Psychocandy
03-07-2004, 05:14 PM
I've noticed something during the last couple of years. A new horror movie will be due and before it even gets a certificate rumours start circulating that it's going to be a PG-13 instead of the hard R that all us hardcore horror fans so love. Most times when the movie eventually hits the cinema it's an R and not the PG-13 that we expected. My question is this. Do we do this to outselves? Are we so pessimistic that we always expect the worse when it comes to future releases.
Recent classic examples of this odd behaviour are The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003 and the soon to be released Dawn Of The Dead. I can vividly recall schmoes decrying the TCM remake months before it was released for two reasons. One reason was the fact that it was a remake. Having seen the movie now I think that any worries were unjustified. The movie is very entertaining. I think that fans of the original who hate the remake are possibly being a little blinkered in their approach. I don't think it's quite as good as Tobe Hoopers classic but it's a damn fine modern horror flick that succeeded in cranking up the tension and providing some grisly gore scenes. The second reason the movie got abuse prior to certification was the expectation that it would be a toned down mainstream horror movie with no spine. A wretched PG-13 piece of shit. The reality of the situation is that the TCM remake is a pretty fucking nasty piece of work.
Later when news reached schmoe ears that a Dawn Of The Dead remake was on the cards initial expectation suggested that horror fans were expecting a toned down PG-13 zombie flick. Now the movie had been given a hard R certificate and reports suggest that there's plenty of splatter to go around. Having seen the trailer I actually think the movie looks quite cool.
So...are we a bunch of cynics? Do we expect the worse and is this a result of the horror genre being the movie equivalent of the proverbial red-headed stepchild. Do I even have a point here or have I just wasted ten minutes of my Sunday evening typing a load of crap?
Recent classic examples of this odd behaviour are The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003 and the soon to be released Dawn Of The Dead. I can vividly recall schmoes decrying the TCM remake months before it was released for two reasons. One reason was the fact that it was a remake. Having seen the movie now I think that any worries were unjustified. The movie is very entertaining. I think that fans of the original who hate the remake are possibly being a little blinkered in their approach. I don't think it's quite as good as Tobe Hoopers classic but it's a damn fine modern horror flick that succeeded in cranking up the tension and providing some grisly gore scenes. The second reason the movie got abuse prior to certification was the expectation that it would be a toned down mainstream horror movie with no spine. A wretched PG-13 piece of shit. The reality of the situation is that the TCM remake is a pretty fucking nasty piece of work.
Later when news reached schmoe ears that a Dawn Of The Dead remake was on the cards initial expectation suggested that horror fans were expecting a toned down PG-13 zombie flick. Now the movie had been given a hard R certificate and reports suggest that there's plenty of splatter to go around. Having seen the trailer I actually think the movie looks quite cool.
So...are we a bunch of cynics? Do we expect the worse and is this a result of the horror genre being the movie equivalent of the proverbial red-headed stepchild. Do I even have a point here or have I just wasted ten minutes of my Sunday evening typing a load of crap?