ARROW IN THE HEAD REVIEWS

002115
Search by title # A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Underworld 3 (2009)
Written by: The Arrow
Director: Patrick Tatopoulos

Starring:
Michael Sheen/Lucian
Bill Nighy/Viktor
Rhona Mitra/Sonja
Steven Mackintosh/Tannis
5 10
PLOT-CRUNCH
We go back in time to see how the Lycans (werewolves for the uninitiated) freed themselves from the shackles of their Vampire masters; hence launching the pussy vs. pooch war that transpired in Underworld 1 and 2.
THE LOWDOWN
I didn’t have much faith in UNDERWORLD 3 from the get-go. Personally, I wanted another sequel not a damn prequel. No Kate Beckingsale no Len Wiseman or Scott Speedman – this one had STD written all over it (Wasn’t it meant to be a DVD sequel at first?). And once the trailers got released, my hopes of it being badass hit rock bottom. Underwhelming was the word. I expected nada from it. Was I on the ball?

UNDERWORLD 3 kicked it good in some instances. FX maestro and first time director Patrick Tatopoulos (who did the creature effects on the last two films) kept to the overtly bluish look, slow motion abusing and flashy vibe that UNDERWORLD is known for. Baby looked spank-spank good! Story wise, I dug the random connections to the first two films and let’s face it; this was WAYYYY more of a Romeo and Juliet-ish opus than the first film (which mis-promoted itself as a horror version of the Bards famous tale). Rhona Mitra and Michael Sheen’s forbidden love thing worked well, their chemistry was on and their courtship acted as the core of the flick. So they had me there!

My biggest kick though was watching Bill Nighy teach that scenery a dire lesson in manners. At the end of the evisceration this was his show and he rocked it via his Shakespearian like demeanor, imposing presence and shades of grey performance. What about the special effects you may ask? Well the werewolves design were groovy-o as usual, the gore ample enough while the man to wolf transformations were “acceptable” in all of their quickie CG glory. Finally, clocking at an hour and half, this bitch went down real easy – as she should. First thing I said to me (yes I talk to myself all the time) when leaving the theatre was: “Did I just see a movie? I wouldn’t know!” So at least the whole was a harmless lay to pin down.

Thing was, UNDERWORLD 3 had obviously less coin in its nap-sack than its predecessors. There was too much shoddy green screen, it felt too contained, and I got sick real fast of being trapped in the Vamps' Gothic Castle. BRING ME SOMEWHERE ELSE ALREADY! The lack of gun play, big stunt set pieces and elaborate action bits also let me down. Don’t get me wrong we had action here but nothing truly whooped me hardcore. If you bring up Underworld 1 or 2 to me – stand-out pow-wow scenes will pop up. This one? I already disregarded most of it. The now and again close/quick cut tendencies as to the physical get-downs didn’t help in the latter point. How can I be jazzed if my brain doesn’t have the time to register what’s happening?

Speaking of editing woes; a couple of sequences were jumbled cutting wise. I wasn’t too sure where people were and what was happening. And what was up with Rhona Mitra’s eyes always changing colors? Sometimes she wore blue contacts, other times she had her natural brown eyes. Did I miss something here to explain that one? Distracting! In addition, I can’t say the narrative blew me away. The human angle was underdeveloped (how did they fit in all of this), we’ve seen the Braveheart spiel a million times and the Romeo and Juliet thing; 2 million times. And no cliché was left un-turn at that. Result – it was all VERY déjà vu and mucho predictable. Flipping conventions on their heads and going against the grain here would’ve added some oomph to the whole.

