#1  
Old 11-05-2009, 11:31 AM
Go away, Robert Zemeckis

Come back to REAL movies, or go away forever.

You're embarrassing yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-2009, 12:05 PM
I'm tired of his animation movies.

Did not bother with Beowulf. It looked cartoony in my opinion.

I really hope he gives us another Back To The Future or Cast Away.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2009, 02:06 PM
Go away, Paul Greengrass
your shaky cam makes the film laughable.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2009, 02:44 PM
Robert Zemeckis is a pioneer and history will reflect that.

History will also reflect that he never made a movie that I thought was better than average.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2009, 02:50 PM
Zemeckis is awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2009, 03:14 PM
Both Polar Express and Beowulf made me think Boy this would be great if it were live action. His Christmas Carole looks no different, and I had no reason to expect it to. The plus of it all is that he's trying something new. The negative is that he isn't doing it in an effective way for audience members like me, and the real downer is how little he appears to be changing his approach in the span between movies. I guess whatever technique he has been refining doesn't interest me. Too ahead of its time, or that time's technology?

At least other directors are using the technology for more engaging uses. Avatar is my hopeful example.

Last edited by Shinigami; 11-05-2009 at 03:19 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2009, 03:34 PM
The man was a genius when he made actual movies like Back to the Future and Contact. This recent series of creepy, soulless animation films he's been churning out are just terrible in every way.

You want to remake Yellow Submarine in 3D performance capture? Really? Have you lost it, man? Go boil your fucking head.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2009, 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinigami View Post
Both Polar Express and Beowulf made me think Boy this would be great if it were live action. His Christmas Carole looks no different, and I had no reason to expect it to. The plus of it all is that he's trying something new. The negative is that he isn't doing it in an effective way for audience members like me, and the real downer is how little he appears to be changing his approach in the span between movies. I guess whatever technique he has been refining doesn't interest me. Too ahead of its time, or that time's technology?

At least other directors are using the technology for more engaging uses. Avatar is my hopeful example.
Avatar is a completely different technology.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-05-2009, 04:00 PM
I was under the impression Cameron used similar mocap technology on Pandora with the Navi. If he didn't I have no point. If he did, my point is that his usage feels more immediately-engrossing to me than Christmas Carole.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:10 PM
Beowulf kicks all kinds of ass. Enough said.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:17 PM
Oh, Robert Zemeckis. How do I love thee? Let me count the ways:

Back to the Future (all 3, but especially the first)
Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
Forrest Gump - masterpiece (10/10)
Contact - masterpiece (10/10)
Cast Away - near masterpiece (9/10)

What happened to you? I lament my love, lost, for thee. Because now you've confined yourself to churning out the same lifeless crap - and you just won't STOP. Will you EVER make a live action movie again? Or is there no turning back by this point?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-05-2009, 07:40 PM
He doesn't owe us anything. If this is how he wants to make movies, who are we to tell him differently?

Now maybe if people stopped going to see these performance capture movies, the studios wouldn't give him money and he'd have to go back to live action. But just cause he's not making the kind of movies you like doesn't mean you have to get mad at the guy.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-07-2009, 07:04 AM
I very much enjoyed The Polar Express, and Beowulf was one of my favorite films of '07.

But I agree, Zemeckis should make a return to live action. Do I want to ban him from ever making a mocap film again? Of course not, but it seems as if now that he's set out down that road, he thinks he can never turn back, that he's stuck making these kinds of movies from now on.

It's the same case with George Lucas. The man did THX and American Graffiti, so you know he can make something that's not Star Wars, but he's proven to be perfectly content letting his creativity go to waste on one single property.

I'm sure A Christmas Carol will be a solid film, but I'd much rather see Zemeckis wow me with something that costs less than $100 million. I know he can do it, and his fans know he can do it, but the question now is if he knows he can.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-07-2009, 11:56 AM
Imo The Polar Express was fucking brilliant. A perfect Christmas film, and one of my favs.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2009, 12:45 PM
I love The Polar Express--I watch it every December. I'll most likely place his A Christmas Carol next to The Muppet Christmas Carol after it hits DVD. Sure, I would like him to make a live action film or two in between his mo-cap films, but I can't complain as his mo-cap films thus far haven't been too shabby. Beowulf has alright.

Whatever Zemeckis does in the future is alright by me.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-09-2009, 09:49 PM
The guy has earned the right to do whatever he wants in my mind, sure if i had a vote in it i'd probably have him make another live action movie but i have no problem with him doing whatever he feels like.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:47 PM
He's in a phase, just like Cameron was in the underwater doc phase. I hope people realize this.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:53 PM
I'd like to see him do some live action films in between his performance capture stuff but if he's doing what he wants to do that's cool with me. I havent hated either one of his performance captures Ive seen (I havent Christmas Carol yet). So far his motion captures have been pretty successful so I really don't see why he should stop.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:19 AM
How long has it been since the talk of a Forest Gump sequel? I wouldn't mind even if it was animation.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-12-2009, 02:35 PM

He might be doing The Nutcracker next. Mother of God
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-12-2009, 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digifruitella View Post
He's in a phase, just like Cameron was in the underwater doc phase. I hope people realize this.
Puberty is a phase too, and this is lasting longer than that.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-12-2009, 08:24 PM
Some last longer then. Some people don't grow facial hair even when they hit 20's.

