Latest Horror Movie Headlines

It's the Booze Talkin': Why can't the Academy Awards give horror respect?

Feb. 11, 2014by: JimmyO

Its that time of year again. March 2nd is heading our way and the Academy is about to celebrate the best and brightest Hollywood has to offer. Certainly 2013 was a great year with such Oscar nominated fare as HER, DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, 12 YEARS A SLAVE, THE WOLF OF WALL STREET and so many other high-caliber, thought provoking films. It is always a pleasant surprise when putting together a top 10 list and facing the realization that there is a plethora of greatness to choose from. Not surprisingly however is the lack of genre specific feature films vying for recognition. Aside from Alfonso Cuarns extraordinary space drama GRAVITY the Academy Awards seem to forget that horror, science fiction and fantasy are all an important part of modern cinema.

Rarely will horror or science fiction find itself on display with the best of the best. Of course there will always be exceptions to the rule, but so very few that you could probably count the films to receive serious recognition on your fingers. Ruth Gordon won Best Supporting Actress in 1969 for her work in the unforgettable ROSEMARYS BABY. The 1973 classic THE EXORCIST received numerous nominations, among them Best Actress for Ellen Burstyn, Best Supporting Actress for Linda Blair, Best Director for William Friedkin, Best Picture and more. William Peter Blatty ultimately won that year for Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium (Best Adapted Screenplay).

Other big genre winners over the past few decades include THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS in 1991. This massive success not only took home Best Picture but it also earned Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins Best Actress and Best Actor statuettes. The great Kathy Bates scared up a Best Actress win with her portrayal of Annie Wilkes in the film adaptation of Stephen Kings novel MISERY the year before in 1990. And if we are talking about fantasy as well we could include the majestic THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING which swept the awards ceremony back in 2004.

Certainly every single one of these films could be considered genre on some level. Yet each one had an impressive budget with a name director or a studio willing to spend some advertising dollars to reach out to Academy members. But what about this years THE CONJURING? It was a surprise hit for writer/director James Wan and quite frankly, both Vera Farmiga and Lily Taylor give outstanding, award worthy performances. Is it simply because this was too crowded a year? That very likely is part of it, but would this well-reviewed tale of a haunting find enough voters to check the ballot for a ghost story with a little possession thrown in. It seems that even if the playing field wasnt quite so packed it may just be that a film like this would not be considered Academy Award worthy.

Back in 2012, there was one performance so intense that it still haunts me. While Ciaran Foys CITADEL is a flawed film, Aneurin Barnard is absolutely stunning as an agoraphobic father desperately trying to save his daughter from a demented gang of feral children. Of course a film like this might never be nominated for anything outside a film festival or two, yet Barnard gives an incredible performance in a small horror film without a major studio behind it. Isnt that really one of the major problems with the Academy Awards in general? Most of the time the winners depend on the money spent, the politics behind it or whether or not they have won before. And if you are talking a not so mainstream horror film or thriller, it doesnt appear that you have a chance in hell for any sort of recognition.

Maybe its the booze talkin', but the Academy needs to give horror a little more respect. To create real terror or tension is a powerful thing. If you are making an audience believe that there is a demonic force threatening a family, youve done an incredible job. Or if you create a sense of paranoia and dread as a father with a debilitating fear of the world outside, it is a performance worth paying attention to. What will happen if GRAVITY is the big winner this year? Will it open the door for more science fiction in the eyes of the Academy? Id like to think so, but once again you have a larger-than-life feature with star-power behind it. Maybe one day well not only see big budget genre films battling for Oscar Gold, but somehow maybe a movie like THE CONJURING, CITADEL or even this past years STOKER will find the respect they deserve.

Extra Tidbit: What performance from a horror film do you think deserved a little more recognition?

