Too close to call between Kristen Bell and Krysten Ritter in last week's Face Off. I sympathize with your split there. They've each got their strengths and weaknesses, which makes them more of an individual choice, rather than a clear cut thing.
I've been seeing a lot of commercials for that movie DIVERGENT around the old boob tube. I still don't quite understand what it's about and I'm apparently too lazy to investigate further. I've seen enough to know that it stars the lovely Shailene Woodley. She seems like a good choice for one half of a Face Off, but I had to rack my brain to think of someone to compare to her. Then I caught an episode from the newest season of American Horror Story, featuring the also lovely Emma Roberts. Hmmm, that works. They're the same age after all, with the same kind of look about them and with similar careers. Now it's up to you to decide which of these two young hotties is your thing. Do share with the group below.
Shailene's a little different from the crowd beauty wise. I don't know what it is about her, but it seems to me like she's got her own thing happening. She's not run-of-the-mill, but that's not a bad thing. She's still very much a cutie pie, just in her own way. I like that a lot. It's a refreshing thing amidst a sea of interchangeables.
I don't see much of a difference between these two girls as far as bodies go. They're both pretty much of the same general physique, which is firmly in the petite zone. I was tempted for a second to give a no vote to this one, as such bodies don't do as much for me. Then again, it's not a crime to be something other than what I might prefer. No reason to negate them completely. Besides, they're not sickly-looking or anything. So I give them a tie vote instead.
I wont deny that Shailene is a great bikini-wearer. She proved that more than once in THE DESCENDANTS. The fact that she looks 15 when she wears bikinis and walks and talks and does everything else is weird sometimes, despite the fact that she's 23. Looking way younger than her years no doubt gives her plenty of opportunities for work, but that's not where I tend to look for hotness.
In step with Shailene, I will acknowledge that Emma looks good in her underwear. However, the word "cute" keeps popping up in my mind as far as these two go. They have loads of cute, but it's a struggle for me to get to hot from cute. A couple more gigs where they're not playing adolescents should help out there.
Looks like they're eyeing that HUNGER GAMES cash with this DIVERGENT movie, which is the first in a trilogy of films based on books by author Veronica Roth, also dealing with events happening in the life of a young girl in a dystopian future. I like Shailene as an actress. She's got good range and she can hold her own with an equally talented cast. It remains to be seen if her latest projects have legs to stand toe-to-toe with that other trilogy. They are giving Shailene a pretty good shot in the arm as far as career goes.
Emma doesn't have a trilogy yet. I might have once thought that was justified, as she never impressed me much before AHS, where she plays the Lohan-esque character fairly convincingly. She seems to be good at playing bitches or emotionally challenged people. I wont speculate on what that says about her as a person, if anything at all. Suffice it to say that her performances tend to be hit and miss for me.
Career advantages give Shailene my vote, but apart from that this was a tough one for me to call. Obviously these are both attractive girls, but I'm not drawn to them like I am some others. Perhaps, with little more time, that could change. We'll see.