Plus he can do whatever he wants, he earned the right anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-12-2009, 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digifruitella View Post
Some last longer then. Some people don't grow facial hair even when they hit 20's.

Plus he can do whatever he wants, he earned the right anyway.
yeah, I like how he is sacrificing artistic integrity to make self indulgent crap.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-13-2009, 01:59 AM
unfortunate indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-13-2009, 02:53 AM
I liked The Polar Express a lot and Beowulf was pretty cool. And I'm very much looking forward to A Christmas Carol.

That said, I wish he'd FINALLY do a friggin' live action movie again!

If he is going to do Roger Rabbit 2 then actually I would very much look forward to that. I just hope he keeps it a mix of live action and animation. And the animation be in the same style as the first one and not what he's been doing for the past several years.

But I definitely don't want him going away. He's always been, still is and always will be one of my favorite directors.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-13-2009, 03:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by echo_bravo View Post
He might be doing The Nutcracker next. Mother of God
Really?! Hell, if he wants to keep doing stop-motion, fine by me. However, do a work that hasn't been done to death already. I still don't get how he thinks I'm going to go see A Christmas Carol again. No hefty amount of unique visuals and 3D gimmicks is gonna drag me to cinemas to see a story I have seen done countless times before.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-13-2009, 05:06 AM
I love how we are allways screaming for filmmakers to do projects from their heart and not for the cash. Robert Zemekis does this exact thing, and gets rifled for it. Give me a break people, He has earned the right to make whatever the fuck he want's....even if he was making a stop motion animation porn movie with Randy Quaid and Amy Winehouse. If your don't like the mo-cap, don't watch. Just don't act like a baby who spat the dummy out.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-13-2009, 07:53 AM
I'm pretty sure, and I may be crazy for thinking this but I have a feeling, Hyde, that you paying to see another Christmas Carol would be the last thought on his mind. In fact, I'd imagine the only people on his mind would be parents and their children who, most likely, haven't seen a version of the Christmas Carol yet and if they have, don't necessarily have one to call their own.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-13-2009, 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSimen View Post
I'm pretty sure, and I may be crazy for thinking this but I have a feeling, Hyde, that you paying to see another Christmas Carol would be the last thought on his mind. In fact, I'd imagine the only people on his mind would be parents and their children who, most likely, haven't seen a version of the Christmas Carol yet and if they have, don't necessarily have one to call their own.
I'm pretty aware of that Simen, thank you. The point of the rant is that I would like to see a story that hasn't been done before with the stop-motion. I never saw The Polar Express, but Beowulf was pretty entertaining (8/10). I know that he's introducing A Christmas Story to a new generation, I was just throwing my useless frustrated opinion on why I wouldn't see the movie. Maybe he can find another Christmas story to adapt with the stop motion, rather something that has been tread to the ground.

Last edited by Mr.HyDe807; 11-13-2009 at 11:46 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-13-2009, 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
He has earned the right to make whatever the fuck he want's....even if he was making a stop motion animation porn movie with Randy Quaid and Amy Winehouse. .
Now now, lets not give Zemeckis any ideas.

Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-16-2009, 03:04 PM
I didn't think the hack was still making movies!!!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-16-2009, 04:07 PM
I can understand not caring for a lot of his movies, but I don't understand how anyone can call the man who gave us Back to the Future, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Forrest Gump, Contact and Cast Away a hack. And that's even if you don't like the motion capture flicks he's been working on ever since The Polar Express.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-16-2009, 04:29 PM
The guy has made Three mo-cap movies, THREE.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-16-2009, 08:35 PM
I want just as much as anyone for Zemeckis to get back to traditional live action stuff, but I'm still going to defend him here.

Haven't seen The Polar Express, but I thought Beowulf was pretty good. I'll also wait till I've seen A Christmas Carol to pass judgment. Zemeckis has been on the forefront of moviemaking technology since his early career, and I think he's gotten too caught up in all this technical wizardry. However I can still appreciate that he's trying to move the medium in a direction further than it's ever been before.

I also hope to God his next project is live action though. Zemeckis really excels with a great story.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:38 AM
besides the creepy looking characters, the thing that bothered me most about Polar Express was the damn kid on the train's voice. No kid has ever talked like that in the history of the world.

coulda been an amazing movie too. Beowulf wasnt bad, but his mo-cap style blows.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-17-2009, 04:28 PM
Why make a live action movie when you can plunk down 100 million dollars so Jim Carrey can fly AT YOU in 3D!!!?!?!?!?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:11 PM
Just saw Disney's A Christmas Carol today and it completely sucked. Please, Zemeckis, go back to making live action movies! I beg you!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.