Latest Horror Movie Headlines

The F*cking Black Sheep: Robocop 3 (1993)

Sep. 26, 2013by: Ryan Doom

THE BLACK SHEEP is an ongoing column featuring different takes on films that either the writer HATED, but that the majority of film fans LOVED, or that the writer LOVED, but that most others LOATH. We're hoping this column will promote constructive and geek fueled discussion. Dig in!

Robocop 3 (1993)
Directed by Fred Dekker

“.Robocop 3 is stupidly fun and mindlessly entertaining.”

 

First, there was the great Robocop, the classic sci-fi flick (previously discussed here last week). Then came along the eventual Robocop 2, which was perfectly good. Then…then there’s Robocop 3. You know, the one that gets the blame for shooting the franchise in the head with that big robogun. You know, the one with the ninja robot. The one without Peter Weller. The one that really tanked at the box office. The one rated PG-13. The one where Robocop can fly!

Yeah, that one. The surprising thing is that even though it’s the bastard of the franchise (or is it the TV show?), it’s no punk. And like a punk it’s reputation has been greatly exaggerated. Now I haven’t attempted to watch Robocop 3 in…hell, I don’t know, but I always remember it being the bad one. IMDB rates it a pathetic 3.7, which is downright a pathetic fall from grace. However, once I decided to give it another go I discovered something unexpected: Robocop 3 is stupidly fun and mindlessly entertaining. No, really.

To start, Robert Burke isn’t Peter Weller. Obviously, right? But the dude fills in the role well, even though he does little to make it his own. Sure, sure, Weller’s face is mostly covered, but the producers obviously thought audiences were dumb because they just tried to slide him in there as if we wouldn’t notice. When most franchises hire a new guy, they at least attempt a reboot or give the actor some breathing room. Burke does add a thicker layer of sappiness and tenderness to the role. While in Robocop 1 we got through limited emotional events (he is new at the roboman thing), Burke plays the character as if fresh from counseling. A little too loving. A little too loyal to those outside his orders. Oh, and speaking of actors, Robocop 3 does pack in the later-to-be big TV stars. Stephen Root, CCH Pounder, Rip Torn, Daniel von Bargen, Jeff Garlin, Shane Black (!), Bradley Whitford, and even freakin’ Mako show up in here.

Now, there’s some of obvious horrendous stuff here. First, the fact the producers released a PG-13 Robocop bitch slaps the original's legacy. If they couldn’t find a way to include violence as a theme, then it just isn’t doing Paul Verhoeven's film justice. Worst than that comes the (SPOILER!) death of Nancy Allen’s Office Lewis, who dies like an absolute punk (the bad kind). Her death really perhaps is the dumbest on screen “heroic” death I’ve ever seen. It comes when Robocop and her stand in front of a church filled with innocents, blocking the evil OCP army from cleaning them all out. Standing IN FRONT of the metal man WITHOUT a vest, she’s ready for a shootout, armed with a pistol against an army. And she's the one talking shit as if bullet proof too. She deserved to get dead. (END).

Actually, another fault comes from lacking a true villain. Yeah, we have McDaggett (John Castle), but compared to a Clarence Boddicker or a Dick Jones, he’s too light, too unrealistic. Then again, it would have been impossible to duplicate Boddicker. Fans remember him because he was so damn good. Instead, McDaggett just goes in a different direction; he works fine as yet another OCP member who has gone mad with power.I just wish they had given him at least a moment to truly define his character (think Dick Jones in the bathroom). Even better is the kung fu robot. My memory always told me it was what ruined part 3, but the character works. It just seems a little out of place. 

t’s always interesting to note Robocop 3 marks Sin City/Dark Knight Returns/300 creator Frank Miller’s first entry into screenwriting. Knowing that and having read a lot of his work, the movie actually stinks of his style. The dude loves drugged out punks who speak in riddles. He loves over the top weaponry and all things kung fu. With Robocop 3, Miller adds a true comic book touch to the movie. He glues on an extra layer of silliness that works years later...as long as we know what the movie is: less budget, less blood, less effects.But still Robocop. 

GET ROBOCOP 3 DVD HERE

GET ROBOCOP 3 BLU RAY HERE

MORE FUN FROM AROUND THE WEB

Spitting Bullets
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

+5
4:28PM on 09/26/2013

No

We have not. I love the first and like parts of the second but the third was nothing but trash. From the ridiculous jetpack to the multiple Samurai bots to the fact that its not even Peter Fucking Weller in the roll. That movie was B-R-utal.
We have not. I love the first and like parts of the second but the third was nothing but trash. From the ridiculous jetpack to the multiple Samurai bots to the fact that its not even Peter Fucking Weller in the roll. That movie was B-R-utal.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
2:29PM on 09/26/2013
This article has been sent back to us from the future, shortly after the 'RoboCop' remake has plopped its way into cinemas and made everyone re-evaluate this sequel, hasn't it?
This article has been sent back to us from the future, shortly after the 'RoboCop' remake has plopped its way into cinemas and made everyone re-evaluate this sequel, hasn't it?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
1:13PM on 09/26/2013
"Its always interesting to note Robocop 3 marks Sin City/Dark Knight Returns/300 creator Frank Millers first entry into screenwriting." Nah man, that was Robocop 2. Actually, both Robo 2 and 3 are from the same original script - originally the OCP thugs...forget what they were called, the relocation people...anyway, originally Kane was one of them, a ridiculously violent one who ends up being RoboCop 2. Nuke and all that was happening at the same time. They did a comic book a while back
"Its always interesting to note Robocop 3 marks Sin City/Dark Knight Returns/300 creator Frank Millers first entry into screenwriting." Nah man, that was Robocop 2. Actually, both Robo 2 and 3 are from the same original script - originally the OCP thugs...forget what they were called, the relocation people...anyway, originally Kane was one of them, a ridiculously violent one who ends up being RoboCop 2. Nuke and all that was happening at the same time. They did a comic book a while back adapting his original screenplay with some hideous art.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
+5
12:22PM on 09/26/2013
Cmon man, really?
Cmon man, really?
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
10:27AM on 09/26/2013
Honestly, as a kid, when I first saw RoboCop flying, I was practically jumping in my seat. However, as a grown up, the whole movie is a bit silly. Think about this: Batman has Batman and Batman Returns then came along Batman Forever which was a total opposite of previous two movies. Same goes with RoboCop 3. It's still entertaining alright, just not as good as previous two movies.
Honestly, as a kid, when I first saw RoboCop flying, I was practically jumping in my seat. However, as a grown up, the whole movie is a bit silly. Think about this: Batman has Batman and Batman Returns then came along Batman Forever which was a total opposite of previous two movies. Same goes with RoboCop 3. It's still entertaining alright, just not as good as previous two movies.
Your Reply:



Please email me when someone replies to my comment
View All Comments

Latest Movie News Headlines


Top
Loading...

Mistress Of The Week

More
Terell, Taryn