All in all, I saw UNDERWORLD 3, had a tolerable time with it and then it leaked out of my noggin forever, never to be recollected again. I anticipate more than the basics out of an Underworld flick… but hey… that’s just me and my pet sock talking. So you gonna neuter this one or what?
GORE
We get mucho clawed and slit throats, impalings, stabbings and ripped off limbs. Don’t blink though cause the gore splashes on quick.
ACTING
Michael Sheen (Lucian) was intense and grounded all the way. Dude made me buy it! Good shit! Bill Nighy (Viktor) had magnetism to burn!! He WAS the movie. Rhona Mitra (Sonja) did fine with what she was given and could’ve been a worthy successor to Beckingsale with more screen time and more to do in general. Steven Mackintosh (Tannis) had the quiet opportunist thing down pat and Kevin Grevioux (Raze) stood out in his small yet engrossing role.
T & A
Mitra and Sheen go nude but we don’t see Jack or Shite – yup, one of those! At least we got to see lots of hairy, werewolf ass! Yeah that last quip was a joke.
DIRECTING
It’s moody, it’s sleek, it rains in slow motion, it has creative shots and white flashes left and right – it’s Underworld. Patrick Tatopoulos obviously did his homework in terms of the vibe of the franchise and he delivered!
SOUNDTRACK
Paul Haslinger’s somber and aggressive score did the trick!
BOTTOM LINE
UNDERWORLD 3 wound being an average effort that maybe would’ve been more at home as an STD release. The visuals were polished; it rolled on at a healthy pace and came through with the red stuff, a mini love story and lots of werewolves going buck nuts. Alas the storyline was slim, pedestrian and too derivative of other films but worse of all –overtly predictable. The action scenes were less spectacular than the usual Underworld goods and I got to say it, one of Underworld’s main appeals for me; is a feud between werewolves and vampires within OUR TIME. I give a f*ck what they did in the Middle Ages. I’m done! Off to the Pub!
BULL'S EYE
The film was shot in New Zealand and North Carolina, USA.

Kate Beckinsale is in the film via footage from Underworld Part 1. When Michael Sheen acted in Underworld, Kate Beckingsale was his girlfriend (they have a daughter together). Len Wiseman and Beckingsale started a relationship during the shoot and they are now together. Poor Michael Sheen... must have a been an interesting set to be on...yeesh!

VISIT THE UNDERWORLD 3 SITE HERE

Strikeback
Not registered? Sign-up!
Or

+0
6:47AM on 05/24/2009

Weakest of the series, but still enjoyable.

This prequel lacks Kate Beckinsale, who's far more beautiful and a much better actress than Rhona Mitra, and it lacks Len Wiseman, who's got a much better visual flair for choreographing and filming action sequences than Patrick Tatopoulos.

That said, the movie still entertains. The action scenes deliver enough of the expected thrills, and the story is compelling enough. Bill Nighy turns in a highly enjoyable over the top performance, and Michael Sheen puts in a good effort, even if the
This prequel lacks Kate Beckinsale, who's far more beautiful and a much better actress than Rhona Mitra, and it lacks Len Wiseman, who's got a much better visual flair for choreographing and filming action sequences than Patrick Tatopoulos.

That said, the movie still entertains. The action scenes deliver enough of the expected thrills, and the story is compelling enough. Bill Nighy turns in a highly enjoyable over the top performance, and Michael Sheen puts in a good effort, even if the script doesn't always do him favors.

It needed a bigger budget, though. Despite good production values and okay CGI, we needed to see far more of this medieval world than the one castle and the surrounding forests.

Still, it's an overall decent mix of action and medieval fantasy/horror.
Your Reply:



6:53AM on 02/25/2009
There are 2 things that prevent this from being a great movie. 1) It's way too murky and darkly lit and 2) the action scenes were not choreographed and directed well. If only Len Wisemen had returned in the director's chair. Oh, well. It's a shame because this is surprisingly very good. Not quite on the level of the first Underworld but a little bit better than the second one. Good story, strong acting and excellent special effects/CGI/makeup. At least when we can see them since the
There are 2 things that prevent this from being a great movie. 1) It's way too murky and darkly lit and 2) the action scenes were not choreographed and directed well. If only Len Wisemen had returned in the director's chair. Oh, well. It's a shame because this is surprisingly very good. Not quite on the level of the first Underworld but a little bit better than the second one. Good story, strong acting and excellent special effects/CGI/makeup. At least when we can see them since the camera moves around too much for us to be able to see a lot of the action. Still a very good movie though.
Your Reply:



3:30PM on 01/27/2009

UW 3 a 2/4, but Twilight 2.5/4? Really?

Underworld 3 definitely wasn't GREAT, but for not having Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, or Len Wiseman at the helm, this movie held its own as a prequel. Maybe it's just me but I even preferred it; the character of Lucian was just far too badass to not involve him in another Underworld film. Some of the editing did make it tough to view what was going on, but overall I'd consider it better than the second and on par with the first.

Oh, and is it just me or did Bill Nighy seem to be annoyed
Underworld 3 definitely wasn't GREAT, but for not having Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, or Len Wiseman at the helm, this movie held its own as a prequel. Maybe it's just me but I even preferred it; the character of Lucian was just far too badass to not involve him in another Underworld film. Some of the editing did make it tough to view what was going on, but overall I'd consider it better than the second and on par with the first.

