Ender
09-08-2004, 06:13 PM
First of all, a quick mod note, even though this thread focuses largely on a current movie, I put it here in general because I'm just using that current movie as an example to build an argument of a more general nature. That's my call anyway.
Now, on to the main attraction.
There's no such thing as mixed feelings when it comes to writer/director Paul WS Anderson. Some people like him, some people hate him. Me, I'm the hating kind.
Most people hate Anderson on the basis that he "has no talent" and "makes bad movies". Personally though, I don't think that's true. Let me explain, it's no secret that the reason studios like Anderson is because he can turn a profit on a low budget. To do this, he subscribes to the "good enough" method of film-making. "Was Resident Evil any good?" "Well, it was good enough...".
I think Paul Anderson actually has a good eye as a director and I think his movies are enjoyable, to a degree. The reason I hate him is because he's just plain lazy. In every movie he's ever created, he had a great opportunity to make something dynamic and original, but instead, he just made something that was "good enough".
Let's use Alien vs Predator by way of example, just because I saw it most recently. If we wander off-topic in this discussion, I'll do similar line-ups on other movies as well.
What He Could Have Done: Given us a movie about Aliens fighting Predators.
What He Did: Gave us a movie about boring humans who get offed, at the end of which Aliens fight Predators. Not even a fight really, just a little brawl. A minor melee. A tussle. Bit of a scrap. They had an arm-wrestling contest, actually. And a frank exchange of ideals. They talked things out over tea. Or maybe just had a "You Got Served"-style dance competition (okay, so it wasn't THAT bad...).
What He Could Have Done: Given us an R rated movie in which Aliens eviscerate people, Predator's skin their victims, and human use swear words.
What He Did: Gave us a movie where all the killings are done off camera, a human being can be impaled without bleeding, and the word "motherfucker" gets cut off halfway.
What He Could Have Done: Made some characters that we the audience care about and relate to.
What He Did: Gave us the same one dimensional "team of specialists" characters that he uses in EVERY MOVIE.
What He Could Have Done: Explained the backstory in a credible and plausible manner.
What He Did: Read it off a bunch of "hieroglyphics".
What He Could Have Done: Came up with a backstory that was interesting and original.
What He Did: Went with the "aliens as gods" thing that we've all seen before.
What He Could Have Done: Justice to both franchises.
What He Did: Made the Predators look like pussies.
I think any semi-motived person could have given us a decent movie here, a movie following the "What He Could Have Done" rules, and I think that any semi-motivated person could have made a good Resident Evil or Event Horizon as well. He has the talent, he has the means, so why does he keep churning out 5/10 sort of flicks?
My explanation, he's just plain lazy, and quite honestly, I'll take a flat-out bad director over a "talented but lazy" director any day of the week.
Now, on to the main attraction.
There's no such thing as mixed feelings when it comes to writer/director Paul WS Anderson. Some people like him, some people hate him. Me, I'm the hating kind.
Most people hate Anderson on the basis that he "has no talent" and "makes bad movies". Personally though, I don't think that's true. Let me explain, it's no secret that the reason studios like Anderson is because he can turn a profit on a low budget. To do this, he subscribes to the "good enough" method of film-making. "Was Resident Evil any good?" "Well, it was good enough...".
I think Paul Anderson actually has a good eye as a director and I think his movies are enjoyable, to a degree. The reason I hate him is because he's just plain lazy. In every movie he's ever created, he had a great opportunity to make something dynamic and original, but instead, he just made something that was "good enough".
Let's use Alien vs Predator by way of example, just because I saw it most recently. If we wander off-topic in this discussion, I'll do similar line-ups on other movies as well.
What He Could Have Done: Given us a movie about Aliens fighting Predators.
What He Did: Gave us a movie about boring humans who get offed, at the end of which Aliens fight Predators. Not even a fight really, just a little brawl. A minor melee. A tussle. Bit of a scrap. They had an arm-wrestling contest, actually. And a frank exchange of ideals. They talked things out over tea. Or maybe just had a "You Got Served"-style dance competition (okay, so it wasn't THAT bad...).
What He Could Have Done: Given us an R rated movie in which Aliens eviscerate people, Predator's skin their victims, and human use swear words.
What He Did: Gave us a movie where all the killings are done off camera, a human being can be impaled without bleeding, and the word "motherfucker" gets cut off halfway.
What He Could Have Done: Made some characters that we the audience care about and relate to.
What He Did: Gave us the same one dimensional "team of specialists" characters that he uses in EVERY MOVIE.
What He Could Have Done: Explained the backstory in a credible and plausible manner.
What He Did: Read it off a bunch of "hieroglyphics".
What He Could Have Done: Came up with a backstory that was interesting and original.
What He Did: Went with the "aliens as gods" thing that we've all seen before.
What He Could Have Done: Justice to both franchises.
What He Did: Made the Predators look like pussies.
I think any semi-motived person could have given us a decent movie here, a movie following the "What He Could Have Done" rules, and I think that any semi-motivated person could have made a good Resident Evil or Event Horizon as well. He has the talent, he has the means, so why does he keep churning out 5/10 sort of flicks?
My explanation, he's just plain lazy, and quite honestly, I'll take a flat-out bad director over a "talented but lazy" director any day of the week.