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Spitting Bullets
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

+2
4:33PM on 02/11/2014

Horror needs to start treating it's audiences with more respect, by being more intelligent, clever, and by actually being scary. There are not many "great" or even "good" horror films today

I love that you had the title "Why can't the Academy give horror respect?" and the photo with the headline was from the Best Picture winner "The Silence Of The Lambs".
Let's face facts the Academy has recognized and even honored some of the best horror, scariest, and thrilling films of all time: Jaws, The Exorcist, Alien, Aliens, Carrie, The Sixth Sense, The Silence of The Lambs, PSYCHO! Two of the biggest missing from this list are The Shinning and Halloween. Genuine intense, gut-wrenching,
I love that you had the title "Why can't the Academy give horror respect?" and the photo with the headline was from the Best Picture winner "The Silence Of The Lambs".
Let's face facts the Academy has recognized and even honored some of the best horror, scariest, and thrilling films of all time: Jaws, The Exorcist, Alien, Aliens, Carrie, The Sixth Sense, The Silence of The Lambs, PSYCHO! Two of the biggest missing from this list are The Shinning and Halloween. Genuine intense, gut-wrenching, and very terrifying films that made an impact on audiences everywhere and of all ages.
"The Conjuring"? Oscar worthy? Please! Hollywood horror needs to once again re-think their image and material. Blood, guts, and torture do not make a horror film, good or even scary. While a film like "The Conjuring" may turn out to be a good film with good performances it's still the same horror films as every other James Wan. Sci-fi already re-crafted their material by adding more than just space, battles, and explosions. Films like, "District 9", "Gravity" and "Prometheus".
Majority of all Hollywood and non-Hollywood directors can make a decent or bloody horror film, it's when they make something far greater that gets the recognition.
P.S. Last "great" scary film was "The Descent", but even a horror film like that would've only pulled off a Make-up or Sound nomination at best.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
12:21PM on 02/11/2014

To annswer the tidbit

I always thought Dee Wallace in Cujo was really good
I always thought Dee Wallace in Cujo was really good
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:19PM on 02/11/2014
I agree with this completely. That was a fantastic performance.
I agree with this completely. That was a fantastic performance.
11:27AM on 02/11/2014

Everyone's to Blaim

I love horror, but Rosemary's Baby and Silence of the Lambs (two of my favorite movies) hit notes that 99% of horror movies miss (Shutter Island hit these notes as well. Very underrated and looked over in my opinion), including The Conjuring. The Conjuring is a great horror movie, but it takes a horror fan to distinguish it from all the other bullshit floating around, and then give it the respect it deserves.

With all the garbage, remakes, parodies, rip offs, found footage trash floating
I love horror, but Rosemary's Baby and Silence of the Lambs (two of my favorite movies) hit notes that 99% of horror movies miss (Shutter Island hit these notes as well. Very underrated and looked over in my opinion), including The Conjuring. The Conjuring is a great horror movie, but it takes a horror fan to distinguish it from all the other bullshit floating around, and then give it the respect it deserves.

With all the garbage, remakes, parodies, rip offs, found footage trash floating around, horror has become a mockery. The studios know it's a way for them to make a quick buck, and they can care less about the quality they are putting on screen. It shows now more than ever.

...plus, James Wan is a good director, but he's no fuckin' Martin Scorsese.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:16AM on 02/11/2014

Ehh, horror is overlooked for good reason.

When a horror movie is good, and recognized it deserves it. But come on, as much as I loved The Conjuring and thought it had an amazing screenplay and director, it wasn't up to par with Captain Phillips, Dallas Buyers Club, Wolf of Wallstreet. I would feel like the genre would be selling out if they made movies for award consideration rather than for the fans.

There is too much political BS behind the awards too, I can't see James Wan going to dinners with James Cameron, Steven Spielberg or
When a horror movie is good, and recognized it deserves it. But come on, as much as I loved The Conjuring and thought it had an amazing screenplay and director, it wasn't up to par with Captain Phillips, Dallas Buyers Club, Wolf of Wallstreet. I would feel like the genre would be selling out if they made movies for award consideration rather than for the fans.

There is too much political BS behind the awards too, I can't see James Wan going to dinners with James Cameron, Steven Spielberg or Ben Affleck trying to tell voters why his movie deserves to win best sound editing.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Movie News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Mistress Of The Week

More
Argyris, Michelle