|
|||||||
| MOVIE FAN CENTRAL | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
sequels.... don't we just love them
Well here comes another.... and guess what, there is no Ashton Kutcher. OK the guy is a dick at times but come on.... According to Variety, FilmEngine has approved a pitch for a sequel to the 2004 New Line hit that studio plans to distribute as a negative pickup of a sequel to The Butterfly Effect.The pic will have all new characters, meaning original's star, Ashton Kutcher, isn't expected to be involved. Veteran D.P. John Leonetti, who directed Mortal Kombat: Annihilation has been tapped to helm from a script being written by Michael Weiss.The story will follow a new character who, like Kutcher in the first, finds he can travel through time. As he changes past events, though, they have unexpected consequences in the present.The pic is on a fast track, with casting set to start as soon as a script is delivered. Producers hope to start shooting by the fall. Well, it could be worth watching....... GIVE YOUR VERDICT!!!!! ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The original wasn't even very good, I doubt this will be good at all.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
i bet they'll turn this into the next final destination, the first was pretty cool, but really just a pointless and unneeded sequel, i wonder what movies would be like is studio execs like movies more than money, i mean i know its a business and there in it to make money but we just need to ship 3 or 4 schmoe to each studio to let them know what to do
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...I liked TBE, but a sequel?
Anytime I thought about this movie, the word sequel never popped in my head. It's like The Others, and Natural Born Killers, YOU JUST DON'T NEED A SEQUEL! Sure, you never need a sequel (Excluding franchises), but sometimes making sequels makes sense (To producers), but this is way out there... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
i enjoyed TBE despite it was completely stupid, but i doubt id bother seeing a sequel, it really doesnt need it
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The sly stupidity of the first film worked due to the inept Ashton Kutcher's comical performance...or was it comical? Funniest movie I saw in '04. No need for a sequel if Ashton isn't there to fuck it up.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Butterfly Effect 2
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought the first one great. Very original. Am I the only one who liked Kutcher's performance. It was one of those movies I didn't want to end. But a sequel? Come on. It's just gonna be the same old storyline from the first one with different people. IT WILL NOT WORK!
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
the first one is really great, but this is just another pointless sequel.... *sigh*
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really liked 'The Butterfly Effect' but there's really no point in a sequel. I hate how studios will sometimes just make stupid sequels just for the sake of making them.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was one of my favorite films of 2004, but I don't think it deserves a sequel.
![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I really like the IDEA of the Butterfly Effect and there's more to be shown. There is so many ways you can make a time travel movie work.
And again, my main problem with the first film was ASHTON KUTCHER! THANK GOD he's not involved in this. There's hope for the movie, I do have faith in it. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I loved BE but unless they went on a totally completely different route (and I mean totally completely different) it's going to reek like hell.
I WON'T ALLOW IT! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Butterfly Effect was a great movie, everyone who says otherwise has their head up their ass, and is lookin for way too much in movies.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|