View Single Post
  #35  
Old 02-10-2010, 05:00 AM
Boo.

Nolan or not, I totally agree with the sentiment that Superman is just not that interesting a superhero. He might have worked in WWII-era United States, but nowadays, audiences are looking for a lot more depth in their superheroes, not some invincible guy who can fly around, do anything and has only ONE weakness. I don't even think there is any way of making a more "gritty and realistic" version of Superman without taking away everything that identifies him as a superhero, including the bright tights, and so, although adamjohnson is in the right direction, I think that they should just give up on the Superman franchise and focus on the more interesting superheroes.
Reply With Quote