Originally Posted by The Postmaster General
I know what the thread is about but you explicitly evoked Twinkie lovers to focus on unions. No doubt you are talking about right to work states but it is very obvious you were pandering to the group of people bummed out about snack cakes. Otherwise you would have just used Twinkies as an example instead of singling out Twinkie lovers (e.g., people who want to eat twinkles) , for the sake of focusing the loss of their brand, against unions (people who stand up for what they think is right.)
It's no big deal. I don't think you really think eating Twinkies is more important than standing up for rights. I'm sorry if you don't see how it's just kind of funny that you were addressing Twinkie lovers, as it appeared as if you expected them to hold Twinkies to higher regard than people in unions. Some people really do think that way so I think it's worth highlighting, even if only as a passing thought, which was all that was. I was being sincere when I said it was my favorite part.
Only obvious to you and your negative thinking. I suggest you re read what I wrote and focus on the theme and not the example. I gave the Twinkie example, because it is the most recent example. I think you are reading too much into what I said. I think you know me well enough that I do not imply anything. I come right out and say what is on my mind. Your second paragraph is really funny. Seriously, it was just a recent example.
Twinkies aside, do you have anything to add in the form of substance on the real topic at hand or would you rather discuss sno balls (Con Air), zingers, wonder bread, Ding Dongs or HoHos?
And my personal fav and if you don't laugh at this, you are dead inside