HannibalGuy
09-25-2005, 09:09 PM
discipline (n.) - 1. Training expected to produce a specific character or pattern of behavior. 2. Controlled behavior from such training. 3. A state of order based on submission to rules and authority. 4. A set of rules or methods.
principle (n.) - 1. A basic truth. 2. A rule or standard. 3. Moral or ethical standards or judgments. 4. A basic source.
Fundamentally, methodologies - to become practicable - are composed by structuring an outline determining principles that are to be practiced, acting as rules, so to speak. Henceforth, the practice [of principles] is intended to be disciplined in it's nature.
Fitting to Warriorism, one has no choice about the necessity of principle. Man has no choice about the essentiality to integrate his experiences, and subsequent knowledge into abstract ideas, i.e., principles. Hence, principles are an absolute. The only choice one has [in regards to principles] is whether these choices are true or false. Whether they represent conscious rational convictions - or a smorgasbord of invalid, random sources built upon context which leads to consequences one does not know. It is discipline that will lead man to be principled in truth.
Presentation of effects depends on action. Any and all effort producing effectual behavior depends on an applied action of discipline. Destrucity, reality-based and rational, recognizes this absolute. Doing so, shows us the nonproficiency of seeing the action of discipline [the act of discipline] as different from the product of discipline [a discipline]. Making discipline, in reference, both, the action and content - literally, one in the same - constantly reinforces the ideas we have agreed to practice so we can accomplish and succeed.
Any time man exchanges a devitalizing habit for a productive, beneficial discipline he will be tempted by conditions he has long practiced. To create concrete change, he must hold himself accountable when he surrenders to the temptations. Discipline, and the idea of it works here, as well. For, discipline connotes punishment too. If, when one reneges on his discipline of discipline(s), he is met mentally with the implication of, once again, discipline, he will keep foked, distinctively and prominently, on the concept of discipline.
Conscientiously, the constant influence of the concept of discipline forbears one's desire to rationalize his faltering and he will subjugate to the commitment he has made to discipline. For just as discipline denotes all the previously mentioned contexts, it also manifests an idea of strength and strong-willedness, empowering him to be just as he thinks. Once again, drawing us back into a impenetrable foke.
An aggressive, active, inexorable application of the concept of discipline. Passivity has ruled long enough in my book and it has no place in the way of warrior. A proclivity towards cutting oneself slack, as it pertains to the discipline of discipline, has no place when one sets forth creating their own, unique idea of Destrucity.
Seeing the world literally strengthens your commitment and stiffens the actuality of your resolve. Rampant repetitiveness of avowed dogma, and it's inherent dogmatic principles are futile, and certainly no guarantee of any success beyond the fabulous daydreaming you accomplish.
To become -- ACT AS IF. Any principle one chooses to adopt, and consequently emulate, must be suffused with the causality of discipline.
principle (n.) - 1. A basic truth. 2. A rule or standard. 3. Moral or ethical standards or judgments. 4. A basic source.
Fundamentally, methodologies - to become practicable - are composed by structuring an outline determining principles that are to be practiced, acting as rules, so to speak. Henceforth, the practice [of principles] is intended to be disciplined in it's nature.
Fitting to Warriorism, one has no choice about the necessity of principle. Man has no choice about the essentiality to integrate his experiences, and subsequent knowledge into abstract ideas, i.e., principles. Hence, principles are an absolute. The only choice one has [in regards to principles] is whether these choices are true or false. Whether they represent conscious rational convictions - or a smorgasbord of invalid, random sources built upon context which leads to consequences one does not know. It is discipline that will lead man to be principled in truth.
Presentation of effects depends on action. Any and all effort producing effectual behavior depends on an applied action of discipline. Destrucity, reality-based and rational, recognizes this absolute. Doing so, shows us the nonproficiency of seeing the action of discipline [the act of discipline] as different from the product of discipline [a discipline]. Making discipline, in reference, both, the action and content - literally, one in the same - constantly reinforces the ideas we have agreed to practice so we can accomplish and succeed.
Any time man exchanges a devitalizing habit for a productive, beneficial discipline he will be tempted by conditions he has long practiced. To create concrete change, he must hold himself accountable when he surrenders to the temptations. Discipline, and the idea of it works here, as well. For, discipline connotes punishment too. If, when one reneges on his discipline of discipline(s), he is met mentally with the implication of, once again, discipline, he will keep foked, distinctively and prominently, on the concept of discipline.
Conscientiously, the constant influence of the concept of discipline forbears one's desire to rationalize his faltering and he will subjugate to the commitment he has made to discipline. For just as discipline denotes all the previously mentioned contexts, it also manifests an idea of strength and strong-willedness, empowering him to be just as he thinks. Once again, drawing us back into a impenetrable foke.
An aggressive, active, inexorable application of the concept of discipline. Passivity has ruled long enough in my book and it has no place in the way of warrior. A proclivity towards cutting oneself slack, as it pertains to the discipline of discipline, has no place when one sets forth creating their own, unique idea of Destrucity.
Seeing the world literally strengthens your commitment and stiffens the actuality of your resolve. Rampant repetitiveness of avowed dogma, and it's inherent dogmatic principles are futile, and certainly no guarantee of any success beyond the fabulous daydreaming you accomplish.
To become -- ACT AS IF. Any principle one chooses to adopt, and consequently emulate, must be suffused with the causality of discipline.