Oh, and is it just me or did Bill Nighy seem to be annoyed with his contacts? Some parts he seemed to be blinking too much, others his eyes were just wide freaking open.
Your Reply:



5:01PM on 01/26/2009
I thought it ranked on the same level as a uwe boll flick. Definately not what I was hoping for from the underworld series.
I thought it ranked on the same level as a uwe boll flick. Definately not what I was hoping for from the underworld series.
Your Reply:



+0
3:15PM on 01/26/2009

STD? really

Maybe there needs to be a new acronym for Straight to DVD. I read the tagline and was looking forward to a foul mouthed tirade about a crappy movie. Although, in this case it may just fit.
Maybe there needs to be a new acronym for Straight to DVD. I read the tagline and was looking forward to a foul mouthed tirade about a crappy movie. Although, in this case it may just fit.
Your Reply:



2:16PM on 01/26/2009

Her name is Rhona, not Rhonda

I freaking LOVE all things "Underworld," so this was just another awesome time for me. Sure, cliches abounded and the sex scene was rather bizarre, but I knew what I was in for three years ago, five years ago, when the other two films came out.

This film was as much cerebral as it was action-oriented. It filled in many plot holes and questions raised by the fans (for example, a classic one being, "did Lucian know Sonja was pregnant?" A resounding YES went through my brain when it was
I freaking LOVE all things "Underworld," so this was just another awesome time for me. Sure, cliches abounded and the sex scene was rather bizarre, but I knew what I was in for three years ago, five years ago, when the other two films came out.

This film was as much cerebral as it was action-oriented. It filled in many plot holes and questions raised by the fans (for example, a classic one being, "did Lucian know Sonja was pregnant?" A resounding YES went through my brain when it was confirmed). I liked the origin of Lucian, the lycan son of a feral mother. Sonja was rather 2-dimensional as a character, but it was her differences and not her similarities with Selene which struck a chord with me.

As a massive unashamed "Underworld" fangirl, I left the theater thrilled and pumped and satisfied.
Your Reply:



+0
1:57PM on 01/26/2009

picky, picky, picky...

we should look at changing "straight to dvd to straight to video", as i confused the titlr with an STD release, thinking it had a sexually transmitted disease, yuck!!

reviewers should also know, especially fanboy stuff, that Rhona mitra is not Rhonda...hello, spellcheck? (needds turned off here).

Review itself pretty spot on, though...underworld is under-whelming, not enough Rhona, too much dark castle vibe and middle ages set design,not enough blood n guts, though a few shots rocked
we should look at changing "straight to dvd to straight to video", as i confused the titlr with an STD release, thinking it had a sexually transmitted disease, yuck!!

reviewers should also know, especially fanboy stuff, that Rhona mitra is not Rhonda...hello, spellcheck? (needds turned off here).

Review itself pretty spot on, though...underworld is under-whelming, not enough Rhona, too much dark castle vibe and middle ages set design,not enough blood n guts, though a few shots rocked (sharpened pole through the head, anyone?) music was cool, scary in a typical way.

i'd like to see a "futuristic" take, an ultra-modern lycan v vampire opus, with nudity, more gore, and no PG13 vibe, give us adults a little more meat.
Your Reply:



+0
10:48AM on 01/26/2009
Well arrow I think you missed it here. I am surprised I really thought you would dig this one. Oh Well.

I enjoyed this more then the second one for sure and liked it about as much as the first. But I like Lucian and Viktor so this film hit it for me.

By the way the changing eye color thing. Kate Beckingsale's eyes did the same thing in the first two films. It seems to happen when their emotions are high. Anger, Fear, Feeding, Sex, Fighting Etc... All of these things turned Kate's eyes
Well arrow I think you missed it here. I am surprised I really thought you would dig this one. Oh Well.

I enjoyed this more then the second one for sure and liked it about as much as the first. But I like Lucian and Viktor so this film hit it for me.

By the way the changing eye color thing. Kate Beckingsale's eyes did the same thing in the first two films. It seems to happen when their emotions are high. Anger, Fear, Feeding, Sex, Fighting Etc... All of these things turned Kate's eyes from brown to Blue.
Your Reply:



Featured Youtube Videos

Views and Counting

Mistress Of The Week

More
Winnick, Katheryn