#1  
Old 07-12-2012, 03:58 PM
Paul Thomas Anderson vs. Quentin Tarantino

Two great friends and in my opinion the only two writer/directors talented enough to be compared to each other...

I've been on a huge PTA kick recently - and I've been on a QT kick for about eight years. Although these two guys are of course completely different and blazingly original talents, all of their features show two filmmakers steeped deeply in knowledge of cinema history.

I could never choose between my two favorite filmmakers of all time, but perhaps The Master (my most anticipated film of the year) vs. Django Unchained (#2) later this year will shed some light on this incredibly sticky subject.

Let the discussion of two geniuses begin.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:18 PM
Funnily enough, these two are best friends.

I personally think Tarantino is the more talented of the two, but I think Anderson has been making better films overall (although nothing he's made is as good as Pulp Fiction). Anderson's films are a little more ambitious, thought-provoking and character driven than Tarantino's recent efforts, so I give him the edge. Either way though, they are 1 and 2 when it comes to the best filmmakers under 50.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2012, 06:37 PM
QT by default. I have only seen there will be blood by PTA that is one of the greatest dramas of all time. I enjoy most of QT filmwork.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2012, 06:41 PM
PTA by far for me. He's made two films in my top 20 favourite movies with Magnolia and Boogie Nights. QT hasn't made anything near as impressive or memorable as those two films.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2012, 11:29 PM
Right now...it's Tarantino.

Although when all is said and done, I have a feeling it could be Anderson. I can only go off "There Will Be Blood" and the two (phenomenal) trailers for "The Master", but PTA seems to be entering a new stage in his career - one where he can proudly where the label "modern master" or "one of the best".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-13-2012, 12:34 AM
1.) Pulp Fiction -10/10
2.) Magnolia -10/10
3.) There Will Be Blood -10/10
4.) Jackie Brown -10/10
5.) Boogie Nights -9/10
6.) Kill Bill: Volume 1 -9/10
7.) Reservoir Dogs -8/10
8.) Kill Bill: Volume 2 -8/10
9.) Hard Eight -8/10
10.) Inglourious Basterds -7.5/10
11.) Punch Drunk Love -6/10
12.) Death Proof -6/10

Pulp Fiction is better than anything PT's made, but Magnolia and There Will Be Blood are not far behind and are leagues better than anything else QT's made since Jackie Brown 15 years ago. I think Anderson has now proven himself the more talented director and where QT may have once had the edge as the best working screenwriter, his last several scripts have had a lot of problems, especially with the dialogue that was their signature.

Ultimately it goes to Anderson because Tarantino's last 4 and next movie have all been variations on the same movie - revenge genre pic steeped in 70s exploitation homage - itself a variation on other movies, and Anderson has shown incredible ambition and success at making wildly different pictures that are still very much his own. Anderson has and continues to grow while Tarantino remains stunted and may even be devolving.

Last edited by QUENTIN; 07-15-2012 at 03:50 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-14-2012, 11:10 PM
like comparing an apple to an orange
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-15-2012, 08:36 PM
Quentin > PTA

I don't understand the hate towards Death Proof, I thought it was underrated.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2012, 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jig Saw 123 View Post
Quentin > PTA

I don't understand the hate towards Death Proof, I thought it was underrated.
Same here..I didn't care for it the first time I saw it but I really enjoyed it the 2nd time around..I actually prefer this over Planet Terror
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jig Saw 123 View Post
I don't understand the hate towards Death Proof, I thought it was underrated.
It was overwritten with too much dialogue being it's main downfall. It would have faired better as a short film. That and the action sequences are too far and in between. I was disappointed with Kurt Russell turning into a vagina when the shits flipped on him rather than sticking to his guns with the car maniac gimmick.

Not a Tarantino fan so PT by far. I didn't see the genuis behind Hard Eight and I thought Punch Drunk Love was horrible. His movies are pretty solid though other than that.

Last edited by SL Dubbs; 07-18-2012 at 06:43 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-19-2012, 04:27 PM
PTA's gotten better with every film he's made. Even though I wish he made films more frequently, I'm glad each offering is so incredibly well done.

There Will Be Blood- 10/10
Pulp Fiction- 9.5/10
Boogie Nights- 9.5/10
Punch Drunk Love- 9.5/10
Magnolia- 9/10
Reservoir Dogs- 9/10
Death Proof- 8.5/10
The Master- 8.5/10
Django Unchained- 8.5/10
Hard Eight- 8.5/10
Inglorious Basterds- 8.5/10
Jackie Brown- 8/10
Kill Bill Volume 1- 7/10
Kill Bill Volume 2- 7/10

Last edited by Kevin Smith fan; 01-04-2013 at 03:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-17-2012, 02:57 PM
PTA slight edge over Quentin.

Without a doubt, the best two directors of our time (with a nod to Martin Scorsese & Clint Eastwood...although they're both past their prime).
Kubrick is still the best of all time in my eyes but PTA and Quentin aren't far behind now.
I also have to give a nod to Christopher Nolan for being the best "blockbuster-type" director now.

Here's my list from the movies I've seen by them.

