PDA

View Full Version : Howard Stern Taken off Air


free
04-08-2004, 10:48 PM
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040409/ap_on_go_ot/fcc_howard_stern&cid=513&ncid=716

Clear Channel Drops Stern on FCC Threat


By JONATHAN D. SALANT, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The nation's largest radio chain dropped the country's best-known shock jock Thursday after federal regulators proposed fining it $495,000 for sexually explicit material on the Howard Stern show.


As part of its stepped-up enforcement of indecency regulations, a unanimous Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) fined Clear Channel Communications the maximum $27,500 for each of 18 alleged violations. Regulators departed from their norm by citing Clear Channel for multiple violations in a single broadcast rather than simply issuing a single fine for an entire show.


John Hogan, president of Clear Channel Radio, said the government's crackdown on indecency has gotten his company's attention.


"Mr. Stern's show has created a great liability for us and other broadcasters who air it," said Hogan, who suspended Stern in February from the six Clear Channel stations that carried him. "The Congress and the FCC (news - web sites) are even beginning to look at revoking station licenses. That's a risk we're just not willing to take."


Clear Channel has 30 days to contest the fine. The company last month agreed to pay a record $755,000 indecency fine for broadcasts by the disc jockey known as "Bubba the Love Sponge," who was fired.


In a statement posted on his Web site, Stern characterized the fine as furtherance of a "witch hunt" against him by the Bush administration, which he says is punishing him for his criticism of the president.


"It is pretty shocking that governmental interference into our rights and free speech takes place in the U.S.," he said. "It's hard to reconcile this with the 'land of the free' and the 'home of the brave.'"


Stern's nationally syndicated show features graphic sexual discussion and humor. It appears on more than 30 stations — most of them owned by Viacom Inc.'s Infinity Broadcasting unit — and draws millions of die-hard listeners.


Infinity spokesman Dana McClintock said the company has no plans to take any action against Stern.


Last month, the FCC proposed fining Infinity $27,500 for a Stern show broadcast July 26, 2001, on WKRK-FM in Detroit. Infinity paid $1.7 million in 1995 to settle various violations by Stern.


The Center for Public Integrity, a watchdog group, said fines against Stern accounted for almost half of the $4 million in penalties proposed by the FCC since 1990.


Critics who bemoan a growing coarseness of the public airwaves say the FCC and Congress need to dramatically increase fines and enforcement to ensure major broadcasting companies don't see occasional fines as simply a cost of doing business.


The House has voted to raise the maximum fine to $500,000 and to require the FCC to consider revoking a broadcast license after three indecency violations. Similar legislation is pending in the Senate.


"A $27,500 fine to a company that does $27 billion worth of business is less than a mosquito on a windshield," said L. Brent Bozell III, president of the Parents Television Council, a conservative advocacy group. "It is just so insignificant as to be laughable."


Federal law bars radio stations and over-the-air television channels from airing references to sexual and excretory functions between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children may be tuning in. The rules do not apply to cable and satellite channels or satellite radio.


A listener complained about Stern's April 9, 2003, show on a Fort Lauderdale, Fla., station. The show contained discussions about sex accompanied by flatulence sounds. The FCC action came at the end of the one-year deadline for it to act.


Previously, when the commission has fined broadcasters it has been for the contents of an entire show. And it normally only levied the penalty against stations mentioned in a complaint.



In this case, though the complaint only involved the Fort Lauderdale station, the commission determined there were three indecency violations during the program and fined Clear Channel for all six of its stations that aired the show for a total of 18 citations.

"Today's decision is a step forward toward imposing meaningful fines," Commissioner Michael Copps said.

Though the commission received no complaints from listeners to Infinity stations, it is looking into fining that company, too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

jeo4
04-08-2004, 11:10 PM
Fascism is alive and well at the FCC.

SkyNet
04-09-2004, 12:03 AM
FUCK THE FCC

FUCK PRESIDENT BUSH

HOWARD STERN FOR PRESIDENT 2008

seriously man... this shit is sooo fucking irritating.. the man has brought in so much money for all these people.. and just because he hates the president RIGHTFULLY FUCKING SO.... how can anyone respect a man who has a lower IQ than a fucking 3 year old baby with down syndrome.

I support Stern in anything he does... he is 150% correct on this matter and deserves far more respect than he gets.

And you know it is all because he is Howard Stern... fuckin Oprah.. horrible ass Oprah.. gets to say all the stupid shit she wants about fuckin TOSSING SALADS and shit.. but stern doesnt like the president and all this shit happens!

Lynn Minmei
04-09-2004, 12:06 AM
Honestly, I think that Stern hating Bush has nothing to do with him being taken off the air.

That's like saying that the fact that I like spaghetti accounts for my small penis size (This is purely hypothetical, of course).

The FCC is a group of old podgies that make conservatives look bad. Stern was taken off the air because his show is almost purely sexual, and some people can't stand that.

Thank God that these people will eventually die off and another generation gets to replace them.

SkyNet
04-09-2004, 01:11 AM
well.. Stern has said on his show several times that it was his Anti- Bush comments that set Clear Channel on the war path against him. Because Clear Channel is in bed with the bush administration (just like the Oil Companies.. but thats a whole different topic.. not fit for a movie forum).

The FCC is just a bunch of pansies that had to act because Janet Jackson showed her boobs.... and to be honest... More tits get shown on ANY other show on tv than were shown on Super Bowl Sunday.. bunch of horse shit

Lynn Minmei
04-09-2004, 01:17 AM
Meh, I know Stern really hates Bush, a lot of people do, but the FCC is going against him because of the over-sensitive nature of the post-Janet Jackson world, not to mention the numerous complaints that they've been given (By people who really shouldn't be listening to Stern anyways).

I don't recall the President ever saying anything about the FCC.

SkyNet
04-09-2004, 01:53 PM
i def agree with ya Lynn... but i think that if it wasnt for Sterns Anti-Bush comments than i sincerely believe Clear Channel would have taken the fine and given Stern a slap on the wrist. They have the money.

Lynn Minmei
04-09-2004, 02:20 PM
Originally posted by SkyNet
i def agree with ya Lynn... but i think that if it wasnt for Sterns Anti-Bush comments than i sincerely believe Clear Channel would have taken the fine and given Stern a slap on the wrist. They have the money.

My new enemies:

1.) Clear Channel

2.) The FCC

3.) The MPAA

4.) Jack Valenti

5.) Ernestine Abdul

JCR
04-10-2004, 01:59 PM
Wait a moment, ain't you lot supposed to be the land of the free? Hardy har ha ha. :rolleyes:

Haddonfield
04-10-2004, 03:08 PM
***

Lynn Minmei
04-10-2004, 08:00 PM
Originally posted by JCR
Wait a moment, ain't you lot supposed to be the land of the free? Hardy har ha ha. :rolleyes:

Last time I checked, I wasn't being opressed in any way or unable to speak my mind.

So, yes. Yes we are the home of the free.

Nate6
04-11-2004, 10:23 AM
Originally posted by Lynn Minmei
5.) Ernestine Abdul

She'd be pissing her pants if she read that.

Well, she'd be pissing her pants anyway, I guess.

agentsands
04-11-2004, 11:11 AM
The censorship in the US is getting stifling....and a bit scary.

Jim Morrison
04-11-2004, 01:08 PM
Well, I do agree to an extent that his thoughts on Bush may have been a small reason why he was taken off the air.

Howard Stern has been on the air for what, a decade? Just now they are realizing his show is full of sexual disscusion and vulgar innuendos? He got in trouble for describing different sexual acts like a "blumpkin" in 2004. If he got in trouble for saying "blumpkin" in 1984. I would agree with you. But c'mon, the man is one of the most popular radiop hosts in the world, not to mention a huge cult following. He has been discussing blumpkins, ceaser salads, and sexual acts with midgets for years. And now suddenly, Nipplegate happens and the world goes bezerk. It really is a shame to see a man who is a prime reason on why America does represent free speech be taken off the air. This suddent outbreak of uneeded censorship is just really hitting hard. Next thing you know, they'll be bleeping out "communist" or any anti-Bush statements or any moderatley sexual words. If the world sees one more exposed nipple, we could go to war.

syxxpac
04-11-2004, 01:31 PM
Too late.

Haddonfield
04-11-2004, 07:09 PM
Originally posted by Jim Morrison
Well, I do agree to an extent that his thoughts on Bush may have been a small reason why he was taken off the air.

Howard Stern has been on the air for what, a decade? Just now they are realizing his show is full of sexual disscusion and vulgar innuendos? He got in trouble for describing different sexual acts like a "blumpkin" in 2004. If he got in trouble for saying "blumpkin" in 1984. I would agree with you. But c'mon, the man is one of the most popular radiop hosts in the world, not to mention a huge cult following. He has been discussing blumpkins, ceaser salads, and sexual acts with midgets for years. And now suddenly, Nipplegate happens and the world goes bezerk. It really is a shame to see a man who is a prime reason on why America does represent free speech be taken off the air. This suddent outbreak of uneeded censorship is just really hitting hard. Next thing you know, they'll be bleeping out "communist" or any anti-Bush statements or any moderatley sexual words. If the world sees one more exposed nipple, we could go to war.


Amen.

jeo4
04-11-2004, 08:06 PM
Originally posted by JCR
Wait a moment, ain't you lot supposed to be the land of the free? Hardy har ha ha. :rolleyes:

At least me here don't wear skirts to show their family lineage. :D