Latest Movie Hotties Headlines

Photoshop Megan Fox is mysterious for Armani

Jul. 6, 2011by: Droz
100%

You'd think that when these magazines or whatever reach a point in their retouching that the person they're messing with no longer looks like themselves, the people in charge would realize that perhaps they've gone too far. Apparently not, though, if these ads featuring Megan Fox are any indication of what those responsible were thinking. Actually, once you reach this point of retouching, you don't really even need to pay the model anything anymore. There's literally more retouch than original image left.

The really stupid part is that it's so obvious what they've done. There's no doubting that what you're seeing is completely fake. It's a pointless digital fantasy created in a computer. To put this out there as some standard for beauty for people to meet would be like idiots who wanted to believe the shit in AVATAR was real. We all thought those people were idiots, but somehow Photoshopping Megan Fox into a digital fantasy for people to try to emulate is okay. Stupid.

Click on each photo to enlarge!

Source: Superior Pics
Tags: megan fox

Related Articles

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Drool Back
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

1:18PM on 07/07/2011

Bangable but .....

never should have f**ked with her mouth. Lips looked hot b4 the surgery.
never should have f**ked with her mouth. Lips looked hot b4 the surgery.
Your Reply:



+0
9:31AM on 07/07/2011

FOXY LADY

RETOUCHED ?? YEAH . The only puzzling part is why . MEGAN FOX IS A NATURALLY GORGEOUS WOMAN , and these shots would likely benefit from displaying that natural beauty . That being said , GREAT PICS !! HOTT !!
RETOUCHED ?? YEAH . The only puzzling part is why . MEGAN FOX IS A NATURALLY GORGEOUS WOMAN , and these shots would likely benefit from displaying that natural beauty . That being said , GREAT PICS !! HOTT !!
Your Reply:



+7
6:49PM on 07/06/2011
oh no, another one who doesn't get what commercial photography is about.
"created in the computer".. jesus, wtf.
did you look at the photos?
it's megan fox. she looks like megan fox.
just because some imperfections on the skin or stuff like that is removed doesn't mean, it's not the model anymore.
anyway, great shots.

ps: people writing useless stuff like that probably are the same ones who complain when a movie isn't about "reality". that's what magazine photos are for. if you want
oh no, another one who doesn't get what commercial photography is about.
"created in the computer".. jesus, wtf.
did you look at the photos?
it's megan fox. she looks like megan fox.
just because some imperfections on the skin or stuff like that is removed doesn't mean, it's not the model anymore.
anyway, great shots.

ps: people writing useless stuff like that probably are the same ones who complain when a movie isn't about "reality". that's what magazine photos are for. if you want "real", go outside and look around you.
Your Reply:



5:22PM on 07/06/2011
Wait, the people that believe in Pandora are idiots but the people that think this level of beauty is attainable aren't?

It's a perfectly passable piece of commercial photography designed to sell overpriced but fashionable clothes to people that don't need em.
Wait, the people that believe in Pandora are idiots but the people that think this level of beauty is attainable aren't?

It's a perfectly passable piece of commercial photography designed to sell overpriced but fashionable clothes to people that don't need em.
Your Reply:



Boobies Of The Day

More
Incredible Kat

Hottie Of The Week

More
Transcendent Hottie

Latest Pictures

More
rosamund-pike rosamund-pike rosamund-pike