View Full Version : OK...Will someone explain this to me about House of the Dead???
Lizarrd
02-05-2004, 07:53 PM
OK...I thought this movie was a piece of CRAP!!! Not even gore to redeem it....if they would have included the rave massacre (or at least included it on the DVD) it might have salvaged this movie a little.
SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!
But anyway - in the end...the girl dies and I take it the main guy dips her in monster blood and this is supposed to bring her back to life...but doesnt that mean she's a zombie? And if she is, is that the pretext for HOTD2? And if she IS indeed a zombie, how come she didn't look like one or act like one????
Please explain!
rtatick
02-06-2004, 08:59 AM
The only definite answer is that it's a stupid fucking movie that should have never been made by a director who should never be allowed behind the camera again and writers that couldn't piece together a plot to save the lives of their own children.
EvilDeadGirl
02-06-2004, 08:59 AM
I hated this movie as much as the next horror loving schmoe but let me shed my $.02 on this subject.
Posted by Lizarrd - "But anyway - in the end...the girl dies and I take it the main guy dips her in monster blood and this is supposed to bring her back to life...but doesnt that mean she's a zombie? And if she is, is that the pretext for HOTD2? And if she IS indeed a zombie, how come she didn't look like one or act like one????"
That red blood shite that was in the main zombie guys lab(shows you how much I was paying attention. Can't remember its name) that brought creatures back to life you mean? I beleive that the main guy did dip her in that. Now I don't think he did it to bring her back to life persay as I don't think she was fully dead. Of course she got up and killed that main zombie guy after she was supposed to be dead so who is to say that she died? Maybe she jes' passed out from the pain?
Now, if I assumed correctly didn't the main zombie guy use that red blood shite to keep himself alive? That being the case he would have had to use it before he died thats why he wasn't a zombie like the rest of the kids on the island that were bitten and half devoured. If that's the case then the main guy would have had to take that blood shite with him to dip the chick in it more than once to continue her lifespan.
Now lets assume that she did die and the main guy dipped her in the blood shite. Ok then I think she would probably turn into a zombie but I think it might jes' take some time for the stuff to fully kick in. Sort of a slow transformation.
Either way they could use that ending as an indication of a sequel (Please NO!) however I think that maybe they used it to give it a twist ending. Or perhaps even pay some sort of fucked up homage to ROTLD 3. Maybe I'm reading too much into that though.
Anyway hoped my ramblings helped you out a bit. :)
pyscho dude
02-06-2004, 03:08 PM
Or maybe he scooped up some of it and will eventually inject some into her later.
Lizarrd
02-06-2004, 03:12 PM
According to a hilarious review I read...the dude character who lives - his name is the name of the mad scientist from the video game...and this movie was supposed to be a prequel...sooooo
This was a really bad movie. And I usually like bad zombie movies - I liked Return of the Living Dead 2, I liked Bad Taste and I loved Revenge of the Living Dead or something like it (can't find it anymore.)
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.