PTA

1. There Will Be Blood
2. Punch-Drunk Love
3. Magnolia
4. Hard Eight
5. Boogie Nights

Tarantino

1. Pulp Fiction
2. Inglorious Basterds
3. (tie) Kill Bill #1 / Kill Bill #2
5. Jackie Brown
6. Reservoir Dogs

Last edited by lenbrick; 07-17-2012 at 03:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:18 PM
speaking of Magnolia being a mess(I actually liked it a lot) at the beginning does pt anderson really believe those urban legends are true? it seems like he is saying that weird things happen in life but none of those things he mentions actually happened. can anyone clarify this?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-10-2012, 05:07 AM
PT by a nose.

Both are very talented but PT hasnt made a bad film imo while Tarantino made Death Proof(just an awful film all around) so PT gets the edge.

Last edited by echo_bravo; 10-31-2012 at 09:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-17-2012, 09:47 PM
I'm with echo. Both are by far my top two filmmakers who started working after I was born, but I'm not sure which one I would pick if I had to so I'll leave it until the end of the year to decide.

Must say that with both of these geniuses releasing new movies, a new Daniel Day-Lewis performance and a new Bond, this is the most excited I've been for end of the year film in a while.

Spoiler:
and Killing Them Softly!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-22-2012, 08:13 AM
Hey guys! Now let's discuss who the best painter is!! Rembrandt vs. Bellows?!?! How about music? Cohen vs. Brahms?!?! Who's winning???!?!?!?
What the fuck? Can anyone here appreciate art without reducing it to a numerical death match? No wonder the rest of the civilized world thinks we are pompous, mouth-breathing idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-22-2012, 10:02 AM
I would have to say Quentin Tarantino by default since the only experience I have with Paul Thomas Anderson is the bits of Punch-Drunk Love I've seen. I wasn't in love with it, but it was good. The Master is a film I'm really anticipating, so I'll try to get in as much of his filmography as I can before that movie comes out, starting with Boogie Nights and There Will Be Blood which seem to be revered as his best works.

Quote:
Originally Posted by swindle1977 View Post
Hey guys! Now let's discuss who the best painter is!! Rembrandt vs. Bellows?!?! How about music? Cohen vs. Brahms?!?! Who's winning???!?!?!?
What the fuck? Can anyone here appreciate art without reducing it to a numerical death match? No wonder the rest of the civilized world thinks we are pompous, mouth-breathing idiots.
Um . . . we CAN discuss who the best painter is or who the best musician is. It's not a numerical death match, we're just explaining whose brand of art we prefer and why.

Who is "we" when you call us "mouth-breathing idiots"? Movie fans? I've never heard of that stereotype. You may breathe through your nose just fine, but you're kind of the biggest idiot here. We're trying to have an intelligent discussion, but I suppose you're against that because it's too difficult for you to keep up.

Last edited by magjournal; 08-22-2012 at 05:33 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-22-2012, 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swindle1977 View Post
Hey guys! Now let's discuss who the best painter is!! Rembrandt vs. Bellows?!?! How about music? Cohen vs. Brahms?!?! Who's winning???!?!?!?
What the fuck? Can anyone here appreciate art without reducing it to a numerical death match? No wonder the rest of the civilized world thinks we are pompous, mouth-breathing idiots.
Art and numerical death matches go hand-in-hand. You can't have one without the other. So, with that being said...

Bellows and Cohen.

Last edited by blankpage; 08-22-2012 at 08:15 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-22-2012, 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swindle1977 View Post
Hey guys! Now let's discuss who the best painter is!! Rembrandt vs. Bellows?!?! How about music? Cohen vs. Brahms?!?! Who's winning???!?!?!?
What the fuck? Can anyone here appreciate art without reducing it to a numerical death match? No wonder the rest of the civilized world thinks we are pompous, mouth-breathing idiots.

Sounds like someone needs a timeout? Did you have a bad day at school sweetie? You need a nap? Mommy come rub your tummy and make you feel better?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-22-2012, 09:00 PM
I really like both but PTA takes this hand down. IMO, he is the best working right now. There Will Be Blood and Boogie Nights are both exceptional films, easily top 5 of the past 20 years (There Will Be Blood is the best of the past 20-30 years and in my top 5 of all time). Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, and Bastards are all very good films but not in the same league as There Will Be Blood and Boogie Nights. IMO Fincher is closer to PTA but still not quite as good.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-16-2012, 01:51 AM
1.Pulp Fiction 10/10

2.Reservoir Dogs 10/10

3.Boogie Nights 10/10

4.Inglorious Basterds 10/10

5.Kill Bill Vol 1&2 9/10

6.Magnolia 9/10

7.Jackie Brown 9/10

8.There Will Be Blood 9/10

9.Hard Eight 8/10

10.The Master 8/10

11.Death Proof 7/10

12.Punch-Drunk 7.5/10
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-31-2012, 12:25 PM
Tarantino, shamefully haven't seen enough of PTA's work to make an accurate comparison though...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-03-2012, 07:57 AM
QT

Reservoir Dogs 10/10
Pulp Fiction 10/10
Jackie Brown 10/10
Kill Bill Vol.1 10/10
Kill Bill Vol.2 8/10
Death Proof 7/10
Ingloriuos Basterds 10/10
Django Unchained N/A (Looks fuckin' amazing)

VS.

PTA

Hard Eight 7/10
Boogie Nights 10/10
Magnolia 8/10
Punch-Drunk Love 7/10
There Will Be Blood 10/10
The Master 6/10


QT very easy.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-03-2012, 08:51 PM
Quentin all day long over PTA. However There Will Be Blood & Boogie Nights are great fucking films.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump