Latest Horror Movie Headlines

Cool Horror Videos: Behind-the-scenes puppet work on The Thing (2011)

Jan. 3, 2013by: Eric Walkuski
100%

Universal's "premake" of THE THING landed with a thud in 2011, a deserving fate for an unremarkable and largely unnecessary movie that fans of the original didn't want and new audiences didn't care about. Arguably the film's most nagging aspect is its reliance on cheesy computer-generated effects; you find yourself wondering during some of the shoddy sequences, "How did anyone allow this to make the final cut?"

Making this even more irksome is the fact that, while I was visiting the set of the film, it was made clear that there would be an ample helping of practical effects. I had the pleasure of watching FX maestros Tom Woodruff and Alec Gillis work their magic with some creepy creature puppets - almost all of which never made it into the final film, of course.

If you're interested in what could have been, today brings us a behind-the-scenes video, courtesy of Amalgamated Dynamic Inc., of one of the "pilots" being controlled by the Thing. (I did not see these fellows while on set, unfortunately.) Before watching, read what ADI has to say about their work.

The plan was that there would be 3 versions of the Pilot in THE THING (2011). Here are two: the mummified Pilot, and the Thing having replicated itself as one of the alien crew members. In the story originally, the Thing needed to become one of these aliens in order to fly the ship buried under the ice. (Note the bio-mechanical connections implanted in the creature's back.) ADI designed the character, built a limited animatronic puppet, and performed it on set.

The third Pilot was going to be a digital version of this creature, but due to a story change, it was never executed. The mummified Pilot was covered over with a digital energy effect, and we designed a new character, the Sanders-Thing, which was realized digitally.

Extra Tidbit: Thoughts on THE THING (2011)?
Source: ADI

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Spitting Bullets
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

11:14AM on 01/04/2013
The prequel is okay...it was faithful to the look of the original, the opening scene is great, it does a nice job of outlining what precisely happened to the Norwegians (little details like the axe in the hallway MacReady walks past) and Mary Elizabeth Winstead looked right at home rocking a parka and flamethrower. But other than that it doesn't even come close.

Definitely better than the godawful horror remakes plaguing theaters the last ten years, but the CGI just kills it. Nightmare
The prequel is okay...it was faithful to the look of the original, the opening scene is great, it does a nice job of outlining what precisely happened to the Norwegians (little details like the axe in the hallway MacReady walks past) and Mary Elizabeth Winstead looked right at home rocking a parka and flamethrower. But other than that it doesn't even come close.

Definitely better than the godawful horror remakes plaguing theaters the last ten years, but the CGI just kills it. Nightmare on Elm Street III territory at best.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
7:11AM on 01/04/2013
The Thing (2011) is quite good actually. It goes toes-to-toes with the original The Thing very well. However, and this is just me, I prefer practical special effects over CGI effects.
The Thing (2011) is quite good actually. It goes toes-to-toes with the original The Thing very well. However, and this is just me, I prefer practical special effects over CGI effects.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Movie News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Mistress Of The Week

More
Terell, Taryn