Speaking of guns and people getting shot in movies, does anyone know of a character to whom I refer as "The Bearded Chinaman?" I swear to god this guy is in every movie in which the bad guy needs cannon fodder to be blown away by the "good guy". He's, well, hes a Chinese guy with a beard. He was in pretty much every shoot-em-up movie during the craze in the 80's and I've seen him in a few movies here and there since then. BTW, if anyone actually knows this person's name, don't tell me, I think the legend of the Bearded Chinaman is better than the legend of George Win Lee or something like that. I just wanna know if anyone knows who I'm talking about.