PDA

View Full Version : I'm calling it. Bush / Cheney wins!


Indy in IN
11-03-2004, 09:36 AM
I ain't scared. Ohio looks all but wrapped up. Iowa, New Mexico, and Nevada look to be too. Since this board is about 80% democrat, let the bickering begin!!

Just so no one can complain to much, Bush won the popular vote too!!


McCain 2008!!

BorderEevilIII
11-03-2004, 09:43 AM
ummmmm yeah..........
well I thought I was gonna wake up to George AGAIN for four MORE years :mad:

It looks like the results from when I HAD to go to sleep has NOT changed yet :confused:

jeo4
11-03-2004, 11:13 AM
I'm ready for a break from the campaigns right now...but I'm pulling for Colin Powell in 2008.

Indy in IN
11-03-2004, 12:52 PM
John Kerry concedes. I would call it offical now.

chilli pepper
11-03-2004, 07:37 PM
I hope you people are happy with yourselves.....:mad:....:D . I'm a democrat all the way,but I dont care that Kerry lost becuase this country was going to shit either way, except now we'll get there alot quicker.

free
11-04-2004, 03:10 AM
I read that most people who voted for Bush, said they voted for his "moral values".

How could any sane person vote for someone who lied to the American people, pushed through a bill that pinched personal liberties and tried to deny Americans the right to marry whom they love, sent troops over to a country that posed no credible threat to our nation, end up being responsible for the deaths of over 1,000 US troops and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians, on the basis of his "moral values".

I wonder if people find the irony in saying how bad it is for a religion to run a country in the Middle East.

Indy in IN
11-04-2004, 05:51 PM
Originally posted by free
I read that most people who voted for Bush, said they voted for his "moral values".

How could any sane person vote for someone who lied to the American people, pushed through a bill that pinched personal liberties and tried to deny Americans the right to marry whom they love, sent troops over to a country that posed no credible threat to our nation, end up being responsible for the deaths of over 1,000 US troops and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians, on the basis of his "moral values".

I wonder if people find the irony in saying how bad it is for a religion to run a country in the Middle East.


Does this mean nothing to you?

Tom Grey answers David Crow's request the empirical basis for his statement on the number of dead under Saddam Hussein. "See http://www.gbn.org/ArticleDisplayServlet.srv?aid=2400&msp=1242 Here is an excerpt:":Along with other human rights organizations, The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq. Human Rights Watch reports that in one operation alone, the Anfal, Saddam killed 100,000 Kurdish Iraqis. Another 500,000 are estimated to have died in Saddam's needless war with Iran. Coldly taken as a daily average for the 24 years of Saddam's reign, these numbers give us a horrifying picture of between 70 and 125 civilian deaths per day for every one of Saddam's 8,000-odd days in power"

I guess Hitler wasn't such a bad guy either. Making truces with the countries that border Germany just before he invaded them. The whole Death Camp thing. Was WWII a pointless war too?? Saddam was heading the same direction.

How quickly we forget.

Sure, save a tree, but who gives a ......about a whole country.


That's why I am a Republican.

MacReady
11-04-2004, 06:05 PM
Originally posted by Indy in IN
Does this mean nothing to you?

Tom Grey answers David Crow's request the empirical basis for his statement on the number of dead under Saddam Hussein. "See http://www.gbn.org/ArticleDisplayServlet.srv?aid=2400&msp=1242 Here is an excerpt:":Along with other human rights organizations, The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq. Human Rights Watch reports that in one operation alone, the Anfal, Saddam killed 100,000 Kurdish Iraqis. Another 500,000 are estimated to have died in Saddam's needless war with Iran. Coldly taken as a daily average for the 24 years of Saddam's reign, these numbers give us a horrifying picture of between 70 and 125 civilian deaths per day for every one of Saddam's 8,000-odd days in power"

I guess Hitler wasn't such a bad guy either. Making truces with the countries that border Germany just before he invaded them. The whole Death Camp thing. Was WWII a pointless war too?? Saddam was heading the same direction.

How quickly we forget.

Sure, save a tree, but who gives a ......about a whole country.


That's why I am a Republican.

Are you aware that there's other countries with people who are having their human right violated? Are you aware that Ronal Reagan, a republican, elected alot of evil south American dictators into power?

America isn't a righteous country, so I don't see how it being responsible for killing 10000 Iraqis cilivilians (whom you insist that Saddam killing them is evil) is less evil than what that guy did.

Indiana Sev
11-04-2004, 06:17 PM
There is already a thread about the election and its repercussions. Let's try to keep all ideas revolving around that, there.

http://www.joblo.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=84805

Thread closed.