PDA

View Full Version : Former aide: Powell WMD speech 'lowest point in my life'


Mr-Blonde
08-19-2005, 02:50 PM
source: CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/19/powell.un/index.html)

Friday, August 19, 2005

(CNN) -- A former top aide to Colin Powell says his involvement in the former secretary of state's presentation to the United Nations on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was "the lowest point" in his life.

"I wish I had not been involved in it," says Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, a longtime Powell adviser who served as his chief of staff from 2002 through 2005. "I look back on it, and I still say it was the lowest point in my life."

Wilkerson is one of several insiders interviewed for the CNN Presents documentary "Dead Wrong -- Inside an Intelligence Meltdown." The program, which airs Sunday at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET, pieces together the events leading up to the mistaken WMD intelligence that was presented to the public. A presidential commission that investigated the pre-war WMD intelligence found much of it to be "dead wrong."

Powell's speech, delivered on February 14, 2003, made the case for the war by presenting U.S. intelligence that purported to prove that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Wilkerson says the information in Powell's presentation initially came from a document he described as "sort of a Chinese menu" that was provided by the White House.

"(Powell) came through the door ... and he had in his hands a sheaf of papers, and he said, 'This is what I've got to present at the United Nations according to the White House, and you need to look at it,'" Wilkerson says in the program. "It was anything but an intelligence document. It was, as some people characterized it later, sort of a Chinese menu from which you could pick and choose."

Wilkerson and Powell spent four days and nights in a CIA conference room with then-Director George Tenet and other top officials trying to ensure the accuracy of the presentation, Wilkerson says.

"There was no way the Secretary of State was going to read off a script about serious matters of intelligence that could lead to war when the script was basically un-sourced," Wilkerson says.

In one dramatic accusation in his speech, Powell showed slides alleging that Saddam had bioweapons labs mounted on trucks that would be almost impossible to find.

"In fact, Secretary Powell was not told that one of the sources he was given as a source of this information had indeed been flagged by the Defense Intelligence Agency as a liar, a fabricator," says David Kay, who served as the CIA's chief weapons inspector in Iraq after the fall of Saddam. That source, an Iraqi defector had never been debriefed by the CIA, was known within the intelligence community as "Curveball."

After searching Iraq for several months across the summer of 2003, Kay began e-mailing Tenet to tell him the WMD evidence was falling apart. At one point, Wilkerson says, Tenet called Powell to tell him the claims about mobile bioweapons labs were apparently not true.

"George actually did call the Secretary, and said, 'I'm really sorry to have to tell you. We don't believe there were any mobile labs for making biological weapons,'" Wilkerson says in the documentary. "This was the third or fourth telephone call. And I think it's fair to say the Secretary and Mr. Tenet, at that point, ceased being close. I mean, you can be sincere and you can be honest and you can believe what you're telling the Secretary. But three or four times on substantive issues like that? It's difficult to maintain any warm feelings."

----------------------------------------------

More substantial proof that the Iraq war is and always has been a farce. The WMD claims were necessary to drum up enough support to go to war. If the Bush administration hadn't decieved all of us they'd have never got Congress' backing to go to war. Of course it also helped him to get reelected so it was a win-win for Bush and his cronies.

Fuck this corrupt terd! Clinton gets a blowjob on the job and all hell breaks loose, Bush starts a war that has turned into a quagmire with no end in sight under false pretenses and there is hardly any backlash? WTF?! :mad:

The Postmaster General
08-19-2005, 03:50 PM
I know this comment won't mean dick because it's not easily made black and white, right or left, etc.

But I want to make it anyway ---

The problem is that no one has backbone. All of these people who retired or later on come out to say "the truth" --- these people are worried about securing some sort of materialistic cushy future via not losing retirement benefits, and so on.

I don't even have a problem with rather or not these people are telling the truth. My problem is that there are people who accept this as they are either lying, bitter about something, or truthful ---- It's always taken for granted that, regardless of which side these people come from, both sides will always stand by their person's decision to not tell the truth until after the fact. --- people just accept this behavior. They accept that every once and awhile someone shouldn't get out of line in order to see something good is done. If you ask me, all sides would probably stand united if they didnt have all these spineless "yes-men" making them so damn sure of themselves.

Lynn7
08-19-2005, 11:43 PM
From what I understand Great Britain's intelligence still stands by those weapons of mass destruction findings. I will always wonder what was being taken from the country in the months before the war (cause there were definitey tractor trailers moving things oveer the borders during teh prelude to war and until we search these other countries we won't really know what used to be there by the time our soldiers arrived.

Mr-Blonde
08-20-2005, 11:50 AM
And from what I understand, British Intelligence had reservations about the fact that the Bush administration was looking for any excuses to go to war shortly after 9/11.

Read the Downing Street Memo. (http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/)