PDA

View Full Version : Ashcroft Resigns - New Cabinet Members To Be Named


jeo4
11-10-2004, 11:24 AM
Speculation follows Cabinet resignations
Source: Gonzales is leading candidate to replace Ashcroft
Wednesday, November 10, 2004 Posted: 11:13 AM EST (1613 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The White House could announce a replacement for outgoing Attorney General John Ashcroft as early as today, a senior administration official told CNN.

Alberto Gonzales, the White House general counsel, is the leading candidate for the post, the source said.

Gonzales, a former Texas Supreme Court justice, was named White House counsel in January 2001. He had also previously served as Texas Secretary of State.

If named and confirmed in the post, Gonzales would be the first Hispanic American to hold the Cabinet position.

Also mentioned as possible nominees are Marc Racicot -- the Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign chairman and former Montana governor -- and Larry Thompson, a former deputy attorney general.

The White House announced Tuesday evening that Ashcroft and Commerce Secretary Don Evans would be leaving the administration. (Special Report: President Bush, the Second Term)

Ashcroft's resignation will become effective upon confirmation of a successor, Justice Department officials said. Evans will stay into January, according to The Associated Press.

Ashcroft, a former senator and two-term governor of Missouri, has garnered criticism during his nearly four years as attorney general on issues like the Patriot Act, which backers say helps the government in its fight against terrorism and critics say infringes on civil liberties.

In July, Ashcroft released a progress report and said the Patriot Act "saves lives" and was "al Qaeda's worst nightmare." Portions of the law are set to expire in December 2005.

His confirmation hearing in January 2000 was filled with sharply divided debate. Ashcroft's critics highlighted his longstanding conservative political and religious views -- especially his anti-abortion stance.

Yet those views have also made him a favorite of many on the right, especially religious conservatives.

Eventually the Senate voted 58-42 for his confirmation -- an usually narrow margin for confirming a Cabinet official.

Ashcroft was treated for gallstone pancreatitis in March, and his recovery kept him out of the office for nearly a month. In his handwritten resignation letter, dated November 2, he told Bush the job has been "both rewarding and depleting." (Text of resignation letter)

"I believe that the Department of Justice would be well served by new leadership and fresh inspiration," he said. "I believe that my energies and talents should be directed toward other challenging horizons."

In a statement from the White House, Bush said Ashcroft "has worked tirelessly to help make our country safer" and "served our nation with honor, distinction, and integrity."

"During his four years at the Department of Justice, John has transformed the department to make combating terrorism the top priority, including making sure our law enforcement officials have the tools they need to disrupt and prevent attacks," Bush said.

Bush: Evans a trusted friend and adviser
Evans, who served as Bush's campaign chairman in 2000, is a longtime friend and one of the president's closest advisers. In his resignation, dated Tuesday, he congratulated Bush on last week's election results but said he concluded "with deep regret that it is time for me to return home."

"It is a blessing to have served America with such an extraordinary leader and a true friend," he said. (Text of resignation letter)

In response, Bush called Evans "one of my most trusted friends and advisers" and "a valuable member of my economic team."

"Don has worked to advance economic security and prosperity for all Americans. He has worked steadfastly to make sure America continues to be the best place in the world to do business," the president said.

President Bush met with his Cabinet on Thursday and held a news conference later that day. At that time Bush said he had yet to make any decisions about replacements for any people who resigned.

"I don't know who they'll be," he said. "It's inevitable. There'll be some changes. It happens in every administration."

Bush said Thursday that he was proud of every member of the Cabinet and his staff, and that he understood that they had exhausting jobs and made many family sacrifices.

CNN's Suzanne Malveaux, John King and Terry Frieden contributed to this report.

Source: CNN.com

Twisted Sister
11-10-2004, 12:18 PM
Amen, Ashcroft is a loon.

Grebdron
11-10-2004, 02:45 PM
Originally posted by Twisted Sister
Amen, Ashcroft is a loon.

Careful what you wish for. Gonzalez believes the Geneva Convention is obsolete, adn is a former partner of teh law firm that defended Enron.

I read a funny somewhere else, that the only difference we'll notice is the White House music will change from a Gospel CD to a Mariachi.

jeo4
11-10-2004, 03:07 PM
Hahahahaha!! That's just evil, Greb. Naturally, I love it.

Twisted Sister
11-10-2004, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by Grebdron
Careful what you wish for. Gonzalez believes the Geneva Convention is obsolete, adn is a former partner of teh law firm that defended Enron.

I read a funny somewhere else, that the only difference we'll notice is the White House music will change from a Gospel CD to a Mariachi.

Greb,

Funny you'd say that, because that's what I thought as I was typing my previous post: "What if Gonzalez is even worse?" Hard to imagine, but only time will tell...

JohnTheHenchman
11-10-2004, 08:51 PM
I don't have a problem with terrorists not being considered under Geneva Convention rules. They're not a uniformed military, or even a military at all.

<3mekthx
11-10-2004, 11:14 PM
Ashcroft had an incredibly hard job in prosecuting the War On Terror. Congress OVERWHELMLY voted to give him the Patriot Act. It's a very touchy subject. Given the circumstances, I think he was an O.K Attorney General.

The Postmaster General
11-11-2004, 04:11 PM
From what I hear, Gonzalas was named to the Texas Supreme Court without ever having actually tried a case, or written in the journal of law.

Anyone else heard this?



I don't have a problem with terrorists not being considered under Geneva Convention rules. They're not a uniformed military, or even a military at all.

huh?

There are different terrorists groups. Some are militias, some have uniforms - none would be a military, as a military is controled by a nation.

Are you saying like the terrorists who have a milias, with uniforms - they deserve better treatment than the ones who don't

Other terrorists like McVeigh, wouldn't fall under GC guidelines anyway.

It seems like you are confusing terrorists with an army or militia. Or are you saying the people we captured in Iraq, and Pakistan shouldn't fall under GC guidelines because they aren't backed by their government?

Help me out here. Because if you are saying what I think you are saying, which is that terrorists aren't represented by a form of government, thereby disqualifying themselves as being a military -- then you are making a strong case against the war in Iraq - one I've never thought of, but think is very valid.

Squid Vicious
11-11-2004, 09:20 PM
One down, two to go.

jeo4
11-12-2004, 09:39 AM
Originally posted by Squid Vicious
One down, two to go.

Which two?

I would choose:

Donald Rumsfeld - Worst Defense Secretary ever.

Dick Cheney - Hell, his heart may kill him before he leaves office anyway.

Twisted Sister
11-12-2004, 11:27 AM
Originally posted by jeo4
Which two?

I would choose:

Donald Rumsfeld - Worst Defense Secretary ever.

Dick Cheney - Hell, his heart may kill him before he leaves office anyway.

Nice picks, Jeo!

jeo4
11-12-2004, 11:56 AM
Thank you! :)