#1  
Old 06-15-2012, 03:37 AM
The most ridicluous IMDB list ever

http://www.imdb.com/list/sMe7cCDj4cw/
It is a list of celebrities that people say are attractive but are not. When I saw Rachael McAdams pop up on the list I questioned the list. The majority of the list was filled with attractive to beautiful women. Everyone's taste is different but really? What is with IMDB members?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-15-2012, 06:41 AM
Haha. I've come across that list. Small world wide web.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2012, 01:26 AM
How is Rachel McAdams NOT hot?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2012, 05:45 AM
I raged my way down to number 95 on that list before giving up. I agree with maybe two of them (Uma Therman and Sarah Jessica Parker). The rest ranged from objectively attractive people to some who I thought were gorgeous. It's really a matter of taste, but this shows how superficial and judgmental some people are. Now, if they put the fat version of Jonah Hill on the list...nothin' against the guy, but at least there's some warrant there.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:10 AM
I think the guy had to have done this to work people up for laughs. If you look at his other lists he had this one...

The most attractive female celebrities/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2012, 10:07 AM
Some of those women genuinely are not attractive, like Sarah Jessica Parker and Tori Spelling. Uma Thurman is sometimes really hot (like as Mia Wallace), sometimes not at all.

But yeah, obviously this list is a joke.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2012, 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damone View Post
I think the guy had to have done this to work people up for laughs. If you look at his other lists he had this one...

The most attractive female celebrities/
Wow only a few people on that list are attractive and he listed Lindsay Lohan at least 15 times!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2012, 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by magjournal View Post
Some of those women genuinely are not attractive, like Sarah Jessica Parker and Tori Spelling. Uma Thurman is sometimes really hot (like as Mia Wallace), sometimes not at all.

But yeah, obviously this list is a joke.
I agree with that (especially Sarah Jessica Parker).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-19-2012, 02:48 PM
I think the thing that amazes me most about that list is that someone had the time to just sit around and add over 1,000 actress pages to it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-19-2012, 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flimmaker1473 View Post
I agree with that (especially Sarah Jessica Parker).


Agreed.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-20-2012, 04:27 PM
Lol, yeah I've bumped into that list several times. I think it could be someone just trolling while throwing in a few celebs in there that fit the description to fuck with people.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damone View Post
I think the guy had to have done this to work people up for laughs. If you look at his other lists he had this one...

The most attractive female celebrities/
Probably one of the worst attempts at humor since Kung Pow
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-21-2012, 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaw2929 View Post
How is Rachel McAdams NOT hot?
When she stands next too about 1000 other hot chicks in Hollywood today
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erroneous View Post
When she stands next too about 1000 other hot chicks in Hollywood today
When looked at from that perspective, she is pretty reggie lookin
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-22-2012, 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digifruitella View Post
When looked at from that perspective, she is pretty reggie lookin
"Reggie lookin"?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-22-2012, 03:44 PM
reggie = regular
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-23-2012, 01:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digifruitella View Post
reggie = regular


Hmm. I don't get it, but if you say so....
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-23-2012, 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaw2929 View Post

Hmm. I don't get it, but if you say so....
Again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erroneous View Post
When she stands next too about 1000 other hot chicks in Hollywood today
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digifruitella View Post
When looked at from that perspective, she is pretty reggie lookin
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-23-2012, 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erroneous View Post
When she stands next too about 1000 other hot chicks in Hollywood today





I think she can hold her own among 1000 women in Hollywood.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-24-2012, 12:40 AM
Thanks Filmmaker. I agree, she's very attractive and totally NOT 'regular looking'.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-24-2012, 02:52 AM
she's reggie looking against a 1000 hot actresses. Hold her own, that's all, not against the hotter ones though. I think that was Erroneous' main point. She's pretty to me yeah, but isn't the point we're making. I'm just supporting him in that thought.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-24-2012, 10:47 PM
I disagree with your general statement Digi.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-25-2012, 05:59 PM
I find her cute, like I mentioned earlier. Don't get me wrong. We're discussing a perspective which Erroneous has brought up.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-25-2012, 11:06 PM
I think Erroneous is more than capable of fighting is own little battles.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-16-2012, 02:57 PM
This reminds me of another dumb list of the "worst directors". It even had some stupid elitist crap which basically said that if you disagree, you are automatically a "fanboy". I posted the link on Gamefaqs and the funny part was one of the idiot film snobs who automatically agreed with it had a username that suggested that he is a fan of one of the director's listed. How dumb can you be?

It's like, "He's talking about YOU, stupid. You're the idiot fanboy!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-19-2012, 02:13 PM

All those IMDB lists are stupid, if it has more than 10 entries why bother. I cringe when I see titles like:
The best movies ever, a list of 2,081 titles by...
or
A select group of actors I like, a list of 1,743 people by....

What's the point of those lists if you put every film or every actor in it?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump