Their is an interesting article over at SlashFilm in regards to the digital stripping of Jessica Alba in MACHETE. I was unaware of the fact that during her nude shower scene (which was from a obscured angle) she actually wasn't nude at all. The effect was done using the magic of CGI. Now my theory is that director Robert Rodriguez caught a lot of flak for casting Alba as the only stripper in SIN CITY who never strips (or at least attempting to get her tipsy on the day of the shoot). In real life that movie would've ended when the patrons rioted for not getting what they paid for (I've seen worse happen at $2 Tuesday nights). So to atone for his sins, he turned to his computer to have Jessica play ball for MACHETE. The results were convincing, but did we just open Pandora's box? We are a generation raised on CGI at the theaters, as well as during countless exposition moments in video games cutscenes. Is CGI nudity a natural progression of the art, or does it cheapen something in it's use?
These are questions left to wiser, more sober minds, so please feel free to discuss amongst yourselves. I've included a picture of the before/after CGI stripping below.










CGi
I can respect if an actress
WELL...
I still get a little ticked off when Alba goes on interviews and makes up these round about excuses about integrity and not doing nudity and sort of getting on a soap box about what she will and will not do-- sometimes people should just say "I just dont wanna" --Im cool with that and makes more sense to me than talking in circles about how you were raised religiously or some other high minded excuse to just turn around and have a nude scene anyway, just with the use of CG and then turn around and act like you werent part of it-- that somehow you arent to blame since somebody ELSE digitally took your clothes off.
Well, that was disappointing.
Sidelick