PDA

View Full Version : 2 Jackson Jurors Regret Decision to Acquit


ilovemovies
08-08-2005, 11:51 PM
from yahoo:


Jackson Jurors Regret Decision to Acquit 48 minutes ago

LOS ANGELES - Two of the jurors who voted to acquit singer Michael Jackson of child molestation and other charges say they regret their decisions.

Jurors Eleanor Cook and Ray Hultman, who both have pending book deals, said in a televised interview Monday night that they believed the singer's young accuser was sexually assaulted.

"No doubt in my mind whatsoever, that boy was molested, and I also think he enjoyed to some degree being Michael Jackson's toy," Cook said on MSNBC's "Rita Cosby: Live and Direct."

Jackson defense attorney Tom Mesereau dismissed the jurors' comments as "embarrassing and outrageous" during an interview with The Associated Press.

"The bottom line is it makes no difference what they're saying. It really is a non-event," he said. "Twelve people deliberated and out of that process justice is supposed to result. Now two months later these jurors are changing their tunes. They clearly like being on TV. I'm very suspicious."

The jurors' comments will have no bearing on the verdict, which prosecutors cannot appeal.

Cook and Hultman said they agreed to go along with the other jurors when it became apparent that they would never convict the pop star. The two denied being motivated by money and tried to explain why they were coming forward now.

"There were a lot of people that were interested in this case from day one. People expect to know what's going on with their justice system and how things work," Hultman said.

Added Cook: "I'm speaking out now because I believe it's never too late to tell the truth."

Cosby asked Cook if the other jurors will be angry with her.

"They can be as angry as they want to. They ought to be ashamed. They're the ones that let a pedophile go," responded Cook, 79.

Hultman, 62, told Cosby he was upset with the way other jurors approached the case: "The thing that really got me the most was the fact that people just wouldn't take those blinders off long enough to really look at all the evidence that was there."

The New York Daily News first reported Aug. 4 that Hultman and Cook planned books and believed Jackson was guilty.

A call Monday to jury foreman Paul Rodriguez was not immediately returned.

Hultman has said that when jurors took an anonymous poll early in their deliberations he was one of three jurors who voted for conviction.

On June 13, the jurors unanimously acquitted Jackson of all charges, which alleged that he molested a 13-year-old boy, plied the boy with wine and conspired to hold him and his family captive so they would make a video rebutting a damaging television documentary.

Cook told Cosby: "The air reeked of hatred and people were angry and I had never been in an atmosphere like that before."

In June, Hultman told the AP about the verdict: "That's not to say he's an innocent man. He's just not guilty of the crimes he's been charged with."

During an appearance on ABC's "Good Morning America" with five other jurors in June, Cook was one of three who raised their hands when asked if they thought Jackson may have molested other children but not the 13-year-old boy.

"We had our suspicions, but we couldn't judge on that because it wasn't what we were there to do," she said at the time.

Hultman's book will be called "The Deliberator" and Cook's is "Guilty as Sin, Free as a Bird," said Larry Garrison, a producer who is working with both on their separate books and a combined television movie. Part of the profits from their book sales will go to charity, he said.

C-Desecration-
08-09-2005, 12:23 AM
I wanted jackson to be guilty as much as the next bloodthirsty civilian nervous about the weird guy with the funny nose, but this is just annoying.
"It's never too late to tell the truth". . .quiet.

Mr. HokeyPokey
08-09-2005, 12:30 AM
Looks like a sad effort to get the spotlight for 15 minutes.

outsyder
08-09-2005, 12:50 AM
Well, now is the perfect time to express doubt about your actions.



:rolleyes:

Shockwave
08-09-2005, 04:39 AM
Heh, way to go.

..but really, is anyone surprised?

KillerKlown
08-09-2005, 07:32 AM
Originally posted by ilovemovies
Part of the profits from their book sales will go to charity, he said.


Yeah Yeah, 0.0001% is still a part of their profits isn't it? :rolleyes:

jeo4
08-09-2005, 12:02 PM
And both have a book deal, huh? :rolleyes:

blankpage
08-09-2005, 12:06 PM
Originally posted by jeo4
And both have a book deal, huh? :rolleyes:

Well, it's never too late to have a book deal.

BorderEevilIII
08-09-2005, 01:34 PM
wheres a gavel cuz I need to knock some sense in these 2 individuals... :rolleyes:

What are they griping about? IF he was guilty or not the judge has the final say. ;)

gorysnoopy
08-10-2005, 09:40 AM
Oy and now there's another one....





Appearing on the show Tuesday, Juror Katarina Carls said she initially agreed with Cook and Hultman that Jackson was guilty, but decided she could not convict because of jury instructions that he must be acquitted if there was reasonable doubt. She said it was possible that Jackson's accuser was lying.




~YAWN~

SkyNet
08-10-2005, 12:54 PM
ya they are just tryin to create controversy by saying that, so that they can get on Larry King and whatever other talk shows will be duped by these fuck tards

Shockwave
08-10-2005, 07:00 PM
...sounds like they are all fucking idiots.

If u cant decide....DONT.

She said it was possible that Jackson's accuser was lying.

As shitty as it sounds, that would be REASONABLE DOUBT.

..

..idiots

KillerKlown
08-11-2005, 08:07 AM
They should be jailed then, for the obstruction of justice... And being money-grabbing, attention-seeking bastards.

The Mack
08-12-2005, 10:42 AM
They now believe Jackson did molest that little boy....?

The word "DUH" comes to mind.

Mr. HokeyPokey
08-12-2005, 11:25 AM
Originally posted by The Mack
They now believe Jackson did molest that little boy....?

The word "DUH" comes to mind.

And when reading that the words "found not guilty on all counts" comes to mind.

The Mack
08-12-2005, 11:54 AM
Originally posted by Mr. HokeyPokey
And when reading that the words "found not guilty on all counts" comes to mind.

Yeah, because everyone found not guilty is completely innocent. The formula is simple in this country:

Money + Fame = Not guilty

Mr. HokeyPokey
08-12-2005, 02:20 PM
Originally posted by The Mack
Yeah, because everyone found not guilty is completely innocent. The formula is simple in this country:

Money + Fame = Not guilty

Innocent until PROVEN guilty... he was found not guilty, What does that have to do with money and fame in a criminal trial?

The Mack
08-12-2005, 04:18 PM
Originally posted by Mr. HokeyPokey
What does that have to do with money and fame in a criminal trial?

Everything.

Shockwave
08-12-2005, 04:26 PM
I thought it was OJ all over again...but not as severe. I didnt feel "sorry" for the family at all in this case.

Mr-Blonde
08-15-2005, 02:57 PM
All I can say is that these people are frickin' idiots that should have their peepees whacked severely. Why the Hell would you ever acquit soemone if you thought that they were guilty? Besides which some of the charges were proven true (Jesus Juice to minors). They at least find him guilty on those! :mad: