Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Sorry I can understand her getting 50% of what he has made during the marriage. She was with him from the bottom, so it's only fair.
The part I have a problem with is the 50% of future earnings. How does that work? Is this the most expensive alimony plan ever? I don't condone anything that the man has done in the past, but to take half of what he earns after the divorce is wrong. Two wrongs don't make a right, and this is fucking bullshite in my opinion.
This is exactly my point from the get go. I am glad that I am not the only one who sees this. And yes, it's absolute shite.